chambers associate missing firms
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:33 pm
what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=192395
Giving some of the firms you have discovered to be missing might be helpful? Wilson Elser, a non-NALP firm is there, so it isn't as narrow as NALP was or is. Maybe the firm's small? Or too generalist to trigger a category listing?fatduck wrote:what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?
You're thinking Chambers & Partners, the site that rates practice areas. Chambers Associate gives an overview of the firm to help prospective associates differentiate between places.LawIdiot86 wrote:Giving some of the firms you have discovered to be missing might be helpful? Wilson Elser, a non-NALP firm is there, so it isn't as narrow as NALP was or is. Maybe the firm's small? Or too generalist to trigger a category listing?fatduck wrote:what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?
sorry i thought i included that in the OP. i noticed covington was missing, which prompted this thread.LawIdiot86 wrote:Giving some of the firms you have discovered to be missing might be helpful? Wilson Elser, a non-NALP firm is there, so it isn't as narrow as NALP was or is. Maybe the firm's small? Or too generalist to trigger a category listing?fatduck wrote:what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?
Ahh, my bad. I have the old 2010 edition of Chambers Associates that lists almost all of the major firms, including Covington. If anyone thinks such information could be useful, PM.clintonius wrote:You're thinking Chambers & Partners, the site that rates practice areas. Chambers Associate gives an overview of the firm to help prospective associates differentiate between places.LawIdiot86 wrote:Giving some of the firms you have discovered to be missing might be helpful? Wilson Elser, a non-NALP firm is there, so it isn't as narrow as NALP was or is. Maybe the firm's small? Or too generalist to trigger a category listing?fatduck wrote:what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?
fatduck wrote:what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?
ah. in that case, i respect their principled holdout.anon168 wrote:fatduck wrote:what are we to assume about firms who are conspicuously absent from chambers associate? something to hide?
Because you have to pay to play.