.
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:43 pm
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=154516
^ Bolded isn't just the standard thing - it is the model for biglaw hiring. So, if you want to work for a big law firm, which you stated in your first line, then you really should get an SA position.Anonymous User wrote:Think my long-term goal is to get into politics, but my plan is very much to go to a firm for a few years after graduation - first, to help pay off loans, and second, to see if I happen to like the private sector better.
So, with the 2012 campaigns coming up, my question is whether it would be crazy to take a semester off to try and get a substantial campaign job (class of 2013 at a CCN here). Mainly, the questions are whether it would be possible to siphon off the missed semester's classes into other semesters (in terms of workload), and whether not working for a firm during my 2L summer would be fatal (provided I was at a campaign for either a presidential or senatorial candidate) even if I graduated on time. I guess a related question would be whether graduating late (Class of 2014) instead of trying to fit six semesters into five would have any other benefits/costs besides the obvious "standing out in a bad way."
My instinct is that it's not workable, but if anyone has actual experience out there, I'd love to hear more about it. For the haters, yeah I already know that the standard thing is to just find an SA position, so save your sarcastic responses for the kids in the admissions forum.
Try not being a complete jerk when you ask for help.Anonymous User wrote:OP here. Wow, thanks for letting me know that a law school would know its own administrative policy. Question was obviously more about whether it's something a person can handle personally and academically.
Also, some people realize that there are (substantial) risks inherent to every choice and affirmatively seek help in navigating those risks. Your response: "There's a risk! If you take it, you'll be taking a risk!"....not helpful dude. And don't take this as someone not being grateful for your wisdom, take it as someone pointing out that you're not super wise.
If anyone has actual experience working for campaigns during law school - whether by taking time off, taking on a credited internship during the fall semester, etc., I'm really eager to hear about your experience. Maybe just go back to bed if you don't have any experience outside of taking the standard track to a firm.
OP here. Wow, thanks for letting me know that a law school would know its own administrative policy. Question was obviously more about whether it's something a person can handle personally and academically.
Also, some people realize that there are (substantial) risks inherent to every choice and affirmatively seek help in navigating those risks. Your response: "There's a risk! If you take it, you'll be taking a risk!"....not helpful dude. And don't take this as someone not being grateful for your wisdom, take it as someone pointing out that you're not super wise.
If anyone has actual experience working for campaigns during law school - whether by taking time off, taking on a credited internship during the fall semester, etc., I'm really eager to hear about your experience. Maybe just go back to bed if you don't have any experience outside of taking the standard track to a firm.
don't bother campaigning - trump isn't going to win, anywayAnonymous User wrote:OP. 2LLLL - those are really good points. Thanks for the great advice, definitely going to keep in mind.
vamedic...anonymous because being somehow tracked back as a person who's going to bail on biglaw 3 years into it wouldn't be fun, however unlikely the scenario might be. also, there's a difference between being a "jerk" and not being enamored of the kid who's (metaphor alert) always raising his/her hand in class to triumphantly make the exact point that was made in a casebook note. i was pretty earnest in asking for help, and you gave a relatively insulting response. read over what you said originally and ask whether there's any way a 1L at a top school wouldn't have already known what you were posting.
Oh. So your anonymous because you asked a stupid question to which you already know the answer?Anonymous User wrote: read over what you said originally and ask whether there's any way a 1L at a top school wouldn't have already known what you were posting.
(1) I hate to tell you this, but big law is centered around the "person who's going to bail on 3 years." And, it's not as though you're discussing any specifics about firms or any particular information such as GPA that needs absolute anonymity.Anonymous User wrote:OP. 2LLLL - those are really good points. Thanks for the great advice, definitely going to keep in mind.
vamedic...anonymous because being somehow tracked back as a person who's going to bail on biglaw 3 years into it wouldn't be fun, however unlikely the scenario might be. also, there's a difference between being a "jerk" and not being enamored of the kid who's (metaphor alert) always raising his/her hand in class to triumphantly make the exact point that was made in a casebook note. i was pretty earnest in asking for help, and you gave a relatively insulting response. read over what you said originally and ask whether there's any way a 1L at a top school wouldn't have already known what you were posting.
The paradoxical thing about biglaw is that partners want associates who intend to stay for the long-haul, despite the fact most associates will leave/be pushed out in the 8 or so years to partnership. In other words, coming off as a "tourist" (as Evan Chesler calls it) is detrimental to your chances of getting a summer associate position. So his point is somewhat valid, if tainted by the fact that it's unlikely a firm will trace it back to him.I hate to tell you this, but big law is centered around the "person who's going to bail on 3 years.
This is because the current partners want new hires to work themselves to death before they leave, and one way to get them to do so is to convince them that they want to be a partner themselves someday. Someone who (realistically) treats the job like it will only last a few years isn't going to earn for the partners the way a deluded partnership-gunner will.Stanislaw Carter wrote:The paradoxical thing about biglaw is that partners want associates who intend to stay for the long-haul, despite the fact most associates will leave/be pushed out in the 8 or so years to partnership. In other words, coming off as a "tourist" (as Evan Chesler calls it) is detrimental to your chances of getting a summer associate position. So his point is somewhat valid, if tainted by the fact that it's unlikely a firm will trace it back to him.I hate to tell you this, but big law is centered around the "person who's going to bail on 3 years.
That's what I was trying to tell OP - you can do a normal BigLaw 2L SA and have a regular class schedule and still do campaign work (at least that's what my friend did. I have zero interest in politics).rayiner wrote:Not doing a 2L SA will be fatal. A few firms picked up 3Ls last year to make up for under-hiring at OCI 2011, but we're talking just a handful of people, and most were a SullCrom which was picking up folks looking to trade-up after their 2L SA.
1) This is not what the anon feature is for. It's for people who need to disclose/discuss sensitive information without linking their knowledge to their existing TLS identity, which may make them identifiable to the source of the information. "Hey I want to work in politics" is not at all sensitive, it's just broad general discussion common to a lot of law students.JetSetter68 wrote:OP. First of all, I'm using the anon feature for what everyone else uses it for - keeping any possible info that would make it harder to get a job from potential employers.
He's already in LS right now. (Class of '13 according to OP)tome wrote:Why not defer for a year, and do your 2L summer after your deferred year?