Off-Plan Judges
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:19 am
Anyone have an updated list?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=147782
Anonymous User wrote:COA judges who have been known to hire off plan (probably an incomplete list):
2d Cir: Cabranes
3d Cir: Ambro, Fisher, Van Antwerpen
4th Cir. King, Niemeyer, Shedd, Wilkinson, Williams
5th Cir: Davis, Barksdale, Benavides, Smith, Southwick, Garwood, Wiener (rumored)
6th Cir: Merritt, Batchelder (rumored)
7th Cir: Posner
9th Cir: Ikuta, Kozinski, Reinhardt, Tallman
10th Cir: Lucero, Gorsuch, Henry, Kelly, Tymkovich, Baldock, Ebel
11th Cir: Dubina, Pryor, Cox, Tjoflat, Carnes
The judges that don't use the system the law schools agree too for when and how to apply for clerkships. Sometimes they hire outright before the time to apply starts or set it up to where they know who they are going to hire in advance, so by the time the plan starts they don't care about applications..bbermud wrote:Anonymous User wrote:COA judges who have been known to hire off plan (probably an incomplete list):
2d Cir: Cabranes
3d Cir: Ambro, Fisher, Van Antwerpen
4th Cir. King, Niemeyer, Shedd, Wilkinson, Williams
5th Cir: Davis, Barksdale, Benavides, Smith, Southwick, Garwood, Wiener (rumored)
6th Cir: Merritt, Batchelder (rumored)
7th Cir: Posner
9th Cir: Ikuta, Kozinski, Reinhardt, Tallman
10th Cir: Lucero, Gorsuch, Henry, Kelly, Tymkovich, Baldock, Ebel
11th Cir: Dubina, Pryor, Cox, Tjoflat, Carnes
what does off-plan mean?
Outside of the 10th Cir, where even the district courts have bailed on the plan.G. T. L. Rev. wrote:I think this is right. There are some exceptions, but at the COA level the norm now seems to be off-plan rather than on. District court hiring is different, and still seems to largely be on plan as far as I can tell.Gideon Strumpet wrote:Based on how the last cycle worked out, you'd get a lot shorter list if you just ask for the on-plan judges. The plan basically went out the window with the 2011 cycle; your baseline assumption now should be that everyone is off-plan, unless they say otherwise. (And even if they do say otherwise, you should probably still ask around; just hope you have good enough connections through professors and clerkship advisors who know the judges you want, to get someone who knows their actual plans).
G. T. L. Rev. wrote:To me, the greater risk is in waiting. I look at it this way: if you apply early to a judge, not knowing whether s/he moves on or off-plan, there is a strong chance that s/he moves off-plan. And, if s/he does not, there is still a strong chance that the judge will just leave your app in a pile somewhere, or toss it. Nothing lost there. There is only a small chance that the judge will be affirmatively put off by the untimely app and then ding you for it. I have only ever heard of this happening twice.iagolives wrote:Is it more risky, do we think, to send an app early to a judge that is committed to the plan or to wait for the plan deadline and risk missing a spot? (I feel like this was answered in the general clerkship thread but I couldn't find it.)
Also, won't be pretty funny in a sad way if these apocalypse people are, in fact, right and we spent our last days on earth worrying about applications? lol.
By contrast, if you wait to apply to a judge and the judge fills before the plan, you have a literally 0% shot at getting one of his/her clerkship slots. Given the number of judges moving on apps right now -- including many formerly on-plan judges -- and the number who will begin to move later this summer, simple math dictates that you would build up a lot of strikeouts before ever getting to the plate if you waited for September.
The best approach, IMO, is to build a list of the judges you want to apply to and then try to find out which ones follow the plan, assuming that all do not. You can learn what judges do by looking at their OSCAR page, which often, but not always indicates how the judge handles applications. Or, you could call the judges' chambers to ask anonymously. Or, if you have a question about a small number of circuit judges, you could ask me, or other 3Ls/grads you know (I would avoid sending anyone a long list and asking them to do the heavy investigating for you).
I would say the greater risk is in waiting. I know of some people who applied to judges who still hire on-plan (a handful even ignore the rush and hire well after the plan period, believe it or not). I did not hear about any judges taking offense at an early application. One person I know of called one chambers to ask if the judge would be interviewing in the summer, and the judge said no, but offered a short informational interview anyway. When they met, the judge just said up front, "So you know, I'm happy to talk with you, but this is not an interview."iagolives wrote:Is it more risky, do we think, to send an app early to a judge that is committed to the plan or to wait for the plan deadline and risk missing a spot?
Makes sense. Thanks.G. T. L. Rev. wrote:Varies by judge. Some are already done hiring, others are interviewing and looking at apps now, and still others will be doing so later this summer. Precisely when a judge starts to move is valuable information, which is why you won't readily find it online. Faculty, clerkship advisors, 3Ls, alumni, and people at your SA firm should be able to help you out.Green Crayons wrote:So when is the appropriate time frame to send in material to an off-plan judge?