Quality of Life/Pay at Small Litigation Firm?
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 8:12 pm
I feel like opinions are across the board on this one. Obviously some small firms pay shit and work their associates to the bone. Others seem middle of the road. Other's seem to pay better than Big Law.
Is there any good, general indicator? I recently interviewed at a small firm in a 1M-2M population city in a large state that otherwise has a top market pay range (take your pick, Ca, Tx, NY etc - I'm being vague on purpose) that focuses mainly on insurance defense and commercial litigation. Associates didn't seem to be making bank but also didn't seem like they needed to work second jobs and had decent hours. The partners, on the other hand, seemed pretty "well-heeled."
Is there any good, general indicator? I recently interviewed at a small firm in a 1M-2M population city in a large state that otherwise has a top market pay range (take your pick, Ca, Tx, NY etc - I'm being vague on purpose) that focuses mainly on insurance defense and commercial litigation. Associates didn't seem to be making bank but also didn't seem like they needed to work second jobs and had decent hours. The partners, on the other hand, seemed pretty "well-heeled."