Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Ice miller was brutal this year.....
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Schiff Hardin Chicago reportedly no-offers regularly. Think I heard 3/8 got no-offered this year.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
how many people got no offered this year?Anonymous User wrote:MUNGER
Stay away.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Debevoise NYC no offered 1 person.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
I'm not sure how helpful this thread actually is in rooting out firms that have problematic offer policies. I mean, for firms that have no-offered a significant portion of their class for the past few years, then yes, this thread is likely to be very helpful. But for firms that have no-offered 1 or 2 people and they have a rather large class, I feel like this thread probably causes more fear than helps.
I summered at a firm my 1L summer and was absolutely appalled by some of the antics of a few of my fellow 2L summer associates (I'm talking not coming into work numerous times, pawning off assignments on other summers, drinking an excessive amount a firm events - i.e. taking shots in the presence of numerous partners). Unsurprisingly, those 2Ls did not get offers to return to the firm. Just looking at the firm statistics, however, would show that the firm only offered 8/10 summers. Thus, even though the firm originally hired a summer class with the intention of giving everyone offers at the end of the summer, their offer rate was only 80% because some summers genuinely f***ed up and didn't "earn" an offer.
I think TLS users underestimate how unprofessional other law students can be while working at a law firm over the summer. So a firm that has only no-offered 1 or 2 people is probably a fine choice (unless you've spoken with ppl who summered at the firm and come to the conclusion that the no-offers were totally unwarranted).
I summered at a firm my 1L summer and was absolutely appalled by some of the antics of a few of my fellow 2L summer associates (I'm talking not coming into work numerous times, pawning off assignments on other summers, drinking an excessive amount a firm events - i.e. taking shots in the presence of numerous partners). Unsurprisingly, those 2Ls did not get offers to return to the firm. Just looking at the firm statistics, however, would show that the firm only offered 8/10 summers. Thus, even though the firm originally hired a summer class with the intention of giving everyone offers at the end of the summer, their offer rate was only 80% because some summers genuinely f***ed up and didn't "earn" an offer.
I think TLS users underestimate how unprofessional other law students can be while working at a law firm over the summer. So a firm that has only no-offered 1 or 2 people is probably a fine choice (unless you've spoken with ppl who summered at the firm and come to the conclusion that the no-offers were totally unwarranted).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
I think it is true in some cases but for the most case if there were 6 summer associates and only 3 or 2 of them got offered back the chances of 1/2 of the SA being that unprofessional is pretty damn low.Anonymous User wrote:I'm not sure how helpful this thread actually is in rooting out firms that have problematic offer policies. I mean, for firms that have no-offered a significant portion of their class for the past few years, then yes, this thread is likely to be very helpful. But for firms that have no-offered 1 or 2 people and they have a rather large class, I feel like this thread probably causes more fear than helps.
I summered at a firm my 1L summer and was absolutely appalled by some of the antics of a few of my fellow 2L summer associates (I'm talking not coming into work numerous times, pawning off assignments on other summers, drinking an excessive amount a firm events - i.e. taking shots in the presence of numerous partners). Unsurprisingly, those 2Ls did not get offers to return to the firm. Just looking at the firm statistics, however, would show that the firm only offered 8/10 summers. Thus, even though the firm originally hired a summer class with the intention of giving everyone offers at the end of the summer, their offer rate was only 80% because some summers genuinely f***ed up and didn't "earn" an offer.
I think TLS users underestimate how unprofessional other law students can be while working at a law firm over the summer. So a firm that has only no-offered 1 or 2 people is probably a fine choice (unless you've spoken with ppl who summered at the firm and come to the conclusion that the no-offers were totally unwarranted).
I think we should start mentioning firms who no offered more than 10-20% of the class. Not just every firm who no offered one person.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
And last year they offered 50 out of 52 in NYC, so safe to assume that Debevoise gives offers to everyone who doesn't act like an idiot? Any idea of if they do cold offers?f7u12 wrote:TBF, I heard that he earned it.Anonymous User wrote:Debevoise NYC no offered 1 person.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
It's not that bad. Two people no-offered last year (a third withdrew from consideration), and two of twenty-five-ish no-offered this year.Anonymous User wrote:how many people got no offered this year?Anonymous User wrote:MUNGER
Stay away.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 7:53 pm
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Any information as to why? Bad summers? Or did they plan to only hire 1/2?Anonymous User wrote:Ice miller was brutal this year.....
