Top Law Schools

Factor in QoL, living costs, associate satisfaction? Exclude tertiaries like Miami/Boston; consider simply SF/SV, LA, Chi, DC, NYC.

Is it chi?

ITT: personal preference

Grizz wrote:ITT: personal preference

Interesting because the metrics I listed are ... all objectively measured.

Anonymous User wrote:

Grizz wrote:ITT: personal preference

Interesting because the metrics I listed are ... all objectively measured.

Dude, wtf?

vanwinkle wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

Grizz wrote:ITT: personal preference

Interesting because the metrics I listed are ... all objectively measured.

Dude, wtf?

Cost of living/QoL -- lump them. Objective.

Associate satisfaction -- take midlevel associate satisfaction surveys from AmLaw and compare the regions.

This is not mensa-level activity.

Anonymous User wrote:

vanwinkle wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

Grizz wrote:ITT: personal preference

Interesting because the metrics I listed are ... all objectively measured.

Dude, wtf?

Cost of living/QoL -- lump them. Objective.

Associate satisfaction -- take midlevel associate satisfaction surveys from AmLaw and compare the regions.

This is not mensa-level activity.

Then do it yourself.

I put all of this in an excel spreadsheet and the output was #####. HTMFH

Need an Excel MFE/masterman to please look over my formulas.

Edit: This wasn't meant to be anonymous. MODS!

edit: fixt
edit: damn it mod, you fixed nothing.
that's really weird. it WAS fixt.

Anonymous User wrote:I put all of this in an excel spreadsheet and the output was Chicago. HTMFH

If you answered your own question, why do you need us.

You're not good at trolling.

So go out and snag one of the many jobs available in Chicago. I hear there are an abundance of legal jobs there for the pickin'

Anonymous User wrote:I put all of this in an excel spreadsheet and the output was #####. HTMFH

Need an Excel MFE/masterman to please look over my formulas.

Edit: This wasn't meant to be anonymous. MODS!

lol

Damn it, that was my post. I am not OP.

Transferthrowaway wrote:Damn it, that was my post. I am not OP.

You silly goose

Grizz wrote:

Transferthrowaway wrote:Damn it, that was my post. I am not OP.

You silly goose

I joke-failed after I excel-failed.

Grizz wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:Cost of living/QoL -- lump them. Objective.

Associate satisfaction -- take midlevel associate satisfaction surveys from AmLaw and compare the regions.

This is not mensa-level activity.

Then do it yourself.

This. If it's so easy to figure out, what's wrong with you that you need others to do it?

If you think quality of life is objective, then you don't know what objective means.

Geist13 wrote:If you think quality of life is objective, then you don't know what objective means.

Or, for that matter, quality of life.

Renzo wrote:

Geist13 wrote:If you think quality of life is objective, then you don't know what objective means.

Or, for that matter, quality of life.

Or of.

tlstlstls73 wrote:

Renzo wrote:

Geist13 wrote:If you think quality of life is objective, then you don't know what objective means.

Or, for that matter, quality of life.

Or of.

Or "."

In terms of how far "market" pay will take you, Texas > Chicago > DC > LA > market pay at pretty much every other city in the US > NYC.

In terms of everything else you might be alluding to, discussion would be pretty much pointless (as you've seen ITT thus far). Just pick a place you want to live.

...

duckmoney wrote:In terms of how far "market" pay will take you, Texas > Chicago > DC > LA > market pay at pretty much every other city in the US > NYC.

In terms of everything else you might be alluding to, discussion would be pretty much pointless (as you've seen ITT thus far). Just pick a place you want to live.

I agree with this. The objective measures (cost of living and whatnot) will mean very little if you are not happy with your location.

omninode wrote:

duckmoney wrote:In terms of how far "market" pay will take you, Texas > Chicago > DC > LA > market pay at pretty much every other city in the US > NYC.

In terms of everything else you might be alluding to, discussion would be pretty much pointless (as you've seen ITT thus far). Just pick a place you want to live.

I agree with this. The objective measures (cost of living and whatnot) will mean very little if you are not happy with your location.

In fact, if you believe in free markets even a little bit, then there's a good case that high cost of living is irrelevant. It's just the market price for living someplace better. If San Francisco is twice as expensive as Kearny, NE, then the average resident must think it's twice as good, because otherwise people would move and prices would come down until people felt like they were getting their money's worth.

Renzo wrote:

omninode wrote:

duckmoney wrote:In terms of how far "market" pay will take you, Texas > Chicago > DC > LA > market pay at pretty much every other city in the US > NYC.

In terms of everything else you might be alluding to, discussion would be pretty much pointless (as you've seen ITT thus far). Just pick a place you want to live.

I agree with this. The objective measures (cost of living and whatnot) will mean very little if you are not happy with your location.

In fact, if you believe in free markets even a little bit, then there's a good case that high cost of living is irrelevant. It's just the market price for living someplace better. If San Francisco is twice as expensive as Kearny, NE, then the average resident must think it's twice as good, because otherwise people would move and prices would come down until people felt like they were getting their money's worth.

lulz. Joking, right?

I hear market $ goes pretty far in Chad nowadays.