I am trying to understand the Chambers and Partners website. When I look at practice areas, it breaks them down into "elite" and then "highly regarded." What is the difference? Should a tier 4 elite be better than a tier 1 highly regarded? I am confused as to what the differences are.
Thanks!
Chambers and Partners Ranking Question Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
alumniguy
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 3:24 pm
Re: Chambers and Partners Ranking Question
Yes, any "elite" ranking is better than any "highly regarded." For what it is worth, not all practice ares have the "elite" rankings - it is basically reserved for headline type work, e.g., M&ASprangTyme wrote:I am trying to understand the Chambers and Partners website. When I look at practice areas, it breaks them down into "elite" and then "highly regarded." What is the difference? Should a tier 4 elite be better than a tier 1 highly regarded? I am confused as to what the differences are.
Thanks!
