Chicago Litigation Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:30 pm
Chicago Litigation
What's the best biglaw firm for general commercial litigation in Chicago? Kirkland? Mayer? Curious what the current word on the street is.
-
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:52 pm
Re: Chicago Litigation
.
Last edited by showNprove on Sat Feb 26, 2011 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428544
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Litigation
Kirkland & Ellis is the best, by far.
Best boutique is Bartlit Beck.
Best boutique is Bartlit Beck.
Is the implication supposed to be that Jenner >>> Kirkland?showNprove wrote:Jenner is the only firm in Chicago to be rated Chambers Band 1 for each of General Commercial Litigation, White-Collar Crime Litigation, and Media & Entertainment Litigation.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Chicago Litigation
Jenner is known for their litigation, but it's fading prestige.
Kirkland and Sidley are at the top of the heap, but Kirkland is on the upswing while Sidley is on the downswing.
Kirkland and Sidley are at the top of the heap, but Kirkland is on the upswing while Sidley is on the downswing.
-
- Posts: 428544
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Litigation
The Chicago Big 5 are the best general commercial litigation shops:
Kirkland, Sidley, Jenner, Winston, Mayer.
Kirkland is by far the best. I'm not quite sure why Jenner has the rep it has on this board and xoxo. It's good, but I'd certainly pick any of the other 4 over it.
Kirkland, Sidley, Jenner, Winston, Mayer.
Kirkland is by far the best. I'm not quite sure why Jenner has the rep it has on this board and xoxo. It's good, but I'd certainly pick any of the other 4 over it.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:30 pm
Re: Chicago Litigation
This is what I'd heard, too. For general commercial lit, I was thinking it went Kirkland --> Sidley/Mayer --> Jenner/Winston.rayiner wrote:Jenner is known for their litigation, but it's fading prestige.
Kirkland and Sidley are at the top of the heap, but Kirkland is on the upswing while Sidley is on the downswing.
- RVP11
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:32 pm
Re: Chicago Litigation
I wonder if Jenner's rep on here and xoxo is a product of the DC office's rep, not the Chicago office's.Anonymous User wrote:The Chicago Big 5 are the best general commercial litigation shops:
Kirkland, Sidley, Jenner, Winston, Mayer.
Kirkland is by far the best. I'm not quite sure why Jenner has the rep it has on this board and xoxo. It's good, but I'd certainly pick any of the other 4 over it.
-
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Chicago Litigation
FYI: Mayer is better than Kirkland for appellete lit, or at least it has been in the past, almost entirely on the shoulders of Steve Shapiro. I know that's not the question that was asked, but I figured I would point it out.
Bartlit is TCR, though, even though not biglaw (so, again, not really the question asked). They pay better than Kirkland (according a few people I know at Kirkland,) arguably do the same or better work, and do not deal with billable hours. Of course, getting hired there is basically impossible unless you do an appellete clerkship, cure cancer, etc.
Kirkland is obviously TCR to the actual question. I'm not sure that... well, really, anyone... would say otherwise.
Edit: And yeah, Jenner's DC office is in a fairly elite tier - wouldn't surprise me if it bleeds over to the Chicago office in some circles.
Bartlit is TCR, though, even though not biglaw (so, again, not really the question asked). They pay better than Kirkland (according a few people I know at Kirkland,) arguably do the same or better work, and do not deal with billable hours. Of course, getting hired there is basically impossible unless you do an appellete clerkship, cure cancer, etc.
Kirkland is obviously TCR to the actual question. I'm not sure that... well, really, anyone... would say otherwise.
Edit: And yeah, Jenner's DC office is in a fairly elite tier - wouldn't surprise me if it bleeds over to the Chicago office in some circles.
- patrickd139
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:53 pm
Re: Chicago Litigation
Looking at their roster, I'm not even sure curing cancer would get a foot in the door.ToTransferOrNot wrote: Bartlit is TCR, though, even though not biglaw (so, again, not really the question asked). They pay better than Kirkland (according a few people I know at Kirkland,) arguably do the same or better work, and do not deal with billable hours. Of course, getting hired there is basically impossible unless you do an appellete clerkship, cure cancer, etc.
-
- Posts: 428544
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Litigation
Well, for one, it's impossible for entry-level attorneys by definition. Bartlit operates on a "diamond" model, not pyramid. Indeed, the notion of a diamond model was coined by Bartlit himself. The firm focuses hiring on attorneys who have acquired a significant amount of prestigious experiences, while paying little attention to people fresh out of law school (or at least, fresh out of law school without something else really prestigious lined up).Looking at their roster, I'm not even sure curing cancer would get a foot in the door.
I find their selectivity quite humorous given Bartlit's academic pedigree; then again, they might take a chance on a not-so-stellar law school graduate, but a graduate who eventually becomes a rustle-and-tussle lawyer in practice.
Another funny bit about Bartlit is his role on the investigation committee against BP. Some people have accused him of having a significant conflict of interest since he was once a major partner at Kirkland, the firm now doing BP's defense litigation arising from the oil spill.
-
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: Chicago Litigation
They do hire some people directly out of post law school clerkships, FYI.
- patrickd139
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:53 pm
Re: Chicago Litigation
From the looks of their website, that's how a majority of the new associates come on board...Either way, second year associates arguing bet-the-business litigation in front of the Seventh Circuit is srs bidniz.ToTransferOrNot wrote:They do hire some people directly out of post law school clerkships, FYI.
-
- Posts: 428544
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Litigation
See what I wrote before:ToTransferOrNot wrote:They do hire some people directly out of post law school clerkships, FYI.
The firm focuses hiring on attorneys who have acquired a significant amount of prestigious experiences, while paying little attention to people fresh out of law school (or at least, fresh out of law school without something else really prestigious lined up).
-
- Posts: 428544
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Litigation
See: Diamonds are This Firm's Best Friend
http://www.bartlit-beck.com/about-news-122.html
http://www.bartlit-beck.com/about-news-122.html
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login