Anyone enjoy biglaw?
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:46 pm
Just curious...I always read about people hating biglaw etc...so I'd like to know-do you know anyone who liked working at a large law firm?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=134562
HahaCGI Fridays wrote:The women's husband in the TLS article about being in a biglaw relationship liked it.
This. You won't find too many higher ups hating the work. They might regret missing family etc, but they will enjoy the work.nealric wrote:The rate of dissatisfaction tends to be highest with the most junior people. This is for two reasons:
#1: Junior people usually get lower quality work
#2: The people who really dislike the work generally get out before they get past the Junior level
The above holds in most career tracks.
My dad used to (and still does) work 60-80 hour weeks. He's a workaholic. He has no hobbies, doesn't watch sports, etc. His contact with friends is limited to lunches near work and the occasional dinner party. He doesn't really take vacations and works through the weekend.nealric wrote:The rate of dissatisfaction tends to be highest with the most junior people. This is for two reasons:
#1: Junior people usually get lower quality work
#2: The people who really dislike the work generally get out before they get past the Junior level
The above holds in most career tracks.
The idea that the only people who enjoy biglaw are antisocial workaholics is very untrue. Most people who enjoy biglaw like it because they are genuinely interested in the work. They are people who enjoy giving advice and/or advocating on behalf of a client, and like the sense of power and responsibility that comes with working on big deals/cases. Sure, there are some who ignore their families, but certainly not all. A lot perform superhuman feats of endurance to be there for their families and for their jobs.
+1. My dad is a retired attorney. he worked at a large firm. He made good money. He worked hard. He didn't miss birthdays, and rarely missed a soccer game. Heres my two cents from growing up with a big-law dad (though this was in a secondary market so it's probably not reflective of some of the largest markets): There would be a week stretch where I never saw my dad, except for in the morning before school; sometimes a two week stretch. Then he would be home for dinner every night for a few weeks... He may have averaged 50 or 60 hours a week, but working 48 weeks a year, 55 hours per week is just not the way it works (thank god).rayiner wrote:y dad used to (and still does) work 60-80 hour weeks. He's a workaholic. He has no hobbies, doesn't watch sports, etc. His contact with friends is limited to lunches near work and the occasional dinner party. He doesn't really take vacations and works through the weekend.
Yet, he's always been very involved with his family. He made conscious trade-offs. His time is either spent working or attending to his family. When my brother and I were teenagers, his schedule would involve working in the morning (we got up at noon), taking us to lunch, working some more, making us dinner, then working some more until bed.
Ultimately, you gotta pick what you want. You can have a demanding career and a family but you gotta realize that those two will occupy 100% of your time. If you also want an active social life and friends, etc, or hobbies and time to yourself, something will have to give.
Great post. For what it is worth, I read an article once that said law students are most concerned with firm prestige, compensation, and chance of making partner. Whereas people who have actually practiced preferred quality of work, being treated with respect by their partners/peers, and quality of training they were receiving on the job.reasonable_man wrote:If you find yourself at a place with good interesting work and respectful friendly bosses, you are way more likely to enjoy it, irrespective of the actual number of hours your working. To me, this is the issue most young lawyers face. The ones that have awful assholes as bosses tend to hate it. The ones who have good bosses with interesting work tend to enjoy it. To me, its much less about the institution of a law firm (big, medium or small), than it is about the quality of the work and the people you are working with that make the biggest difference in how happy you are with your career as a young attorney. I left a mid-sized firm for a small firm on wall street. I am beyond happy I did. I work almost as much, but I'm way happier while i'm working because the quality of the people and the work is better than it was before..
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:Great post. For what it is worth, I read an article once that said law students are most concerned with firm prestige, compensation, and chance of making partner. Whereas people who have actually practiced preferred quality of work, being treated with respect by their partners/peers, and quality of training they were receiving on the job.reasonable_man wrote:If you find yourself at a place with good interesting work and respectful friendly bosses, you are way more likely to enjoy it, irrespective of the actual number of hours your working. To me, this is the issue most young lawyers face. The ones that have awful assholes as bosses tend to hate it. The ones who have good bosses with interesting work tend to enjoy it. To me, its much less about the institution of a law firm (big, medium or small), than it is about the quality of the work and the people you are working with that make the biggest difference in how happy you are with your career as a young attorney. I left a mid-sized firm for a small firm on wall street. I am beyond happy I did. I work almost as much, but I'm way happier while i'm working because the quality of the people and the work is better than it was before..
I think this is one reason why WE before law school is the way to go. Work enough jobs and you quickly realize that it doesn't really matter how much money you make if you hate the work you do, have awful co-workers or bosses, or have no life/friends/family/time.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:Great post. For what it is worth, I read an article once that said law students are most concerned with firm prestige, compensation, and chance of making partner. Whereas people who have actually practiced preferred quality of work, being treated with respect by their partners/peers, and quality of training they were receiving on the job.reasonable_man wrote:If you find yourself at a place with good interesting work and respectful friendly bosses, you are way more likely to enjoy it, irrespective of the actual number of hours your working. To me, this is the issue most young lawyers face. The ones that have awful assholes as bosses tend to hate it. The ones who have good bosses with interesting work tend to enjoy it. To me, its much less about the institution of a law firm (big, medium or small), than it is about the quality of the work and the people you are working with that make the biggest difference in how happy you are with your career as a young attorney. I left a mid-sized firm for a small firm on wall street. I am beyond happy I did. I work almost as much, but I'm way happier while i'm working because the quality of the people and the work is better than it was before..
The problem is that there is often no accurate way to evaluate how you will be treated or what kind of training you will get before you start a job. Every firm says they are "collegial" and "value training", but not all do. If you are interviewing with a firm of any size, you will never meet the less friendly people- as they won't be put on interview schedules.Whereas people who have actually practiced preferred quality of work, being treated with respect by their partners/peers, and quality of training they were receiving on the job.
I totally agree with you on that. I am still in law school too so I can totally vouch to all the nice wining and dining. That said, I think it is undeniable law student's are hyper concerned with prestige, money, etc.nealric wrote:The problem is that there is often no accurate way to evaluate how you will be treated or what kind of training you will get before you start a job. Every firm says they are "collegial" and "value training", but not all do. If you are interviewing with a firm of any size, you will never meet the less friendly people- as they won't be put on interview schedules.Whereas people who have actually practiced preferred quality of work, being treated with respect by their partners/peers, and quality of training they were receiving on the job.
Moreover, law students aren't really able to compare biglaw to small law or government because the hiring timelines are different.
The problem law students face is this: Not only are you desperately trying to find a place that will give you the training foundation you need your career in a market that doesn't really value people without experience, you are doing it in the dark.