Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  
Anonymous User
Posts: 428403
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Sep 03, 2011 2:07 am

What are the big distinctions between these three? For litigation, is it true that in Boston R&G>WH>GP, or is it more granular than this? What are the exit options like from each? Is there a significant difference in reputation outside of New England among them? Particularly interested in how Goodwin will play elsewhere, as Ropes seems pretty established nationally and Wilmer is really buoyed by the DC office.
Top
User avatar
englawyer

Silver
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm

Re: Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

Post by englawyer » Sat Sep 03, 2011 8:49 am

at least for IP litigation, WH > R&G.
Top
Anonymous User
Posts: 428403
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:03 am

I am interested in this as well. I would like some thoughts on cultural differences between the three.
Top
User avatar
monkey85

Bronze
Posts: 394
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:07 pm

Re: Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

Post by monkey85 » Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:54 am

tag.

interested.
Top

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!

Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”