--LinkRemoved--
Does anyone know if these "minimum qualifications" are enforced? I have an interview with a US Magistrate Judge, but I am outside the "top 33%" of my class and no law review. I noticed there's a catchall provision where the judge can say you've "demonstrated proficiency in legal studies" equivalent to high academic standing and/or law review. Any ideas on this?
Minimum Qualifications for Federal Law Clerks? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
augusta1985
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:15 pm
-
kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Minimum Qualifications for Federal Law Clerks?
The catchall phrase allows judges to do whatever the hell they want. If the mag judge likes you, then you're in.
-
Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Minimum Qualifications for Federal Law Clerks?
kalvano wrote:The catchall phrase allows judges to do whatever the hell they want. If the mag judge likes you, then you're in.
