Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
If anyone is interested:
Yale - 1
Harvard - 6
Chicago - 12
Michigan - 9
UVA - 2
Northwestern - 9
Cornell - 1
Vanderbilt - 1
WUSTL - 3
BU - 2
IU-B - 1
Notre Dame - 2
Illinois - 3
Chicago-Kent - 1
Total - 53
Yale - 1
Harvard - 6
Chicago - 12
Michigan - 9
UVA - 2
Northwestern - 9
Cornell - 1
Vanderbilt - 1
WUSTL - 3
BU - 2
IU-B - 1
Notre Dame - 2
Illinois - 3
Chicago-Kent - 1
Total - 53
- 5ky
- Posts: 10835
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:10 pm
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
This might make for a pretty decent megathread, where people could post for more firms than just Kirkland Chi. Might be a while before things started to get rolling, however.
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
That list's incorrect. There was (at least) one SLS student at Kirkland Chicago.
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
SLS isn't the only one missing. This list is BS.
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
OP HereAnonymous User wrote:That list's incorrect. There was (at least) one SLS student at Kirkland Chicago.
Your use of the past tense makes me think that you lack reading comprehension skills or, alternatively, attention to detail. This list is for this coming summer, the summer of 2012.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
uuuh the error comes from your ambiguity, not anyone else's RC fail. jackass.Anonymous User wrote:OP HereAnonymous User wrote:That list's incorrect. There was (at least) one SLS student at Kirkland Chicago.
Your use of the past tense makes me think that you lack reading comprehension skills. This list is for this coming summer, the summer of 2012.
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
Thread title is clearly, "Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School"IAFG wrote:uuuh the error comes from your ambiguity, not anyone else's RC fail. jackass.Anonymous User wrote:OP HereAnonymous User wrote:That list's incorrect. There was (at least) one SLS student at Kirkland Chicago.
Your use of the past tense makes me think that you lack reading comprehension skills. This list is for this coming summer, the summer of 2012.
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
Yea it's wrong. Not outing but there are schools not on that list.Anonymous User wrote:OP HereAnonymous User wrote:That list's incorrect. There was (at least) one SLS student at Kirkland Chicago.
Your use of the past tense makes me think that you lack reading comprehension skills or, alternatively, attention to detail. This list is for this coming summer, the summer of 2012.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
The year could just as easily refer to the year they're graduating as the year they're summering.Anonymous User wrote: Thread title is clearly, "Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School"
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
Why does everything on this forum have to turn into a pissing contest? Seriously, what THE F*CK is wrong with you people?
It's pretty easy to say "hey man, I think your stats might be off because of X reason"
*slaps head* f*cking law students
*waits for ad hom*
It's pretty easy to say "hey man, I think your stats might be off because of X reason"
*slaps head* f*cking law students
*waits for ad hom*
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
Listen guys - This is the info I received. If the list is incomplete, then they've made additional hires in the past week. Fuck me for trying to provide some data.
- California Babe
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:45 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
Not really. 2012 precedes the phrase "SA Class" and is, therefore, descriptive of that phrase. If it had said "2012 Class," maybe. But "2012 SA Class" clearly means the summer associate class in the year 2012. There is nothing ambiguous about that title.IAFG wrote:The year could just as easily refer to the year they're graduating as the year they're summering.Anonymous User wrote: Thread title is clearly, "Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School"
This also comports with the fact that firms refer to their programs during the year they happen, not the year students graduate.
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:13 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
Anonymous User wrote:Why does everything on this forum have to turn into a pissing contest? Seriously, what THE F*CK is wrong with you people?
It's pretty easy to say "hey man, I think your stats might be off because of X reason"
*slaps head* f*cking law students
*waits for ad hom*
Last edited by TheFriendlyBarber on Tue Nov 15, 2011 1:36 am, edited 2 times in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
Very interesting. I wonder if this data is going to look much different for the people who just got done with OCI.
- omninode
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:09 pm
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
Wow, this thread went off the rails in record time.
- Grizz
- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
One of my bro bros got a jerb at KE and I saw this listAnonymous User wrote:SLS isn't the only one missing. This list is BS.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 6:23 pm
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
I haven't posted in over a year but I feel really compelled to break that streak to tell you that you're wrong/stupid for finding that ambiguous. See you in 2012 for my next post when these Kirkland SAs are in the middle of their summers. "[Class of] 2012 SA Class?" C'mon.IAFG wrote:The year could just as easily refer to the year they're graduating as the year they're summering.Anonymous User wrote: Thread title is clearly, "Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School"
There are schools missing though.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
OP Here -
So it looks like there are schools missing from the list sent out. I apologize but I figured the #s were pretty much complete. Also - thanks California Babe.
So it looks like there are schools missing from the list sent out. I apologize but I figured the #s were pretty much complete. Also - thanks California Babe.
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
I hope that a lot of you are not like your internet persona in real life. Sadly, I suspect most are
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
MB has more Yalies
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
Hey does anyone know how accurate this list is?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:13 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
Reveal yourself!Anonymous User wrote:I hope that a lot of you are not like your internet persona in real life. Sadly, I suspect most are
Last edited by TheFriendlyBarber on Tue Nov 15, 2011 1:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
list looks accurate to me. are you sure something is missing or are you relying on the speculation of people in this thread?Anonymous User wrote:OP Here -
So it looks like there are schools missing from the list sent out. I apologize but I figured the #s were pretty much complete. Also - thanks California Babe.
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
OP here -Anonymous User wrote:list looks accurate to me. are you sure something is missing or are you relying on the speculation of people in this thread?Anonymous User wrote:OP Here -
So it looks like there are schools missing from the list sent out. I apologize but I figured the #s were pretty much complete. Also - thanks California Babe.
My OP was accurate and complete as far as I knew. It was based on a list that was sent out to Chicago SAs.
-
- Posts: 428558
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kirkland Chicago's 2012 SA Class by School
List is incomplete. There will be more than 53 this summer.
Also, there are always very few Yalies at K&E, for some reason. In Chicago, they seem to prefer Sidley and Mayer. In New York, they tend towards Davis Polk and Debevoise.
Also, there are always very few Yalies at K&E, for some reason. In Chicago, they seem to prefer Sidley and Mayer. In New York, they tend towards Davis Polk and Debevoise.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login