Firm Names
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 1:35 pm
During interviews is it ok to call them by a shortened name? Like Fried Frank? Or do you have to refer to them as Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=190814
Lulz.Anonymous User wrote:During interviews is it ok to call them by a shortened name? Like Fried Frank? Or do you have to refer to them as Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson.
HTH broAnonymous User wrote:Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
mofo.comze2151 wrote:serious question? if serious, why post anon?
yes, no one expects you to say "cadwalader, wickersham, and taft" every time you mention the firm name. your interviewer wouldn't do that. also, look at some of the website names for firms.
alston.com
mckennalong.com
sutherland.com
milbank.com
kasowitz.com
skadden.com
they're giving you permission.
What is this, amateur hour?rad lulz wrote:HTH broAnonymous User wrote:Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & JacobsonLLPLimited Liability Partnership
fwiw, my interviewer asked "so why are you interested in MoFo?"JusticeHarlan wrote: mofo.com
I can't really picture you stylin on dem Shearman bros now what you're engaged.fatduck wrote:fwiw, my interviewer asked "so why are you interested in MoFo?"JusticeHarlan wrote: mofo.com
not sure the patent group qualifies as ALPHA AS FUCKrad lulz wrote:I can't really picture you stylin on dem Shearman bros now what you're engaged.fatduck wrote:fwiw, my interviewer asked "so why are you interested in MoFo?"JusticeHarlan wrote: mofo.com