Page 1 of 1

Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 2:07 am
by Anonymous User
What are the big distinctions between these three? For litigation, is it true that in Boston R&G>WH>GP, or is it more granular than this? What are the exit options like from each? Is there a significant difference in reputation outside of New England among them? Particularly interested in how Goodwin will play elsewhere, as Ropes seems pretty established nationally and Wilmer is really buoyed by the DC office.

Re: Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 8:49 am
by englawyer
at least for IP litigation, WH > R&G.

Re: Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:03 am
by Anonymous User
I am interested in this as well. I would like some thoughts on cultural differences between the three.

Re: Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:54 am
by monkey85
tag.

interested.