boutique firms
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:09 am
What's the best resource for researching boutique law firms?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=189035
Depends on the type of boutique we are talking about.Anonymous User wrote:What are the benefits of a top boutique firm over biglaw? Downsides?
I'm sure it varies, but can you give any insight on earnings potential? How does the partnership potential of a boutique firm compare with the (presumably) higher starting salary of biglaw?reasonable_man wrote:I work at a very small firm (between 5 and 10 attorneys) in NYC. I left a larger firm of about 95 lawyers to join this firm 2 years ago. 96% of the time I love it. I'll jump in throughout this conversation with my two cents.
I find the term boutique firm to be sort of dumb. But whatever. My firm qualifies, I guess, because at least half of our practice is a very specialized field and we are considered one of the better firms around that practice in that area. Some of the major benefits are early high level experieince. Im a 2008 grad. I've second chaired a few major trials and I've argued an appeal solo (and probably 2 dozen Motions for summary judgment). That won't occur at a large firm.
As far as money goes, it very much depends on the type of work the firm does. My hours are far less (in total number), but I do not earn biglaw money. I do however earn more than 100k and my bonuses are pretty good. In short, its not bad.Anonymous User wrote:I'm sure it varies, but can you give any insight on earnings potential? How does the partnership potential of a boutique firm compare with the (presumably) higher starting salary of biglaw?reasonable_man wrote:I work at a very small firm (between 5 and 10 attorneys) in NYC. I left a larger firm of about 95 lawyers to join this firm 2 years ago. 96% of the time I love it. I'll jump in throughout this conversation with my two cents.
I find the term boutique firm to be sort of dumb. But whatever. My firm qualifies, I guess, because at least half of our practice is a very specialized field and we are considered one of the better firms around that practice in that area. Some of the major benefits are early high level experieince. Im a 2008 grad. I've second chaired a few major trials and I've argued an appeal solo (and probably 2 dozen Motions for summary judgment). That won't occur at a large firm.
This is where a lot of people distinguish a "boutique" from a small firm.reasonable_man wrote:As far as money goes, it very much depends on the type of work the firm does. My hours are far less (in total number), but I do not earn biglaw money. I do however earn more than 100k and my bonuses are pretty good. In short, its not bad.Anonymous User wrote:I'm sure it varies, but can you give any insight on earnings potential? How does the partnership potential of a boutique firm compare with the (presumably) higher starting salary of biglaw?reasonable_man wrote:I work at a very small firm (between 5 and 10 attorneys) in NYC. I left a larger firm of about 95 lawyers to join this firm 2 years ago. 96% of the time I love it. I'll jump in throughout this conversation with my two cents.
I find the term boutique firm to be sort of dumb. But whatever. My firm qualifies, I guess, because at least half of our practice is a very specialized field and we are considered one of the better firms around that practice in that area. Some of the major benefits are early high level experieince. Im a 2008 grad. I've second chaired a few major trials and I've argued an appeal solo (and probably 2 dozen Motions for summary judgment). That won't occur at a large firm.
The partnership potential also depends on the size of the firm and the firm's attitude toward partnership. In my case, I believe that partnership is a pretty good possibility several years down the line (and my boss has hinted at this in many conversations.