Page 1 of 1

Resume - Quality v. Quantity

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:17 am
by Anonymous User
I have had 4 legal positions since starting law school (in order): a midlaw SA, a RA job (that I've had for a year), an externship at a gov't agency, and 2L law clerk job. I may either end up getting a part-time law clerk position to supplement my income or volunteer at a big name PI organization.

I BARELY have room on my resume for what I have now without losing detail.

If I get the paying gig, should I punt the RA job to "Activities" to make room, or should I make room for 5 jobs by cutting a bulletpoint on each job? (Alternatively, if I get the PI position, should I just put the PI position under a new "Pro Bono Activity" section, or call it a job and trim my current WE?)

Any feedback would be appreciated.

Re: Resume - Quality v. Quantity

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 12:52 am
by thesealocust
Probably cut bullet points. Most people skim resumes and nothing more.

At this stage, most of your experience is totally self-explanatory anyway. The bullets aren't adding much.

Re: Resume - Quality v. Quantity

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 1:20 am
by JJW
To make more room, sometimes going from a 12 font size to an 11 or ever so slightly adjusting the margins could do the trick. Perhaps place your address on one line and/or phone and email on one line. Not everyone agrees, but it is either that or delete some of your info.

Re: Resume - Quality v. Quantity

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 11:39 am
by kalvano
Do you have work experience prior to school? Because I do, and I have several lines for that, plus 6 legal jobs, and I fit it all on there. You've got too much extra crap if you're having trouble fitting 4 legal jobs on there.

Re: Resume - Quality v. Quantity

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 5:14 pm
by NoleinNY
.

Re: Resume - Quality v. Quantity

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 5:27 pm
by ggocat
thesealocust wrote:Probably cut bullet points. Most people skim resumes and nothing more.

At this stage, most of your experience is totally self-explanatory anyway. The bullets aren't adding much.
This.

Re: Resume - Quality v. Quantity

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 5:41 pm
by eandy
Don't use bullet points at all.

Re: Resume - Quality v. Quantity

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 6:00 pm
by AllTheLawz
eandy wrote:Don't use bullet points at all.
If you really, really cant cut anything then switch from bullet points to paragraph format. In general, though, I would recommend bullet points as they help drive the conversation and give the interviewer an easy way to break it down and ask something other than "so tell me about your time at x"

Re: Resume - Quality v. Quantity

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:21 pm
by rad lulz
AllTheLawz wrote:
eandy wrote:Don't use bullet points at all.
If you really, really cant cut anything then switch from bullet points to paragraph format. In general, though, I would recommend bullet points as they help drive the conversation and give the interviewer an easy way to break it down and ask something other than "so tell me about your time at x"
I used paragraphs (wanted to keep a couple relevant summer things from UG) so I coul save a couple lines and noticed no ill effects.

Re: Resume - Quality v. Quantity

Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:55 pm
by shock259
CLS tells us to use paragraphs instead of bullets. It helped me save a few lines and doesn't seem to have adversely affected me.

I also still have an undergrad supervisor job on my resume but no one has ever asked about it. I'm pretty sure they just skim over the first 1-2 jobs unless something really catches their eye.

Re: Resume - Quality v. Quantity

Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:19 am
by Anonymous User
I'm in the same boat. I had three internships in college, and another four jobs after college, all quite substantive. I had to cut things like an interest or special skills section. I think I used size 11 font and Garamond (which saves a lot of room). I also had to summarize just the key things, like "Published an original research work on X" or "researched wrote memoranda on X, Y, and Z topics."