orrick for patent litigation Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428548
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
orrick for patent litigation
is orrick regarded a good firm for patent litigation on the west coast?
-
- Posts: 10751
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: orrick for patent litigation
Band 2 in Chambers.Anonymous User wrote:is orrick regarded a good firm for patent litigation on the west coast?
Interested in personal opinions.
-
- Posts: 428548
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: orrick for patent litigation
I work at one of the big SF patent litigation firms and don't often hear their name in the mix. The ones I do hear are Quinn, MoFo, Keker, Kirkland. They certainly aren't on the top of the heap like these guys, but maybe they're relevant - not sure.
-
- Posts: 428548
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: orrick for patent litigation
Kirkland is big in SF?Anonymous User wrote:I work at one of the big SF patent litigation firms and don't often hear their name in the mix. The ones I do hear are Quinn, MoFo, Keker, Kirkland. They certainly aren't on the top of the heap like these guys, but maybe they're relevant - not sure.
- gotmilk?
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:25 am
Re: orrick for patent litigation
They have a few solid patent lit partners- Neel Chatterjee stands out and is extremely well-respected. Orrick's practice is quite large, though, so they also get a lot of run-of-the-mill troll work (especially with their alternate pricing that they often do now). It depends on who you work for. Their trade secrets practice is top-notch and better than nearly all other SV firms.
-
- Posts: 428548
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: orrick for patent litigation
yeah, they've been getting a lot of press recently for major wins in the patent litigation cases that everybody hears about.Anonymous User wrote:Kirkland is big in SF?Anonymous User wrote:I work at one of the big SF patent litigation firms and don't often hear their name in the mix. The ones I do hear are Quinn, MoFo, Keker, Kirkland. They certainly aren't on the top of the heap like these guys, but maybe they're relevant - not sure.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login