Page 1 of 1

Plaintiffs firms SF

Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:29 am
by Anonymous User
What are good plaintiffs firms that a 3.1 GULC with good SF ties can email?

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:08 am
by anon168
Anonymous User wrote:What are good plaintiffs firms that a 3.1 GULC with good SF ties can email?
Lieff, Robbins Geller, Cochett -- for plaintiffs' side securities work

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:33 am
by Anonymous User
anon168 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:What are good plaintiffs firms that a 3.1 GULC with good SF ties can email?
Lieff, Robbins Geller, Cochett -- for plaintiffs' side securities work
These are the firms that come to mind immediately for me, too, when I think "SF Plaintiffs" but I know Lieff is highly grades selective and I'm pretty sure the other two are as well. It's worth giving these guys a shot but I'd also try to extend your search to smaller firms. Unfortunately I don't know the names of those firms, but maybe good places to look would be SF legal publications. This document has a decent list, but I have this weird recollection that some of those firms aren't really plaintiffs firms. Worth looking at though:

--LinkRemoved--

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:04 pm
by anon168
Anonymous User wrote:
anon168 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:What are good plaintiffs firms that a 3.1 GULC with good SF ties can email?
Lieff, Robbins Geller, Cochett -- for plaintiffs' side securities work
These are the firms that come to mind immediately for me, too, when I think "SF Plaintiffs" but I know Lieff is highly grades selective and I'm pretty sure the other two are as well. It's worth giving these guys a shot but I'd also try to extend your search to smaller firms. Unfortunately I don't know the names of those firms, but maybe good places to look would be SF legal publications. This document has a decent list, but I have this weird recollection that some of those firms aren't really plaintiffs firms. Worth looking at though:

--LinkRemoved--
That's not exactly accurate.

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:39 pm
by Anonymous User
curious about this as well. i'm NYC biglaw looking to lateral to SF plaintiffs side.

anon168 can you elaborate?

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:09 pm
by anon168
Anonymous User wrote:curious about this as well. i'm NYC biglaw looking to lateral to SF plaintiffs side.

anon168 can you elaborate?

Cotchett is not grade conscious. Nor is Robbins Geller. Leiff maybe in comparison to Cotchett and Robbins Geller, but in practice it's not that hard to get a job there -- assuming they are hiring, which is the biggest barrier with them.

The only real grade conscious firm on the "left" side of the V in SF is probably Altshuler Berzon.

Feel free to PM if you want more info.

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:21 pm
by Anonymous User
anon168 wrote: Cotchett is not grade conscious. Nor is Robbins Geller. Leiff maybe in comparison to Cotchett and Robbins Geller, but in practice it's not that hard to get a job there -- assuming they are hiring, which is the biggest barrier with them.
Anon who said they were grade conscious.

You're right re Cotchett and RG, thanks for correcting me. I think you underestimate the difficulty of getting a job at Lieff - not everybody has your (substantial) experience, 168.

Re: Plaintiffs firms SF

Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:41 pm
by Nammertat
Dechert also does a lot of plaintiff work in CA... and a fair amount of troll.