Dilworth Paxon
Posted: Sun Apr 03, 2011 5:05 pm
so...whats the reputation of this firm? its a "large" firm, not big enough for biglaw (IMO)...I'd like to know what people say about this firm rather than what their website says..
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=152337
Well, all I know is from looking at NALP, but in case you haven't see it:Anonymous User wrote:so...whats the reputation of this firm? its a "large" firm, not big enough for biglaw (IMO)...I'd like to know what people say about this firm rather than what their website says..
Hmm. thanks. When I visited the firm to do a CB interview the Philly office was medium sized. The lawyers there were telling me they get alot of hands on experience compared to other firms that pay 6 figures in Philly. Do you think that's something helpful for a young associate?Sup Kid wrote:Well, all I know is from looking at NALP, but in case you haven't see it:Anonymous User wrote:so...whats the reputation of this firm? its a "large" firm, not big enough for biglaw (IMO)...I'd like to know what people say about this firm rather than what their website says..
- They pay under-market for Philly ($110k vs. $125-130k).
- They only gave offers to 1/3 of their SAs in 2009 (which admittedly was a bad year, but that's still on the very low side).
- They have a minimum billable hour requirement of 2000 hours, which is higher than the average Philly firm (for example, Fox Rothschild's is 1850-1900, depending on practice area).
In sum, probably a fine firm if you want to be in Philly and/or make six figures and don't have many other options, but certainly not a great firm, at least by the numbers.
Well, they have more partners than associates, which is definitely not the norm, so I can believe that associates get a lot of experience early on vs. doing all doc review. However, unless you really love the feel of the firm, I would say go to wherever you are offered the most money. Remember, the average "lifespan" of a lawyer at their first firm is 4-6 years -- going to a more well-known firm will give you better exit options. Also, even if the 1st year salary is only $20k difference, remember that firms that start off paying below market tend to give less in salary raises and bonuses, so over five years it can really add up to a lot.Anonymous User wrote:Hmm. thanks. When I visited the firm to do a CB interview the Philly office was medium sized. The lawyers there were telling me they get alot of hands on experience compared to other firms that pay 6 figures in Philly. Do you think that's something helpful for a young associate?Sup Kid wrote:Well, all I know is from looking at NALP, but in case you haven't see it:Anonymous User wrote:so...whats the reputation of this firm? its a "large" firm, not big enough for biglaw (IMO)...I'd like to know what people say about this firm rather than what their website says..
- They pay under-market for Philly ($110k vs. $125-130k).
- They only gave offers to 1/3 of their SAs in 2009 (which admittedly was a bad year, but that's still on the very low side).
- They have a minimum billable hour requirement of 2000 hours, which is higher than the average Philly firm (for example, Fox Rothschild's is 1850-1900, depending on practice area).
In sum, probably a fine firm if you want to be in Philly and/or make six figures and don't have many other options, but certainly not a great firm, at least by the numbers.