Help with 1L summer options (RA v. In-house)
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 9:11 pm
Maybe the anon is a bit too much for this but better safe than sorry.
Anyway, I have two 1L summer offers between which I'd like help deciding. First, there's a research assistant position for a somewhat prestigious criminal law journal. Criminal law interests me the most and while I'm not set on it, the subject is a plus. That said, it's RA work and pretty boring stuff. The real advantage is that I can do this at my leisure from anywhere, so I could go home avoiding rent for the summer. I also would be able to attend a summer session my school runs in Europe which would be fun and take care of some credits.
The second is an in-house gig at a Fortune 500 company near my school. It offers the opportunity to work in all sorts of different stuff (regulatory, litigation, corporate, etc.) as interests and needs dictate, which is really cool. That said, it'll require staying in my school's city and working 9-5 all summer. The company's industry does interest me and touch on some cool issues, but it's a long way from criminal stuff which, see above, I find the most interesting.
Both positions pay pretty similar, but the in-house is better. If I'm home doing the RA thing I can make more money writing for other people and if I do the summer session thing I'll come out about even for the summer. I don't know if I'll have the energy for that if I do the in-house.
Am I crazy to even thinking about turning down the in-house thing? Part of me says I am. Are employers going to laugh at an RA job come OCI/Honors/whatever interviews? Are people going to find plan A evidence of laziness? Anyone do anything like either of these and willing to comment on what they're like? Thanks in advance.
Anyway, I have two 1L summer offers between which I'd like help deciding. First, there's a research assistant position for a somewhat prestigious criminal law journal. Criminal law interests me the most and while I'm not set on it, the subject is a plus. That said, it's RA work and pretty boring stuff. The real advantage is that I can do this at my leisure from anywhere, so I could go home avoiding rent for the summer. I also would be able to attend a summer session my school runs in Europe which would be fun and take care of some credits.
The second is an in-house gig at a Fortune 500 company near my school. It offers the opportunity to work in all sorts of different stuff (regulatory, litigation, corporate, etc.) as interests and needs dictate, which is really cool. That said, it'll require staying in my school's city and working 9-5 all summer. The company's industry does interest me and touch on some cool issues, but it's a long way from criminal stuff which, see above, I find the most interesting.
Both positions pay pretty similar, but the in-house is better. If I'm home doing the RA thing I can make more money writing for other people and if I do the summer session thing I'll come out about even for the summer. I don't know if I'll have the energy for that if I do the in-house.
Am I crazy to even thinking about turning down the in-house thing? Part of me says I am. Are employers going to laugh at an RA job come OCI/Honors/whatever interviews? Are people going to find plan A evidence of laziness? Anyone do anything like either of these and willing to comment on what they're like? Thanks in advance.