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
I believe Dickstein Shapiro NY no-offered/rescinded more than half in both 2009 and 2010. Don't know about 2011.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
There is one measurable advantage to firms that give at least a cold offer to everyone (DPW, Cleary), which is that:
1) Sometimes those 1-2 people genuinely acted like idiots. Other times, some powerful partner took an intense disliking to them for nothing more than being as clueless as every other summer associate.
2) Come 3L OCI, you want that cold offer to point to, even if it's a dirty, dirty lie.
1) Sometimes those 1-2 people genuinely acted like idiots. Other times, some powerful partner took an intense disliking to them for nothing more than being as clueless as every other summer associate.
2) Come 3L OCI, you want that cold offer to point to, even if it's a dirty, dirty lie.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Not to sound naive, but what on earth would possess a person to skip work, shirk assignments and take shots at firm events?! I just... what?!
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
what about the NYC market? do those firms generally give all offers
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Do any firms even cold offer anymore. ITE, you'd get people taking the offers.Anonymous User wrote:There is one measurable advantage to firms that give at least a cold offer to everyone (DPW, Cleary), which is that:
1) Sometimes those 1-2 people genuinely acted like idiots. Other times, some powerful partner took an intense disliking to them for nothing more than being as clueless as every other summer associate.
2) Come 3L OCI, you want that cold offer to point to, even if it's a dirty, dirty lie.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
+1, although I've heard some of it was the personalities of the people who were no-offered.Anonymous User wrote:Ice miller was brutal this year.....
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
I think this thread could be helpful, but hearing "Giant firm X no-offered 1 person" is really unhelpful.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Anonymous User wrote:+1, although I've heard some of it was the personalities of the people who were no-offered.Anonymous User wrote:Ice miller was brutal this year.....
any idea of actual number of no-offers?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Heard 3 of 7. That could be wrong, but I heard that from a few people. I know it was somewhere in the neighborhood of 2-3 out of 7ish. I did my HW cause it was a firm I was considering.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:+1, although I've heard some of it was the personalities of the people who were no-offered.Anonymous User wrote:Ice miller was brutal this year.....
any idea of actual number of no-offers?
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Can someone back up the cold-offers mentioned above at DPW and Cleary??? Did this happen last year or in years past as well?
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
I meant DPW and Cleary are known to give cold offers, not that they did last year. At these firms it's simply assumed on day 1 that everyone will get an offer. The cold offer horror stories are along the lines of "X stopped showing up to work, she was asked not to accept her offer."Anonymous User wrote:Can someone back up the cold-offers mentioned above at DPW and Cleary??? Did this happen last year or in years past as well?
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Was even worse for M&M in Nashville.Anonymous User wrote:For ATL peeps, I know Miller & Martin no-offered 1 of the three SAs (the only 2L)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Seriously. If I were given a cold offer, I would accept it if I couldn't get any other offers. I doubt the firm would want to end up on ATL for revoking a permanent offer.Desert Fox wrote:Do any firms even cold offer anymore. ITE, you'd get people taking the offers.Anonymous User wrote:There is one measurable advantage to firms that give at least a cold offer to everyone (DPW, Cleary), which is that:
1) Sometimes those 1-2 people genuinely acted like idiots. Other times, some powerful partner took an intense disliking to them for nothing more than being as clueless as every other summer associate.
2) Come 3L OCI, you want that cold offer to point to, even if it's a dirty, dirty lie.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Gotcha. I am summering at one of these firms so I literally had a heart attack when I read that initially. Thanks!Anonymous User wrote:I meant DPW and Cleary are known to give cold offers, not that they did last year. At these firms it's simply assumed on day 1 that everyone will get an offer. The cold offer horror stories are along the lines of "X stopped showing up to work, she was asked not to accept her offer."Anonymous User wrote:Can someone back up the cold-offers mentioned above at DPW and Cleary??? Did this happen last year or in years past as well?
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
Even ITE I suspect someone who can get Cleary can pull off a 3L offer.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Name firms who no-offered 2011 SA's
For the record, every incident of cold-offering I heard of at one of the above firms that I worked at happened years ago and was for extremely egregious conduct. Turns out sexually harassing people is a great way to not be welcomed back to the firm with open arms. Who knew?Anonymous User wrote:Gotcha. I am summering at one of these firms so I literally had a heart attack when I read that initially. Thanks!Anonymous User wrote:I meant DPW and Cleary are known to give cold offers, not that they did last year. At these firms it's simply assumed on day 1 that everyone will get an offer. The cold offer horror stories are along the lines of "X stopped showing up to work, she was asked not to accept her offer."Anonymous User wrote:Can someone back up the cold-offers mentioned above at DPW and Cleary??? Did this happen last year or in years past as well?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login