Top Law Schools

What kind of grades from MVP?

Anonymous User wrote:What kind of grades from MVP?

Also interested. Just outside the T14, Top 20%, Law Review.

This thread is painfully lazy and useless. "I'm at one of the following schools and, presumably, already have all my grades. Instead of me putting some effort into gauging my chances, I'd prefer you tell me all the grade ranges necessary at a number of schools. Also, I'm working under the mistaken assumption that it's all grades."

Bildungsroman wrote:This thread is painfully lazy and useless. "I'm at one of the following schools and, presumably, already have all my grades. Instead of me putting some effort into gauging my chances, I'd prefer you tell me all the grade ranges necessary at a number of schools. Also, I'm working under the mistaken assumption that it's all grades."

You are an ass.

portaprokoss wrote:

Bildungsroman wrote:This thread is painfully lazy and useless. "I'm at one of the following schools and, presumably, already have all my grades. Instead of me putting some effort into gauging my chances, I'd prefer you tell me all the grade ranges necessary at a number of schools. Also, I'm working under the mistaken assumption that it's all grades."

You are an ass.

Sure, maybe. But they're already posting anonymously. Posting their school and rank or GPA would actually give someone a shot at offering useful advice.

Bildungsroman is right.

Having said that: It's very selective. There aren't many big firms in DC (i.e. large firms with large summer classes) and A&P is top-flight amongst them. Williams & Connolly, Covington, A&P, Wilmer and Hogan compete for the best students. There are other (good) firms in DC, but those are the big and selective ones.

Grades wise, you need really good ones (not like top 10% absolutely required, but almost always well above median) even from a T14 - and work experience / reasons for wanting DC or the practice area specialty of the firm are also a big boost.

Bildungsroman wrote:

portaprokoss wrote:

Bildungsroman wrote:This thread is painfully lazy and useless. "I'm at one of the following schools and, presumably, already have all my grades. Instead of me putting some effort into gauging my chances, I'd prefer you tell me all the grade ranges necessary at a number of schools. Also, I'm working under the mistaken assumption that it's all grades."

You are an ass.

Sure, maybe. But they're already posting anonymously. Posting their school and rank or GPA would actually give someone a shot at offering useful advice.

I'm OP. I don't really value some random law student's worthless opinion on my softs. I'm not going to rely on some stranger's fine-tuned calculation of my chances at a an individual firm. I don't think the type of people who could actually give such specific, worthwhile advice on that firm are cruising TLS on a Saturday afternoon. Rather, I'm looking for a simple answer that won't waste anyone's time. Something like: probably top half, generally top quarter + LR.

Something like this:

"Grades wise, you need really good ones (not like top 10% absolutely required, but almost always well above median) even from a T14 - and work experience / reasons for wanting DC or the practice area specialty of the firm are also a big boost."


thank you, thesealocust.

I can't comprehend that there are people out there who have nothing better to do than cruise the internet calling people stupid.

portaprokoss wrote:

Bildungsroman wrote:

portaprokoss wrote:

Bildungsroman wrote:This thread is painfully lazy and useless. "I'm at one of the following schools and, presumably, already have all my grades. Instead of me putting some effort into gauging my chances, I'd prefer you tell me all the grade ranges necessary at a number of schools. Also, I'm working under the mistaken assumption that it's all grades."

You are an ass.

Sure, maybe. But they're already posting anonymously. Posting their school and rank or GPA would actually give someone a shot at offering useful advice.

I'm OP. I don't really value some random law student's worthless opinion on my softs. I'm not going to rely on some stranger's fine-tuned calculation of my chances at a an individual firm. I don't think the type of people who could actually give such specific, worthwhile advice on that firm are cruising TLS on a Saturday afternoon. Rather, I'm looking for a simple answer that won't waste anyone's time. Something like: probably top half, generally top quarter + LR.

Something like this:

"Grades wise, you need really good ones (not like top 10% absolutely required, but almost always well above median) even from a T14 - and work experience / reasons for wanting DC or the practice area specialty of the firm are also a big boost."


thank you, thesealocust.

I never people who have nothing better to do than cruise the internet calling people stupid.

