Top Law Schools

The interview is for a 2L summer spot with a company that regularly hires summers.

My main question is what a good answer to the "why in-house" question looks like, but tips about anything else are more than welcome.

My straightforward answer is more responsibility earlier on (supposedly) and better hours (supposedly). Obviously I don't want to state the latter reason...

Thank you!

I'm a 2012 grad who started in-house at a software company. I graduated around median at a T-14, on moot-court but no journal, etc.

For my job it was incredibly important to explain why I wanted to work in the software/technology sector. I don't think I would have gotten the job without a compelling story about wanting to work on emerging issues in the field. I also had work experience as a technology consultant to back me up.

Even if you don't have relevant work experience, you need to connect to the company's business as well as the law. At a firm the business is the law. That is not the case in-house.

Finally, try to find an alum ally inside to support you if you can. Having an insider advocating for you helps for any job.

Anonymous User wrote:I'm a 2012 grad who started in-house at a software company. I graduated around median at a T-14, on moot-court but no journal, etc.

For my job it was incredibly important to explain why I wanted to work in the software/technology sector. I don't think I would have gotten the job without a compelling story about wanting to work on emerging issues in the field. I also had work experience as a technology consultant to back me up.

Even if you don't have relevant work experience, you need to connect to the company's business as well as the law. At a firm the business is the law. That is not the case in-house.

Finally, try to find an alum ally inside to support you if you can. Having an insider advocating for you helps for any job.

Not OP, but I'm in a similar position.


In your experience do most in-house gigs hire from their SA class. Also, I know it is common to go private firm to in-house. Is the reverse true?

Thanks!

Anonymous User wrote:I'm a 2012 grad who started in-house at a software company. I graduated around median at a T-14, on moot-court but no journal, etc.

For my job it was incredibly important to explain why I wanted to work in the software/technology sector. I don't think I would have gotten the job without a compelling story about wanting to work on emerging issues in the field. I also had work experience as a technology consultant to back me up.

Even if you don't have relevant work experience, you need to connect to the company's business as well as the law. At a firm the business is the law. That is not the case in-house.

Finally, try to find an alum ally inside to support you if you can. Having an insider advocating for you helps for any job.

Technology sector in-house is pretty much my dream job. If you wouldn't mind PMing me, I'd really appreciate it. I have a lot of questions regarding how/whether I can get something along these lines.

sorry to derail, but my career services told me that in house positions weren't interviewing yet, and that they started in a few months. where and how are you guys finding these positions?

Anonymous User wrote:sorry to derail, but my career services told me that in house positions weren't interviewing yet, and that they started in a few months. where and how are you guys finding these positions?

Don't listen to CSO. Check lawstudentjobs.net and company websites. Ask CSO if they have list of alumni who are in house

Anonymous User wrote: Not OP, but I'm in a similar position.

In your experience do most in-house gigs hire from their SA class. Also, I know it is common to go private firm to in-house. Is the reverse true?

Thanks!

In the year I've been in-house we've hired a couple attorneys. A few were from law firms, most were from other companies. One was our outside bankruptcy counsel beforehand. As far as I know no one has left the company to go to a firm.

FWIW the Association of Corporate Counsel, which is basically the in-house bar, has a publicly accessible jobs site. Most of the positions are not entry level, but might be worth a look.

Anonymous User wrote:I'm a 2012 grad who started in-house at a software company. I graduated around median at a T-14, on moot-court but no journal, etc.

For my job it was incredibly important to explain why I wanted to work in the software/technology sector. I don't think I would have gotten the job without a compelling story about wanting to work on emerging issues in the field. I also had work experience as a technology consultant to back me up.

Even if you don't have relevant work experience, you need to connect to the company's business as well as the law. At a firm the business is the law. That is not the case in-house.

Finally, try to find an alum ally inside to support you if you can. Having an insider advocating for you helps for any job.

OP here. Thank you for the advice, this definitely helps.