Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 2:07 am
What are the big distinctions between these three? For litigation, is it true that in Boston R&G>WH>GP, or is it more granular than this? What are the exit options like from each? Is there a significant difference in reputation outside of New England among them? Particularly interested in how Goodwin will play elsewhere, as Ropes seems pretty established nationally and Wilmer is really buoyed by the DC office.