Dropping one of two secondary journals
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 6:54 pm
I have decided to drop one of my two secondary journals. I was told by my OCS that they will contact employers. I already have an offer. Will this affect anything?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=133582
MrAnon wrote:Sounds like douchebag city. Do they know where you work? if not, don't tell. If they know then so what? Ever see the editor in chief not wash his hands in the restroom? Maybe you should call his employer and tell them about it.
If you are on 2 journals it won't affect anything. If you are on 1 journal it won't affect anything. A compelling reason to drop is always helpful.
It is not sleazy to rescind an offer if double journal membership played a role in hiring. The bottom line is that the committee made a decision based on inaccurate information. OP: they almost certainly will not rescind, but be proactive and tell the recruiting dept.LawyerBlog wrote:The only way it should make a difference is if your firm is looking for an excuse to rescind an offer. If so, it would be a sleazy thing for the firm to do, but these times are first times for a lot of things. Otherwise, no one expects 2 journals anyway.
SPAM REMOVED BY MODS
+1ToTransferOrNot wrote:MrAnon wrote:Sounds like douchebag city. Do they know where you work? if not, don't tell. If they know then so what? Ever see the editor in chief not wash his hands in the restroom? Maybe you should call his employer and tell them about it.
If you are on 2 journals it won't affect anything. If you are on 1 journal it won't affect anything. A compelling reason to drop is always helpful.![]()
YEah, because informing employers that the applicant's resume is now inaccurate is such a douche move. Particularly after someone has agreed to be on a journal - thus taking a spot someone else could have had.
Here's hoping there's an indication on OP's transcript re: the dropped journal, too. That's what happens here. Call to the employer, indication on the transcript, and it shows up on C&F. Don't agree to do things you won't do. OP was an idiot to agree to do two journals, but once you've obligated yourself to doing it, you do it.
Not if you plan to quit one or both.Bosque wrote:Why were you on two to begin with? Seems like a good way to kill your grades and your work quality at the journals.
No one is arguing that it will. That said, I can't pretend to know how 250 hiring committees view that kind of commitment on a resume.LawyerBlog wrote:A double journal will never be the difference for getting an offer.
Kohinoor wrote:Not if you plan to quit one or both.Bosque wrote:Why were you on two to begin with? Seems like a good way to kill your grades and your work quality at the journals.
I only got one offer through 2L OCI. I was on the wait list for that job for over a month. All of my interviewers had my secondary journal circled on the resume when I went in for my interviews.Anonymous User wrote:There should be a stickied thread that reads: Secondary journals are worthless, only no one at your school will tell you that, otherwise there would be no one to staff the aforementioned pointless journals.
People don't get jobs because they were on the Journal of Law and Social Change.
If I could change anything from 1L, I would never have agreed to be on a secondary, and wouldn't have given a second thought to law review write-on wasteland.
circling lines on resumes doesn't mean shit. all of my interviewers had circled my study abroad experience and hometown, but I didn't get offers because I spent a year in Cairo.ToTransferOrNot wrote:I only got one offer through 2L OCI. I was on the wait list for that job for over a month. All of my interviewers had my secondary journal circled on the resume when I went in for my interviews.Anonymous User wrote:There should be a stickied thread that reads: Secondary journals are worthless, only no one at your school will tell you that, otherwise there would be no one to staff the aforementioned pointless journals.
People don't get jobs because they were on the Journal of Law and Social Change.
If I could change anything from 1L, I would never have agreed to be on a secondary, and wouldn't have given a second thought to law review write-on wasteland.
Is it possible that I would have gotten the job without the journal? Sure. But your post is hyperbole and a half.
Also - you're a fool if you think that an editorial board position on a secondary doesn't make up for at least a bit of pain not having LR does to a resume, when clerkship season roles around. Is it a significant aid? No - but it helps a bit, and a bit is the difference between striking out and having a job, ITE.
Long story short - you're wrong.
Quite the opposite. At least half a dozen interviewers asked me about responsibilities on my secondary journal. Two of them served on the exact same journal and commented on how they thought it was a great experience.Anonymous User wrote:There should be a stickied thread that reads: Secondary journals are worthless, only no one at your school will tell you that, otherwise there would be no one to staff the aforementioned pointless journals.
I wonder if this is school dependent. None of my interviewers even mentioned my secondary (which might be one of the top two or three at my school, but I don't think that means much). Everyone I know at my CCN is on a secondary, so maybe it's just so standard that it's not worth noticing?concurrent fork wrote:Quite the opposite. At least half a dozen interviewers asked me about responsibilities on my secondary journal. Two of them served on the exact same journal and commented on how they thought it was a great experience.Anonymous User wrote:There should be a stickied thread that reads: Secondary journals are worthless, only no one at your school will tell you that, otherwise there would be no one to staff the aforementioned pointless journals.
Also, there is no need for this to be anonymous.
The thing is, if everyone is on a secondary at your school, then it becomes noticeable if you don't have that resume line. Either way, it's noticeable.Anonymous User wrote:I wonder if this is school dependent. None of my interviewers even mentioned my secondary (which might be one of the top two or three at my school, but I don't think that means much). Everyone I know at my CCN is on a secondary, so maybe it's just so standard that it's not worth noticing?concurrent fork wrote:Quite the opposite. At least half a dozen interviewers asked me about responsibilities on my secondary journal. Two of them served on the exact same journal and commented on how they thought it was a great experience.Anonymous User wrote:There should be a stickied thread that reads: Secondary journals are worthless, only no one at your school will tell you that, otherwise there would be no one to staff the aforementioned pointless journals.
Also, there is no need for this to be anonymous.
At the schools I've been at, the journal has the authority to force the information, if it's necessary for some reason. Given the amount of headache someone quitting would cause, I can pretty much guarantee that any editorial board would take the time. My secondary did it once last year - a 3L didn't get his Comment done, so his journal membership was revoked, the employer was contacted, etc. And this was after all of the staffer's cite-checking responsibilities were over (3Ls don't do any of that) - so the staffer's failure didn't actually inconvenience anyone.SBL wrote:Since I don't really care what happens to OP one way or the other, I'll offer the following advice: Quit one of them and chance it. Sure, they *might* tell your employer, but that sounds like BS to me. How would they even know where you've accepted? Plus which, I'm sure you could explain to your firm why you needed to drop one secondary journal to focus on your grades. I doubt that two illustrious semesters of cite-checking the family law journal will really be the difference between them wanting to employ you and otherwise.
I know someone who did Law Review (ended up EIC,) a secondary (ended up EIC,) and Moot Court.Renzo wrote:It would never, never, never have occured to me to join two journals, even if my school didn't forbid it. Why is TLS full of people who a) thought it would be a good idea, and b) are surprised when it turned out not to be.