Mayer Brown or Knobbe Martens -- IP Lit
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 2:35 pm
Hey guys,
I really need some insight here, and TLS was really helpful for me when I chose where to go to law schools. I've narrowed down my options to the two firms in the poll: Mayer Brown and Knobbe Martens. The two firms and markets are basically as opposite as it can be, with pros and cons for each. I'm interested in primarily IP lit. I have massive debt, ~200K -- paying that off will be my first priority. I have no long-term goals to go in-house or to the government, and would like to go somewhere where I could carve out a long-lasting career or have the exit-options to do so.
I've been doing as much research as possible, from reading threads to calling up associates. Here are some of my thoughts. If someone has first or second-hand experience with these firms, please let me know and I'll PM you.
Mayer Brown: People seem pretty chill. It's NYC market, and the firm is generally one of the better firms re: compensation. The IP department is leanly-staffed (slightly under 1:2 partner to associate ratio) and I would get lots of substantive experience and responsibility early on. Work hours seem pretty standard for NYC (8:30/9:30-7:00/8:00). Would get to work on a variety of cases. I have friend and family ties to NYC.
Knobbe Martens: People seem pretty content. A few socially awkward partners here and there, but still all-around nice people. Pays below market, and my understanding is their payscale is rather compressed until you reach partnership. Low leverage, with a 1:1 partner to associate ratio. Partnership is reasonably attainable with a track of 6 years, which means I would also get lots of substantive experience and responsibility early on. Firm follows unorthodox billed hours system, which is a subject of concern. The lifestyle aspect of the firm seems a bit oversold, but the hours would on average be 8:30-6 (so it seems at least one less hour per day compared to NYC). I have no ties in CA and would have to essentially start over in my late 20s.
Since the firms are in different markets, it feels very much like comparing apples to oranges. I would greatly appreciate any advice here.
EDIT: Removed poll because I really want to hear the reasoning.
I really need some insight here, and TLS was really helpful for me when I chose where to go to law schools. I've narrowed down my options to the two firms in the poll: Mayer Brown and Knobbe Martens. The two firms and markets are basically as opposite as it can be, with pros and cons for each. I'm interested in primarily IP lit. I have massive debt, ~200K -- paying that off will be my first priority. I have no long-term goals to go in-house or to the government, and would like to go somewhere where I could carve out a long-lasting career or have the exit-options to do so.
I've been doing as much research as possible, from reading threads to calling up associates. Here are some of my thoughts. If someone has first or second-hand experience with these firms, please let me know and I'll PM you.
Mayer Brown: People seem pretty chill. It's NYC market, and the firm is generally one of the better firms re: compensation. The IP department is leanly-staffed (slightly under 1:2 partner to associate ratio) and I would get lots of substantive experience and responsibility early on. Work hours seem pretty standard for NYC (8:30/9:30-7:00/8:00). Would get to work on a variety of cases. I have friend and family ties to NYC.
Knobbe Martens: People seem pretty content. A few socially awkward partners here and there, but still all-around nice people. Pays below market, and my understanding is their payscale is rather compressed until you reach partnership. Low leverage, with a 1:1 partner to associate ratio. Partnership is reasonably attainable with a track of 6 years, which means I would also get lots of substantive experience and responsibility early on. Firm follows unorthodox billed hours system, which is a subject of concern. The lifestyle aspect of the firm seems a bit oversold, but the hours would on average be 8:30-6 (so it seems at least one less hour per day compared to NYC). I have no ties in CA and would have to essentially start over in my late 20s.
Since the firms are in different markets, it feels very much like comparing apples to oranges. I would greatly appreciate any advice here.
EDIT: Removed poll because I really want to hear the reasoning.