Choosing an Offer. Help!
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:32 pm
So I currently have two offers pending, with one more possible. I'm originally from southeastern Michigan, and my girlfriend is from northeastern Ohio. We both would like to be close(ish) to our families. Here are my choices in terms of full time employment:
Firm #1: Medium-Large Chicago firm, primarily transactional/corporate. 145K/yr (2500 wk/summer). 1850 billables (actual not just stated). Decent partnership prospects. Out of debt in 4-10 years.
Firm #2: Large (relative) Western Michigan firm, strong regional presence. 100K/yr (1750 wk/summer). 1700 billables (generally about 2000 worked). Great partnership prospects. Out of debt in 7-15 years.
With the CoL adjustments, income is still about 5-20K greater at the Chicago firm. For those that don't know, this part of Michigan is doing well economically and is not dependent on the auto industry like Detroit. I am trying to way the pros and cons right now, but I would like some more opinions. Basically my thinking do far is this: Chicago would be great for a few years, but long term I would not want to raise my (theoretical) children there, and the commute from the Chi suburbs is soul crushing. Yes it would be fun while young and I could get out of debt quicker, but is it worth sacrificing substantial time with my/her parents and depriving them of a meaningful relationship with their (theoretical) grand kids? On the other hand, I will certainly have to watch my budget in West MI. In terms of "balla millionaire" status, probably talking closer to 50 than 40. But housing is super cheap, and Grand Rapids is about as cool of a small city as one can find, and its growing fast. Still far from her parents, but much closer to mine.
Thoughts, opinion, analysis welcome.
Also, if anyone knows the typical salary scale increases for 100K starters I would appreciate it.
Firm #1: Medium-Large Chicago firm, primarily transactional/corporate. 145K/yr (2500 wk/summer). 1850 billables (actual not just stated). Decent partnership prospects. Out of debt in 4-10 years.
Firm #2: Large (relative) Western Michigan firm, strong regional presence. 100K/yr (1750 wk/summer). 1700 billables (generally about 2000 worked). Great partnership prospects. Out of debt in 7-15 years.
With the CoL adjustments, income is still about 5-20K greater at the Chicago firm. For those that don't know, this part of Michigan is doing well economically and is not dependent on the auto industry like Detroit. I am trying to way the pros and cons right now, but I would like some more opinions. Basically my thinking do far is this: Chicago would be great for a few years, but long term I would not want to raise my (theoretical) children there, and the commute from the Chi suburbs is soul crushing. Yes it would be fun while young and I could get out of debt quicker, but is it worth sacrificing substantial time with my/her parents and depriving them of a meaningful relationship with their (theoretical) grand kids? On the other hand, I will certainly have to watch my budget in West MI. In terms of "balla millionaire" status, probably talking closer to 50 than 40. But housing is super cheap, and Grand Rapids is about as cool of a small city as one can find, and its growing fast. Still far from her parents, but much closer to mine.
Thoughts, opinion, analysis welcome.
Also, if anyone knows the typical salary scale increases for 100K starters I would appreciate it.