Top Law Schools

GULC rising 2L here. Anyone know what the situation is for international firms? I hear London is prestige-whorey, but Asia is easier.

I have a ton of international experience, as well as fluency in 2 marketable foreign languages, including Chinese. I also have shitty grades (just above bottom 1/3 of the class).

Should I bid on prestige firms that have international offices? Or would that be a waste? Should I mass mail them instead? Which markets would be easiest?

Thanks in advance.

just mass mail, although i think they prefer someone with post-JD experiences.

do you read those foreign languages too? I doubt that just speaking it will be of help. I know a guy from a T25 who speaks fluent chinese and who spent a year teaching in beijing. he's out of luck completely. you are from georgetown and so are in a better position, though.

OP: "Fluency in Chinese" ? This applies to reading & writing, but your dialect should also be noted.

P.S. What are your two marketable foreign languages ?

Go big on Asia. There are more SA spots in US/UK firms in China than there are T14 grads who speak Chinese and want to go to China. I know someone who had terrible grades (like bottom 10% at a CCN) who spoke Chinese and got multiple biglaw offers for various US and UK firm offices in Shanghai, Beijing or Hong Kong.

Depending on the other languages, they could also help. Portuguese is especially helpful as a lot of firms are opening offices in Brazil, and Korean might be appealing since many firms are now preparing to open their first offices in South Korea after the government there lifted its ban on foreign practitioners.

Offers from Shanghai, Beijing & Hong Kong would require fluency in two dialects ( Mandarin & Cantonese).

Agree that Portuguese will get offers in Brazil with US firms.

Fluency means reading and writing right? Does being fluent in speaking the language count at all?

if you are very good (great grades) you don't need to know a word of chinese to get an offer.

don't overestimate the ease in getting an offer in one of those offices. they prefer people who read and write chinese like a native does because that level of proficiency is required in document review/due diligence work. many americans who know chinese only speak the language.

I don't think bottom 1/3 people can really "waste" bids on anything other than V20s. In your case, bidding the fuck out of international offices is really credited. Also, extensive massmailing.

by the way, is it even possible to be very fluent in the language without knowing how to write or read it?
don't overestimate your level of competence.
I haven't learned chinese and I have no idea at all.

Anonymous User wrote:Fluency means reading and writing right? Does being fluent in speaking the language count at all?

it may count a little, but without reading/writing, i don't think you're as fluent speaking it as you think you are. a good test would be if you were handed a NY Times article. would you be able to translate it without stumbling and substituting English words?

f0bolous wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:Fluency means reading and writing right? Does being fluent in speaking the language count at all?

it may count a little, but without reading/writing, i don't think you're as fluent speaking it as you think you are

exactly.... unless you are one of those American-born chinese who were taught to speak since you were a kid but never practice writing or reading it..

Fluency usually means reading, writing & speaking unless specified otherwise. With respect to Chinese, reading & writing is the same language but speaking has many different dialects. Hong Kong uses Cantonese whereas Beijing & Shanghai use Mandarin. Other parts of China speak entirely different dialects.

Spanish doesn't work for all of Spain. In Barcelona, the language is Catalan, for example.

didi wrote:

f0bolous wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:Fluency means reading and writing right? Does being fluent in speaking the language count at all?

it may count a little, but without reading/writing, i don't think you're as fluent speaking it as you think you are

exactly.... unless you are one of those American-born chinese who were taught to speak since you were a kid but never practice writing or reading it..

even then, the vocabulary would be severely lacking. it's like asking someone with a kindergartener level language skills to do legal work.

really?! are they that bad?!

You are right about the kindergarten-level-doing-legal-work though. I spent several years learning french but I could not use it professionally and therefore never put it in my firm biography

edit: by the way, I am sure a few ABCs I know do not hold themselves to such a high standard like you and canadianwolf do. I doubt they read much chinese. Yet they also put 'chinese' in their biographies.

我覺得不懂中文又強裝懂的,真的很討厭!

