Page 1 of 3
top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:23 pm
by Anonymous User
No luck with OCI...destined for unemployment?
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:25 pm
by thelawyler
Considering that the vast majority of your class will not get jobs from OCI, I'd keep hustling. After all, I'm sure your school has a greater than 20% employment rate, so keep working.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:13 pm
by Anonnn
I'd be curious to know what tier 2 school dominates in its market. Thinking like somewhere in the Dakotas or Alaska? Just curious.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:20 pm
by ndirish2010
IU-Indy- though it doesn't exactly dominate.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:47 pm
by dood
wisconsin dominates its market (wisconsin)
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:49 pm
by JusticeHarlan
dood wrote:wisconsin dominates its market (wisconsin)
'sconsin isn't tier 2, dood.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:53 pm
by Anonymous User
Philly area t2
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:58 pm
by Lacepiece23
Anonnn wrote:I'd be curious to know what tier 2 school dominates in its market. Thinking like somewhere in the Dakotas or Alaska? Just curious.
Pitt dominates Pittsburgh.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:01 pm
by rebexness
Anonnn wrote:I'd be curious to know what tier 2 school dominates in its market. Thinking like somewhere in the Dakotas or Alaska? Just curious.
Neither of these areas has a T2 school.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:06 pm
by HeavenWood
Anonymous User wrote:Philly area t2
Unless Temple, Villanova, and RU-C suddenly merged, there's no such thing.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:08 pm
by BruceWayne
Cumberland does very very well in its market--although you can't say dominate because of the existence of Bama.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:08 pm
by Anonymous User
WUSTL
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:37 pm
by drmguy
Anonymous User wrote:Philly area t2
UPenn dominates Philly
NJ is split between the 3 NJ schools
I'm assuming it is RU-C because no one in their right mind would claim nova or temple dominate Philly. RU-C does not dominate its market.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:39 pm
by 20130312
drmguy wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Philly area t2
UPenn dominates Philly
wait wut
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:40 pm
by HeavenWood
drmguy wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Philly area t2
UPenn dominates Philly
NJ is split between the 3 NJ schools
I'm assuming it is RU-C because no one in their right mind would claim nova or temple dominate Philly. RU-C does not dominate its market.
Penn does not really dominate Philly because Penn self-selects into NYC/DC. Only the small (though not insignificant number) of Penn people with
strong Philly ties targeting the area dominate Philly.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:47 pm
by drmguy
Good job, critique the logic but not the conclusion. So you all think RU-C dominates its market?
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:48 pm
by ndirish2010
If RU-C's market is Philly, then no.
If RU-C's market is NJ, then still no.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:48 pm
by HeavenWood
drmguy wrote:Good job, critique the logic but not the conclusion. So you all think RU-C dominates its market?
Since it apparently bears repeating:
HeavenWood wrote:
Unless Temple, Villanova, and RU-C suddenly merged, there's no such thing.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:48 pm
by 20130312
drmguy wrote:Good job, critique the logic but not the conclusion. So you all think RU-C dominates its market?
Isn't it possible that no one school dominates the Philly market?
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:50 pm
by HeavenWood
InGoodFaith wrote:drmguy wrote:Good job, critique the logic but not the conclusion. So you all think RU-C dominates its market?
Isn't it possible that no one school dominates the Philly market?
Naw breh, every kingdom has a king.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:53 pm
by dingbat
ndirish2010 wrote:If RU-C's market is Philly, then no.
If RU-C's market is NJ, then still no.
If RU-C's market is Camden, then, fine, but that's still not a good thing
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:55 pm
by IAFG
This thread's gone in a really useful and helpful direction.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:55 pm
by HeavenWood
dingbat wrote:ndirish2010 wrote:If RU-C's market is Philly, then no.
If RU-C's market is NJ, then still no.
If RU-C's market is Camden, then, fine, but that's still not a good thing
RU-C roughly splits between Philly and South Jersey (which is an extension of the Philly legal market, with the exception of local PI/government).
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:55 pm
by drmguy
dingbat wrote:ndirish2010 wrote:If RU-C's market is Philly, then no.
If RU-C's market is NJ, then still no.
If RU-C's market is Camden, then, fine, but that's still not a good thing
RU-C has the Camden law student market locked down.
Re: top 20% tier 2 law school that dominates in its market.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:56 pm
by drmguy
IAFG wrote:This thread's gone in a really useful and helpful direction.
TLS cannot stand for such mischaracterizations.