CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:50 pm
...total SA spots.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=163214
IAFG wrote:...total SA spots.
Truth.rayiner wrote:Mayer Chicago just gives up hiring anybody, looking to fill first-year spots on the lateral market.
Not sure if srs.BackToTheOldHouse wrote:Is this good or bad? Context, if you will.
Back when we still had an economy, "NYC to $190k" was a meme. I am poking fun at the lack of Chicago recovery.BackToTheOldHouse wrote:Is this good or bad? Context, if you will.
Ahh, I get it. I was serious in that I have never paid any attention to the SA class size in Chicago.IAFG wrote:Back when we still had an economy, "NYC to $190k" was a meme. I am poking fun at the lack of Chicago recovery.BackToTheOldHouse wrote:Is this good or bad? Context, if you will.
Kirkland is not sure if serious.Anonymous User wrote:Truth.rayiner wrote:Mayer Chicago just gives up hiring anybody, looking to fill first-year spots on the lateral market.
I would avoid Mayer. It has been in steady decline since Refco. Same goes for Jenner. Chicago-based firms are pretty TTT.
ETA: Mayer actually makes their SAs work too. Most of them worked like 8-8 this summer from what I hear. The horror.
The can threaten to leave, but taxes here are still low compared to other US financial centers.shoeshine wrote:I am skeptical that Chicago and Illinois in general will be able to recover as fast as the other markets.
Illinois decided to increase corporate and personal taxes in order to deal with its latest budget deficit:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/13/us/13illinois.html.
This move has definitely angered large businesses. Some major businesses including Caterpillar and CME group have been threatening to leave the state. http://www.wbez.org/story/business-grou ... axes-89358
Why would a national law firm hire more associates in a place that has recently become unfriendly to its biggest customers, large corporations?
ToTransferOrNot wrote:Kirkland is not sure if serious.Anonymous User wrote:Truth.rayiner wrote:Mayer Chicago just gives up hiring anybody, looking to fill first-year spots on the lateral market.
I would avoid Mayer. It has been in steady decline since Refco. Same goes for Jenner. Chicago-based firms are pretty TTT.
ETA: Mayer actually makes their SAs work too. Most of them worked like 8-8 this summer from what I hear. The horror.
Kirkland is pwning, but is being helped along by its Chicago competitors completely shitting the bed.ToTransferOrNot wrote:Kirkland is not sure if serious.Anonymous User wrote:Truth.rayiner wrote:Mayer Chicago just gives up hiring anybody, looking to fill first-year spots on the lateral market.
I would avoid Mayer. It has been in steady decline since Refco. Same goes for Jenner. Chicago-based firms are pretty TTT.
ETA: Mayer actually makes their SAs work too. Most of them worked like 8-8 this summer from what I hear. The horror.
rayiner wrote:
Kirkland is pwning, but is being helped along by its Chicago competitors completely shitting the bed.