Page 1 of 1

N/a

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:29 pm
by suoicerp
no longer relevant

Re: Completely ambivalent

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:30 pm
by brotherdarkness
.

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:27 pm
by Anonymous User
are you seriously considering under market paying firms? (pryor) if so, why?

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:43 pm
by Anonymous User
What are your interests?

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:53 pm
by Anonymous User
bump. this is relevant to my interests

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:51 pm
by suoicerp
n/a

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:30 am
by Anonymous User
I'm a little surprised about why Orrick isn't getting more love. anyone wanna share thoughts?

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:41 am
by VeritasVlad
Orrick is great culturally. More chill than most of biglaw for sure.

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:23 pm
by Anonymous User
There is something grimy about kasowitz.

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:51 pm
by Anonymous User
I summered at Kasowitz. Had a great time, got an offer, etc. I'm not grimy. Place doesn't feel grimy.

Just a good firm that gets high quality work.

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:39 pm
by suoicerp
n/a

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:45 pm
by Anonymous User
suoicerp wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I summered at Kasowitz. Had a great time, got an offer, etc. I'm not grimy. Place doesn't feel grimy.

Just a good firm that gets high quality work.
Well they are now out of the picture because they called me and told me to accept elsewhere.
What?

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:57 pm
by Anonymous User
Winston should not be picked by anyone who has an alternative option that pays market.

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 8:02 pm
by suoicerp
n/a

Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 8:32 pm
by NYstate
suoicerp wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I summered at Kasowitz. Had a great time, got an offer, etc. I'm not grimy. Place doesn't feel grimy.

Just a good firm that gets high quality work.
Well they are now out of the picture because they called me and told me to accept elsewhere.
It's a good sign they warned you. I would strongly suggest people who have offers there to go elsewhere. They may end up having to no offer people if they aren't going to have room for everyone. So smart move on your part.

Of these firms, stay away from Winston; I don't know much other than Wilkie seems like a decent place to work.