Top Law Schools

Does anybody know? They aren't on NALP, and can't find that info on martindale either.

Oh, I thought the title said Conan Obrien

I almost said Conan O'Brien in my CB today.

The general consensus seems to be that they start at 95K. This, of course, relies heavily on anecdotal evidence, but it seems realistic for Philly.

Are you a 2L or a 3L? I'm a 3L and interviewed with them early last month, but I haven't heard back.

OP here - 2L.

Anonymous User wrote:The general consensus seems to be that they start at 95K. This, of course, relies heavily on anecdotal evidence, but it seems realistic for Philly.

Are you a 2L or a 3L? I'm a 3L and interviewed with them early last month, but I haven't heard back.

Where does one usually find this kind of information? Curious about this for other firms that aren't listed on NALP.

Anonymous User wrote:The general consensus seems to be that they start at 95K. This, of course, relies heavily on anecdotal evidence, but it seems realistic for Philly.

Are you a 2L or a 3L? I'm a 3L and interviewed with them early last month, but I haven't heard back.

Realistic for Philly in what sense? If you mean realistic for a small, but illustrious litigation boutique, I agree.

ben4847 wrote:Oh, I thought the title said Conan Obrien

I thought I was the only one.

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:The general consensus seems to be that they start at 95K. This, of course, relies heavily on anecdotal evidence, but it seems realistic for Philly.

Are you a 2L or a 3L? I'm a 3L and interviewed with them early last month, but I haven't heard back.

Realistic for Philly in what sense? If you mean realistic for a small, but illustrious litigation boutique, I agree.

They upped their compensation by $20K. Competitive for Philly.

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:The general consensus seems to be that they start at 95K. This, of course, relies heavily on anecdotal evidence, but it seems realistic for Philly.

Are you a 2L or a 3L? I'm a 3L and interviewed with them early last month, but I haven't heard back.

Realistic for Philly in what sense? If you mean realistic for a small, but illustrious litigation boutique, I agree.

They upped their compensation by $20K. Competitive for Philly.

And what compensation is that?

...

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:The general consensus seems to be that they start at 95K. This, of course, relies heavily on anecdotal evidence, but it seems realistic for Philly.

Are you a 2L or a 3L? I'm a 3L and interviewed with them early last month, but I haven't heard back.

Realistic for Philly in what sense? If you mean realistic for a small, but illustrious litigation boutique, I agree.

They upped their compensation by $20K. Competitive for Philly.

And what compensation is that?

95 + 20 = You do the math

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote: Realistic for Philly in what sense? If you mean realistic for a small, but illustrious litigation boutique, I agree.

They upped their compensation by $20K. Competitive for Philly.

And what compensation is that?

95 + 20 = You do the math

It wasn't entirely clear whether that initial $95k figure was "confirmed," that's why I asked for clarification. But the point is moot for me anyway, since they filled their class size of two and I wasn't one of those offered.

Correct. They are 115K, the managing partner randomly dropped the salary during my screener with them.

My friend knows one of the two who accepted. I understand both are from Penn and the salary was reported in the one-twenties. Makes sense to be competitive. For the heck of it I checked their web site, looked impressive to me, wish I had thought of them.