Page 1 of 1

chambers associate missing firms

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:33 pm
by fatduck
what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?

Re: chambers associate missing firms

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:42 pm
by LawIdiot86
fatduck wrote:what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?
Giving some of the firms you have discovered to be missing might be helpful? Wilson Elser, a non-NALP firm is there, so it isn't as narrow as NALP was or is. Maybe the firm's small? Or too generalist to trigger a category listing?

Re: chambers associate missing firms

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:45 pm
by clintonius
LawIdiot86 wrote:
fatduck wrote:what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?
Giving some of the firms you have discovered to be missing might be helpful? Wilson Elser, a non-NALP firm is there, so it isn't as narrow as NALP was or is. Maybe the firm's small? Or too generalist to trigger a category listing?
You're thinking Chambers & Partners, the site that rates practice areas. Chambers Associate gives an overview of the firm to help prospective associates differentiate between places.

Re: chambers associate missing firms

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:46 pm
by fatduck
LawIdiot86 wrote:
fatduck wrote:what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?
Giving some of the firms you have discovered to be missing might be helpful? Wilson Elser, a non-NALP firm is there, so it isn't as narrow as NALP was or is. Maybe the firm's small? Or too generalist to trigger a category listing?
sorry i thought i included that in the OP. i noticed covington was missing, which prompted this thread.

Re: chambers associate missing firms

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:49 pm
by LawIdiot86
clintonius wrote:
LawIdiot86 wrote:
fatduck wrote:what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?
Giving some of the firms you have discovered to be missing might be helpful? Wilson Elser, a non-NALP firm is there, so it isn't as narrow as NALP was or is. Maybe the firm's small? Or too generalist to trigger a category listing?
You're thinking Chambers & Partners, the site that rates practice areas. Chambers Associate gives an overview of the firm to help prospective associates differentiate between places.
Ahh, my bad. I have the old 2010 edition of Chambers Associates that lists almost all of the major firms, including Covington. If anyone thinks such information could be useful, PM.

Re: chambers associate missing firms

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:50 pm
by anon168
fatduck wrote:what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?

Because you have to pay to play.

Re: chambers associate missing firms

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:53 pm
by fatduck
anon168 wrote:
fatduck wrote:what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?

Because you have to pay to play.
ah. in that case, i respect their principled holdout.