Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
Thanks for the input everyone!
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:21 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
First. The statement above? It's not logically coherent. It's like saying: "I'm not sure what Houston airport I'm going to fly into, probably Love Field." Litigation is not a corporate practice area.I would be SA'ing in the corporate practice area (probably litigation).
Second. I'd probably pick BB. I'm not sure what they can do if you don't come back for a 2L summer, except maybe no offer you (but you don't care at that point, because you aren't coming back).
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
Go with Baker Botts. They have a great reputation, and if you don't transfer, then you've got a 2L job lined up.
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
I apologize for not being clearer. I'd be with the Corporate group (rather than, say, real estate or insurance), but probably working specifically in a practice like complex business litigation or securities litigation. Like I said, I have no idea what I'm doing, and I won't pretend like I do.Anonymous User wrote:First. The statement above? It's not logically coherent. It's like saying: "I'm not sure what Houston airport I'm going to fly into, probably Love Field." Litigation is not a corporate practice area.I would be SA'ing in the corporate practice area (probably litigation).
Second. I'd probably pick BB. I'm not sure what they can do if you don't come back for a 2L summer, except maybe no offer you (but you don't care at that point, because you aren't coming back).
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
Most firms don't divide things up this way. What is called the "corporate practice" is typically the corporate transactional practice; business and securities lit typically fall under the umbrella of the "litigation practice". Maybe they do things differently in Texas, but for most big firms, things aren't divided the way you're dividing them.Anonymous User wrote:I apologize for not being clearer. I'd be with the Corporate group (rather than, say, real estate or insurance), but probably working specifically in a practice like complex business litigation or securities litigation.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
Oh, interesting. I didn't realize. Thanks for the information. I'll be sure not to make that mistake in the future.vanwinkle wrote:Most firms don't divide things up this way. What is called the "corporate practice" is typically the corporate transactional practice; business and securities lit typically fall under the umbrella of the "litigation practice". Maybe they do things differently in Texas, but for most big firms, things aren't divided the way you're dividing them.Anonymous User wrote:I apologize for not being clearer. I'd be with the Corporate group (rather than, say, real estate or insurance), but probably working specifically in a practice like complex business litigation or securities litigation.
-
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:52 pm
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
why don't you give it your all at all 3 and then ask which one once you get offers.
callback ≠ offer
Weil will offer more flexibility, though, if you decide to transfer. Even if you don't, I think they have NY lockstep even in Texas, so that's definitely an upside.
callback ≠ offer
Weil will offer more flexibility, though, if you decide to transfer. Even if you don't, I think they have NY lockstep even in Texas, so that's definitely an upside.
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
hey there - i haven't heard back yet from Weil (did the callback in NY), and i'm wondering when you interviewed & received the offer.
Thanks
Thanks
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
Interviewed last week, haven't heard back yet, but I expect to hear from them this week (praying for an offer). I'll keep you posted.Anonymous User wrote:hey there - i haven't heard back yet from Weil (did the callback in NY), and i'm wondering when you interviewed & received the offer.
Thanks
One offer so far.
- Aberzombie1892
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
Definitely BB.
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
BB = Tex Big 3. If you end up staying in Texas, having this on your resume will serve you very well.
LL = Solid firm. Slightly smaller than the Big 3. Tends to have a more diverse array of clients, but tends not to work the big cases for the big business institutions in Texas (think: Energy companies).
Weil = NY firm. Smallish but respected presence in Texas. Especially strong in IP. Might help marginally if you end up going to the Northeast, but satellite offices tend to be more like, well, satellites, and not amoeba-like extensions of their home offices, so it might not give you a ton of cred.
LL = Solid firm. Slightly smaller than the Big 3. Tends to have a more diverse array of clients, but tends not to work the big cases for the big business institutions in Texas (think: Energy companies).
Weil = NY firm. Smallish but respected presence in Texas. Especially strong in IP. Might help marginally if you end up going to the Northeast, but satellite offices tend to be more like, well, satellites, and not amoeba-like extensions of their home offices, so it might not give you a ton of cred.
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
This is a side issue: Trying to transfer to a Chicago law school, UChi or NW. With my grades in the appropriate range, do you think having one over the others on my resume will make a difference for my application?Anonymous User wrote:BB = Tex Big 3. If you end up staying in Texas, having this on your resume will serve you very well.
LL = Solid firm. Slightly smaller than the Big 3. Tends to have a more diverse array of clients, but tends not to work the big cases for the big business institutions in Texas (think: Energy companies).
Weil = NY firm. Smallish but respected presence in Texas. Especially strong in IP. Might help marginally if you end up going to the Northeast, but satellite offices tend to be more like, well, satellites, and not amoeba-like extensions of their home offices, so it might not give you a ton of cred.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
Well, LL has a sizable (100+ atty) presence in Chicago. Weil has no Chi office. Neither does BB.Anonymous User wrote:This is a side issue: Trying to transfer to a Chicago law school, UChi or NW. With my grades in the appropriate range, do you think having one over the others on my resume will make a difference for my application?Anonymous User wrote:BB = Tex Big 3. If you end up staying in Texas, having this on your resume will serve you very well.
LL = Solid firm. Slightly smaller than the Big 3. Tends to have a more diverse array of clients, but tends not to work the big cases for the big business institutions in Texas (think: Energy companies).
Weil = NY firm. Smallish but respected presence in Texas. Especially strong in IP. Might help marginally if you end up going to the Northeast, but satellite offices tend to be more like, well, satellites, and not amoeba-like extensions of their home offices, so it might not give you a ton of cred.
That aside, I don't think it will make a huge difference either way. But you may want to go with LL & then try to transfer offices for 2L summer if you transfer schools.
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Texas Big Law: Baker Botts, Locke Lord, or Weil?
Much thanks & CongratsAnonymous User wrote:Interviewed last week, haven't heard back yet, but I expect to hear from them this week (praying for an offer). I'll keep you posted.Anonymous User wrote:hey there - i haven't heard back yet from Weil (did the callback in NY), and i'm wondering when you interviewed & received the offer.
Thanks
One offer so far.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login