If you aren't above top quarter, even with LR its going to be a rough road unless you have pretty extensive DC connections (think political career before law school) and are a really good interviewer. You certainly can try, but it's very unlikely.

chasgoose wrote:If you aren't above top quarter, even with LR its going to be a rough road unless you have pretty extensive DC connections (think political career before law school) and are a really good interviewer. You certainly can try, but it's very unlikely.

Thank you

Anecdotal: A good number of people above top 10% at my T6 did not get callbacks at A&P DC. Seems to require more than just good grades.

A&P along with W&C, Cov, and Wilmer are considered the "top" of the DC market if we're talking firm-wide prestige rather than specific practice groups. They are very selective and outside of Harvard/Yale, they only take at most 1-2 students for the rest of the T14. Almost all of their summers have top grades and law review.

They also take folks who don't have top grades but legit DC connections and previous DC related work experience. If you either have top grades from a top school or if you have relevant DC work experience (such as working on the Hill) then you should bid.

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:What kind of grades from MVP?

Also interested. Just outside the T14, Top 20%, Law Review.

no chance unless you have previous DC work experience that would be considered relevant to A&P's practice

for example if you worked for years as an aid to a congressman then you would have a decent shot....otherwise you are wasting your time

Loads of stupid information here thus far. A&P summer here.

A&P DC has 21 summers, ranging from HLS + LR to below T100 + LR. Almost a majority of the summers are non-T14. Fewer than a handful aren't on LR at their respective schools. Top of the class + LR seems more important than pedigree. The MVP student I know there graded on to LR; it actually seems like nearly everyone at the DC office, regardless of school, graded onto LR. A decent chunk of the summers are K-JD from these schools, which makes the previous comment from Magnificent particularly dumb (shocking, I know).

You're better off Top 5% + LR at W&M, W&L, or WUSTL than you are Top 25% at MVP (though Top 20% + LR has a shot). The office is very, very, very focused on personality and a diversity of practice interests.

Anonymous User wrote:Loads of stupid information here thus far. A&P summer here.

A&P DC has 21 summers, ranging from HLS + LR to below T100 + LR. Almost a majority of the summers are non-T14. Fewer than a handful aren't on LR at their respective schools. Top of the class + LR seems more important than pedigree. The MVP student I know there graded on to LR; it actually seems like nearly everyone at the DC office, regardless of school, graded onto LR. A decent chunk of the summers are K-JD from these schools, which makes the previous comment from Magnificent particularly dumb (shocking, I know).

You're better off Top 5% + LR at W&M, W&L, or WUSTL than you are Top 25% at MVP (though Top 20% + LR has a shot). The office is very, very, very focused on personality and a diversity of practice interests.

This is very helpful. How about top 20% +LR from Vandy?

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:Loads of stupid information here thus far. A&P summer here.

A&P DC has 21 summers, ranging from HLS + LR to below T100 + LR. Almost a majority of the summers are non-T14. Fewer than a handful aren't on LR at their respective schools. Top of the class + LR seems more important than pedigree. The MVP student I know there graded on to LR; it actually seems like nearly everyone at the DC office, regardless of school, graded onto LR. A decent chunk of the summers are K-JD from these schools, which makes the previous comment from Magnificent particularly dumb (shocking, I know).

You're better off Top 5% + LR at W&M, W&L, or WUSTL than you are Top 25% at MVP (though Top 20% + LR has a shot). The office is very, very, very focused on personality and a diversity of practice interests.

This is very helpful. How about top 20% +LR from Vandy?

I think it's unlikely, but you wouldn't be laughed out of an interview. You'll probably have a better shot if you're not just interested in litigation. Better if you express some interest in corporate or regulatory work.

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:Loads of stupid information here thus far. A&P summer here.

A&P DC has 21 summers, ranging from HLS + LR to below T100 + LR. Almost a majority of the summers are non-T14. Fewer than a handful aren't on LR at their respective schools. Top of the class + LR seems more important than pedigree. The MVP student I know there graded on to LR; it actually seems like nearly everyone at the DC office, regardless of school, graded onto LR. A decent chunk of the summers are K-JD from these schools, which makes the previous comment from Magnificent particularly dumb (shocking, I know).

