Page 1 of 1

Proskauer v. Sheppard

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:43 pm
by Anonymous User
Simple vote. Both CA offices. Primarily interested in Litigation.

Re: Proskauer v. Sheppard

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 9:07 pm
by YourCaptain
If LA offices; SM for Lit, Proskauer for Corp

Congrats!

Re: Proskauer v. Sheppard

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 10:23 pm
by Anonymous User
I personally liked Proskauer better and loved the people I met in their lit department.

Re: Proskauer v. Sheppard

Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 11:10 pm
by Anonymous User
bump

Re: Proskauer v. Sheppard

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 12:13 am
by Anonymous User
.

Re: Proskauer v. Sheppard

Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:14 am
by Anonymous User
reasons?

Re: Proskauer v. Sheppard

Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 1:11 am
by Anonymous User
bumpity bump bump

Re: Proskauer v. Sheppard

Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 2:08 am
by Anonymous User
Sheppard mullin because it pays lockstep, yet the hourly requirement (1950) is a genuine one. You can meet it and no one will bother you.

Also, Sheppard is doing great lately in terms of profitability, and reports are that it has no long term debt to speak of. At this point it is attracting, not losing partners, and climbed ten spots on the v100 rankings last year.

Finally, Sheppard because it has one of the best summer programs in the country, and is known for putting a lot into young associate development.

Re: Proskauer v. Sheppard

Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 11:22 am
by Anonymous User
Anonymous User wrote:Sheppard mullin because it pays lockstep, yet the hourly requirement (1950) is a genuine one. You can meet it and no one will bother you.

Also, Sheppard is doing great lately in terms of profitability, and reports are that it has no long term debt to speak of. At this point it is attracting, not losing partners, and climbed ten spots on the v100 rankings last year.

Finally, Sheppard because it has one of the best summer programs in the country, and is known for putting a lot into young associate development.
It's lockstep only for partnership track employees, right? <edit> (i.e., not lockstep) <edit> I heard you need ~2100. The partners in the practice group I interviewed with were really cool. The firm has brand name appeal in CA (even if the boys on Wallstreet haven't heard of it). Excited for May (but not LA).