...
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 5:56 pm
...
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=200655
I agree that grades matter for some people. My point was that they don't matter if you're landing a job based on connections which, IMO, is the most common way to get your second job after biglaw. At my firm, most people have the grades to land a lateral position at most biglaw firms, but I guess if you've slacked off to the point where your grades are below median, then yeah, you're screwed out of lateraling to another biglaw firm. But if you have to fall back on your grades to get you a job, you've kind of failed at networking. I don't know why you would think things would be better at a different biglaw firm if you're just relying on grades. Maybe you would like the area or people better, but sooner or later you're going to have to get into the business of getting to know clients and other lawyers to the point where you can sustain a career. I'm sure there are people who are satisfied to spend the rest of their lives eagerly taking work from people who are dumber than them and relying 100% on their credentials to get them work, but this seems like a much harder way of going about things.BruceWayne wrote:The above advice is great except the grades part. If you're only 3-5 years out of school not only do they give a flying F; it's one of the most important determinants of your options. It's a widely held tls myth that grades don't matter after your first job. That's true in the non biglaw world. But for biglaw and biglaw lateral feeder jobs it's not true at all. Our profession is obsessed with academics.
How much do grades matter after your first job? What are your plans after biglaw? Are you worried about the grade aspect?BruceWayne wrote:The above advice is great except the grades part. If you're only 3-5 years out of school not only do they give a flying F; it's one of the most important determinants of your options. It's a widely held tls myth that grades don't matter after your first job. That's true in the non biglaw world. But for biglaw and biglaw lateral feeder jobs it's not true at all. Our profession is obsessed with academics.
At what stage in your career do these relationships really matter? I'm not really sure I'm impressing a client enough for them to offer me a job when I do disclosure schedules o diligence really, really well...Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:I agree that grades matter for some people. My point was that they don't matter if you're landing a job based on connections which, IMO, is the most common way to get your second job after biglaw. At my firm, most people have the grades to land a lateral position at most biglaw firms, but I guess if you've slacked off to the point where your grades are below median, then yeah, you're screwed out of lateraling to another biglaw firm. But if you have to fall back on your grades to get you a job, you've kind of failed at networking. I don't know why you would think things would be better at a different biglaw firm if you're just relying on grades. Maybe you would like the area or people better, but sooner or later you're going to have to get into the business of getting to know clients and other lawyers to the point where you can sustain a career. I'm sure there are people who are satisfied to spend the rest of their lives eagerly taking work from people who are dumber than them and relying 100% on their credentials to get them work, but this seems like a much harder way of going about things.BruceWayne wrote:The above advice is great except the grades part. If you're only 3-5 years out of school not only do they give a flying F; it's one of the most important determinants of your options. It's a widely held tls myth that grades don't matter after your first job. That's true in the non biglaw world. But for biglaw and biglaw lateral feeder jobs it's not true at all. Our profession is obsessed with academics.
As soon as you get client contact, take advantage of it. Some people literally never get client contact at their biglaw firm, even after they become senior associates. Others get it right out of the gate. It really varies. If you never get significant client contact, your best resource would be attorneys you work with on a daily basis. They often DO have client contact and can hook you up with one of their friends' jobs.Anonymous User wrote:At what stage in your career do these relationships really matter? I'm not really sure I'm impressing a client enough for them to offer me a job when I do disclosure schedules o diligence really, really well...Biglaw_Associate_V20 wrote:I agree that grades matter for some people. My point was that they don't matter if you're landing a job based on connections which, IMO, is the most common way to get your second job after biglaw. At my firm, most people have the grades to land a lateral position at most biglaw firms, but I guess if you've slacked off to the point where your grades are below median, then yeah, you're screwed out of lateraling to another biglaw firm. But if you have to fall back on your grades to get you a job, you've kind of failed at networking. I don't know why you would think things would be better at a different biglaw firm if you're just relying on grades. Maybe you would like the area or people better, but sooner or later you're going to have to get into the business of getting to know clients and other lawyers to the point where you can sustain a career. I'm sure there are people who are satisfied to spend the rest of their lives eagerly taking work from people who are dumber than them and relying 100% on their credentials to get them work, but this seems like a much harder way of going about things.BruceWayne wrote:The above advice is great except the grades part. If you're only 3-5 years out of school not only do they give a flying F; it's one of the most important determinants of your options. It's a widely held tls myth that grades don't matter after your first job. That's true in the non biglaw world. But for biglaw and biglaw lateral feeder jobs it's not true at all. Our profession is obsessed with academics.
You'd be surprisedAnonymous User wrote:At what stage in your career do these relationships really matter? I'm not really sure I'm impressing a client enough for them to offer me a job when I do disclosure schedules o diligence really, really well...
As soon as you get client contact you start networking. Doesn't mean you can leverage it right away (ever) but it means that they get to know you and get to learn what kind of worker you are.Anonymous User wrote:I get plenty of client contact... But for completing disclosure schedules and diligence. That's whatim trying to say. I assume that the associate above me drafting the purchase agreement and getting client contact will be in a better position to impress and connect. I'm not complaining; I'm just wondering at what point do client connections matter to the point you can start networking for jobs...
Works fine for meanon168 wrote:Is the search function broken or did TLS disable it for the holidays?
Apparently not for the OP.dingbat wrote:Works fine for meanon168 wrote:Is the search function broken or did TLS disable it for the holidays?
Merry Christmas, anon168!anon168 wrote:Apparently not for the OP.dingbat wrote:Works fine for meanon168 wrote:Is the search function broken or did TLS disable it for the holidays?
anon168 wrote:Apparently not for the OP.dingbat wrote:Works fine for meanon168 wrote:Is the search function broken or did TLS disable it for the holidays?
I'm sorry, what do you do again dingbat? Are you in Biglaw or in law school or in college or what?dingbat wrote:anon168 wrote:Apparently not for the OP.dingbat wrote:Works fine for meanon168 wrote:Is the search function broken or did TLS disable it for the holidays?![]()
![]()
![]()
sorry; I was on my phone and this wooshed over my head
![]()
![]()
![]()