Bid 'em. I'm a GULC bottom 1/3er (and that's being generous) with a V100 SA, so it's not a waste of your time to try.

CanadianWolf wrote:Fluency usually means reading, writing & speaking unless specified otherwise. With respect to Chinese, reading & writing is the same language but speaking has many different dialects. Hong Kong uses Cantonese whereas Beijing & Shanghai use Mandarin. Other parts of China speak entirely different dialects.

Spanish doesn't work for all of Spain. In Barcelona, the language is Catalan, for example.

This is very true. I had to do legal-specific reading & writing training to be confident enough to put it on my resume. However, if you are fluent in reading & writing in any of Korean, Japanese, or Manda Chinese, you are good with the character part since they share chinese character for more expertise related words - given you know the grammars.

I know speak fluent Korean & Japanese. But my Manda Chinese speaking ability is middle school lev. but my reading and writing for all three languages are good - native fluency in Korean & Japanese, and legal specific in Manda Chinese. I also semi-speak Xibe language and a little Machu language - there are only 70 of us in the world with only 20 speaking with native fluency - which I am thinking to use as a diversity booster.

I love learning language and I am thinking I should add another to my resume. what language is best for an international corporate law?

English.

CanadianWolf wrote:English.

true. i only speak a little of that. and my reading and writing sucks.

English/Spanish/Portuguese combination as well as English/ Chinese with either Mandarin or Cantonese dialect. Jobs available overseas with English/Japanese as well.

Russian tends to be useless as almost all educated Russians are fluent in English.

Civil law countries: French/English for France. Lots of opportunities for McGill law graduates.

CanadianWolf wrote:English/Spanish/Portuguese combination as well as English/ Chinese with either Mandarin or Cantonese dialect. Jobs available overseas with English/Japanese as well.

Russian tends to be useless as almost all educated Russians are fluent in English.

Civil law countries: French/English for France. Lots of opportunities for McGill law graduates.

Thanks!!

OP here. Thanks everyone!

I spent the first few years of my life in Taiwan, so my Mandarin is near-flawless. However, my reading/writing skills... I actually had an internship w/a large law firm in China this summer, so I know that my Chinese is good enough for inter-office communication and reading docs w/Google Translate.

Guess I'll be bidding and mass mailing all the US/UK firms in Chinese-speaking countries. I would prefer a US job next summer, but looks like my grades will force me to search farther out.

I was born in the U.S. but attended Chinese school from k-12. I can speak Chinese more or less fluently. Reading and writing requires heavy reliance on a dictionary.

On my resume, I listed "Mandarin - Fluent." On my first day of SA at V10 last year, I wasasked by a partner to translate an antitrust document on the spot. Could not do it. Later, I was handed a 100 page long, highly technical document and told to look for and translate portions that discussed a specific manufacturing process. That I did do, but it took much, much longer than they expected. I was paranoid the whole summer about getting no-offered for misrepresenting myself on my resume.

Got an offer, but lesson learned is do NOT put "fluent" unless you are fluent in speaking, reading, and writing. My resume now says "Fluent in Speaking."

The level below "fluent" is "proficient".

Anonymous User wrote:I was born in the U.S. but attended Chinese school from k-12. I can speak Chinese more or less fluently. Reading and writing requires heavy reliance on a dictionary.

On my resume, I listed "Mandarin - Fluent." On my first day of SA at V10 last year, I wasasked by a partner to translate an antitrust document on the spot. Could not do it. Later, I was handed a 100 page long, highly technical document and told to look for and translate portions that discussed a specific manufacturing process. That I did do, but it took much, much longer than they expected. I was paranoid the whole summer about getting no-offered for misrepresenting myself on my resume.

Got an offer, but lesson learned is do NOT put "fluent" unless you are fluent in speaking, reading, and writing. My resume now says "Fluent in Speaking."

Crap. Lesson learned then. I'll make a note of that for my resumes.