fish & richardson - white collar? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428548
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
fish & richardson - white collar?
So why in the world does FR have a white collar practice? Wasn't this a patent boutique. I just now found out about this. This seems very bizarre.
Is patent litigation drying up?
Is patent litigation drying up?
- erico
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:56 am
Re: fish & richardson - white collar?
yeah patent litigation is dead.
- quadsixm
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:52 pm
Re: fish & richardson - white collar?
lolerico wrote:yeah patent litigation is dead.
- Bosque
- Posts: 1672
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:14 pm
Re: fish & richardson - white collar?
I am pretty sure Fish gobbled up another firm that had the white colar practice, which would be where it came from.
And yes, patent litigation is dead. All of us IP lawyers should start filling out our Burger King applications.
And yes, patent litigation is dead. All of us IP lawyers should start filling out our Burger King applications.
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: fish & richardson - white collar?
I already locked down a position at Five Guys. You all better get on it or you'll be FUKT.Bosque wrote:I am pretty sure Fish gobbled up another firm that had the white colar practice, which would be where it came from.
And yes, patent litigation is dead. All of us IP lawyers should start filling out our Burger King applications.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: fish & richardson - white collar?
I recently did a CB at Shake Shack. It's more of a boutique, however, but becoming more prestigious.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:I already locked down a position at Five Guys. You all better get on it or you'll be FUKT.Bosque wrote:I am pretty sure Fish gobbled up another firm that had the white colar practice, which would be where it came from.
And yes, patent litigation is dead. All of us IP lawyers should start filling out our Burger King applications.
- englawyer
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm
Re: fish & richardson - white collar?
fish had the idea to become a GP firm. apparently it utterly failed and they are going back to focusing on IP
-
- Posts: 428548
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: fish & richardson - white collar?
IP --> trade secret litigation --> white collar if federal government gets involved.
so it is relevant in some IP cases.
so it is relevant in some IP cases.
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: fish & richardson - white collar?
There are also some criminal code sections tucked into statutes relating to copyright and ITC matters because of TRIPS.Anonymous User wrote:IP --> trade secret litigation --> white collar if federal government gets involved.
so it is relevant in some IP cases.
-
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:53 am
Re: fish & richardson - white collar?
Regarding the death of patent litigation:
I'm sure it will pick up with the America Invents Act. After a huge bill such as the AAA, someone is going to need lawyers to argue about what it means to see what they can get away with... but we won't be seeing the effects until it kicks into full swing.
I'm sure it will pick up with the America Invents Act. After a huge bill such as the AAA, someone is going to need lawyers to argue about what it means to see what they can get away with... but we won't be seeing the effects until it kicks into full swing.
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: fish & richardson - white collar?
::misses the joke::turbotong wrote:Regarding the death of patent litigation:
I'm sure it will pick up with the America Invents Act. After a huge bill such as the AAA, someone is going to need lawyers to argue about what it means to see what they can get away with... but we won't be seeing the effects until it kicks into full swing.
-
- Posts: 428548
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
- erico
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:56 am
Re: fish & richardson - white collar?
yeah. wow. i mean, really?Big Shrimpin wrote:::misses the joke::turbotong wrote:Regarding the death of patent litigation:
I'm sure it will pick up with the America Invents Act. After a huge bill such as the AAA, someone is going to need lawyers to argue about what it means to see what they can get away with... but we won't be seeing the effects until it kicks into full swing.
-
- Posts: 428548
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: fish & richardson - white collar?
must suck to be a white collar associate there thenenglawyer wrote:fish had the idea to become a GP firm. apparently it utterly failed and they are going back to focusing on IP
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login