You're better off Top 5% + LR at W&M, W&L, or WUSTL than you are Top 25% at MVP (though Top 20% + LR has a shot). The office is very, very, very focused on personality and a diversity of practice interests.

This is very helpful. How about top 20% +LR from Vandy?

I think it's unlikely, but you wouldn't be laughed out of an interview. You'll probably have a better shot if you're not just interested in litigation. Better if you express some interest in corporate or regulatory work.

Is this true for most DC firms? What about NYC?

Magnificent wrote:A&P along with W&C, Cov, and Wilmer are considered the "top" of the DC market if we're talking firm-wide prestige rather than specific practice groups. They are very selective and outside of Harvard/Yale, they only take at most 1-2 students for the rest of the T14. Almost all of their summers have top grades and law review.

lol @ anti-Stanford trolling

Anonymous User wrote:

Magnificent wrote:A&P along with W&C, Cov, and Wilmer are considered the "top" of the DC market if we're talking firm-wide prestige rather than specific practice groups. They are very selective and outside of Harvard/Yale, they only take at most 1-2 students for the rest of the T14. Almost all of their summers have top grades and law review.

lol @ anti-Stanford trolling

Particularly since SLS has the most total summers at A&P this year.

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:Loads of stupid information here thus far. A&P summer here.

A&P DC has 21 summers, ranging from HLS + LR to below T100 + LR. Almost a majority of the summers are non-T14. Fewer than a handful aren't on LR at their respective schools. Top of the class + LR seems more important than pedigree. The MVP student I know there graded on to LR; it actually seems like nearly everyone at the DC office, regardless of school, graded onto LR. A decent chunk of the summers are K-JD from these schools, which makes the previous comment from Magnificent particularly dumb (shocking, I know).

You're better off Top 5% + LR at W&M, W&L, or WUSTL than you are Top 25% at MVP (though Top 20% + LR has a shot). The office is very, very, very focused on personality and a diversity of practice interests.

This is very helpful. How about top 20% +LR from Vandy?

I think it's unlikely, but you wouldn't be laughed out of an interview. You'll probably have a better shot if you're not just interested in litigation. Better if you express some interest in corporate or regulatory work.

How does one reconcile the above comment with this comment:

magnificent wrote:

top 20%, just outside the T14, Law Review [me]
no chance unless you have previous DC work experience that would be considered relevant to A&P's practice

for example if you worked for years as an aid to a congressman then you would have a decent shot....otherwise you are wasting your time

Note, I am not the Vandy person. I am a UT person. But would not the same advice apply?

Perseus_I wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:Loads of stupid information here thus far. A&P summer here.

A&P DC has 21 summers, ranging from HLS + LR to below T100 + LR. Almost a majority of the summers are non-T14. Fewer than a handful aren't on LR at their respective schools. Top of the class + LR seems more important than pedigree. The MVP student I know there graded on to LR; it actually seems like nearly everyone at the DC office, regardless of school, graded onto LR. A decent chunk of the summers are K-JD from these schools, which makes the previous comment from Magnificent particularly dumb (shocking, I know).

You're better off Top 5% + LR at W&M, W&L, or WUSTL than you are Top 25% at MVP (though Top 20% + LR has a shot). The office is very, very, very focused on personality and a diversity of practice interests.

This is very helpful. How about top 20% +LR from Vandy?

I think it's unlikely, but you wouldn't be laughed out of an interview. You'll probably have a better shot if you're not just interested in litigation. Better if you express some interest in corporate or regulatory work.

How does one reconcile the above comment with this comment:

magnificent wrote:

top 20%, just outside the T14, Law Review [me]
no chance unless you have previous DC work experience that would be considered relevant to A&P's practice

for example if you worked for years as an aid to a congressman then you would have a decent shot....otherwise you are wasting your time

Note, I am not the Vandy person. I am a UT person. But would not the same advice apply?

I'm the Vandy anon. One answer was from magnificent and one was from the A&P SA-thats how.

Anonymous User wrote:Loads of stupid information here thus far. A&P summer here.

A&P DC has 21 summers, ranging from HLS + LR to below T100 + LR. Almost a majority of the summers are non-T14. Fewer than a handful aren't on LR at their respective schools. Top of the class + LR seems more important than pedigree. The MVP student I know there graded on to LR; it actually seems like nearly everyone at the DC office, regardless of school, graded onto LR. A decent chunk of the summers are K-JD from these schools, which makes the previous comment from Magnificent particularly dumb (shocking, I know).

You're better off Top 5% + LR at W&M, W&L, or WUSTL than you are Top 25% at MVP (though Top 20% + LR has a shot). The office is very, very, very focused on personality and a diversity of practice interests.

If this is true then the W&C partner I talked with last year wasn't lying. A&P really has fallen off and is no longer part of the elite in DC. You know your firm has fallen off when it is take in more summers from outside the T14 than in the T14.

Silly me for assuming A&P was on the same level as the rest of the elite firms in DC.

Magnificent wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:Loads of stupid information here thus far. A&P summer here.

A&P DC has 21 summers, ranging from HLS + LR to below T100 + LR. Almost a majority of the summers are non-T14. Fewer than a handful aren't on LR at their respective schools. Top of the class + LR seems more important than pedigree. The MVP student I know there graded on to LR; it actually seems like nearly everyone at the DC office, regardless of school, graded onto LR. A decent chunk of the summers are K-JD from these schools, which makes the previous comment from Magnificent particularly dumb (shocking, I know).

You're better off Top 5% + LR at W&M, W&L, or WUSTL than you are Top 25% at MVP (though Top 20% + LR has a shot). The office is very, very, very focused on personality and a diversity of practice interests.

If this is true then the W&C partner I talked with last year wasn't lying. A&P really has fallen off and is no longer part of the elite in DC. You know your firm has fallen off when it is take in more summers from outside the T14 than in the T14.

Silly me for assuming A&P was on the same level as the rest of the elite firms in DC.

Cute

Magnificent wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:Loads of stupid information here thus far. A&P summer here.

A&P DC has 21 summers, ranging from HLS + LR to below T100 + LR. Almost a majority of the summers are non-T14. Fewer than a handful aren't on LR at their respective schools. Top of the class + LR seems more important than pedigree. The MVP student I know there graded on to LR; it actually seems like nearly everyone at the DC office, regardless of school, graded onto LR. A decent chunk of the summers are K-JD from these schools, which makes the previous comment from Magnificent particularly dumb (shocking, I know).

You're better off Top 5% + LR at W&M, W&L, or WUSTL than you are Top 25% at MVP (though Top 20% + LR has a shot). The office is very, very, very focused on personality and a diversity of practice interests.

If this is true then the W&C partner I talked with last year wasn't lying. A&P really has fallen off and is no longer part of the elite in DC. You know your firm has fallen off when it is take in more summers from outside the T14 than in the T14.

Silly me for assuming A&P was on the same level as the rest of the elite firms in DC.

Anonymous User wrote:

Magnificent wrote:A&P along with W&C, Cov, and Wilmer are considered the "top" of the DC market if we're talking firm-wide prestige rather than specific practice groups. They are very selective and outside of Harvard/Yale, they only take at most 1-2 students for the rest of the T14. Almost all of their summers have top grades and law review.

lol @ anti-Stanford trolling

nothing against Stanford but there just aren't many of them in DC

most of the top DC firms are filled with Harvard and Yale folks......the Stanford kids are smart enough to stay in the West Coast during the summers rather than coming to DC and living in the humid swamp

Magnificent wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

Magnificent wrote:A&P along with W&C, Cov, and Wilmer are considered the "top" of the DC market if we're talking firm-wide prestige rather than specific practice groups. They are very selective and outside of Harvard/Yale, they only take at most 1-2 students for the rest of the T14. Almost all of their summers have top grades and law review.

lol @ anti-Stanford trolling

nothing against Stanford but there just aren't many of them in DC

most of the top DC firms are filled with Harvard and Yale folks......the Stanford kids are smart enough to stay in the West Coast during the summers rather than coming to DC and living in the humid swamp

I remember meeting a ton of Stanford grads in DC when I was working there. E.g. Hogan's SA class that summer had the largest representation from Stanford. They have the same per capita in Hogan's DC office as Harvard, more than Yale.