struck out at oci-now what?
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:23 am
any way to land biglaw? 

Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=130663
Yeah, I don't think OP cares about Vault rankings. I also don't think any of the trouble "ITE" is people turning away from 100K jobs b/c they are not called "biglaw." Are these jobs going unfilled? What are you talking about?Anonymous User wrote:The best solution is to sit down and ask yourself why biglaw has to be the end all, be all.
There are jobs out there -- jobs paying over $100k, some even at big law levels -- that don't have the prestige or vault rankings.
They may not be biglaw, but the obsession with biglaw for the sake of biglaw is contributing to some of the failures ITE.
lololAnonymous User wrote:The best solution is to sit down and ask yourself why biglaw has to be the end all, be all.
There are jobs out there -- jobs paying over $100k, some even at big law levels -- that don't have the prestige or vault rankings.
They may not be biglaw, but the obsession with biglaw for the sake of biglaw is contributing to some of the failures ITE.
Yes, there are plenty of unfilled legal jobs out there. Small law, mid law, boutiques.KMaine wrote:Yeah, I don't think OP cares about Vault rankings. I also don't think any of the trouble "ITE" is people turning away from 100K jobs b/c they are not called "biglaw." Are these jobs going unfilled? What are you talking about?Anonymous User wrote:The best solution is to sit down and ask yourself why biglaw has to be the end all, be all.
There are jobs out there -- jobs paying over $100k, some even at big law levels -- that don't have the prestige or vault rankings.
They may not be biglaw, but the obsession with biglaw for the sake of biglaw is contributing to some of the failures ITE.
The truth to your statement is highly dependent on what school your hypothetical applicant attends.Objection wrote:Yes, there are plenty of unfilled legal jobs out there. Small law, mid law, boutiques.KMaine wrote:Yeah, I don't think OP cares about Vault rankings. I also don't think any of the trouble "ITE" is people turning away from 100K jobs b/c they are not called "biglaw." Are these jobs going unfilled? What are you talking about?Anonymous User wrote:The best solution is to sit down and ask yourself why biglaw has to be the end all, be all.
There are jobs out there -- jobs paying over $100k, some even at big law levels -- that don't have the prestige or vault rankings.
They may not be biglaw, but the obsession with biglaw for the sake of biglaw is contributing to some of the failures ITE.
Of course, it somewhat depends on the school, but many firms salivate at the thought of getting, say, a Michigan grad. The problem is that it takes research and hard work to find these firms because OCS doesn't help.
The inability to land a job ITE is only partially attributable to TE.
Well, to be fair, I'm also of the opinion that if it was big law or bust, you shouldn't have gone to a school outside of the t14, and if you didn't have the option to go within t14, you shouldn't be surprised at striking out with big law in any economy.seespotrun wrote:The truth to your statement is highly dependent on what school your hypothetical applicant attends.Objection wrote:Yes, there are plenty of unfilled legal jobs out there. Small law, mid law, boutiques.KMaine wrote:Yeah, I don't think OP cares about Vault rankings. I also don't think any of the trouble "ITE" is people turning away from 100K jobs b/c they are not called "biglaw." Are these jobs going unfilled? What are you talking about?Anonymous User wrote:The best solution is to sit down and ask yourself why biglaw has to be the end all, be all.
There are jobs out there -- jobs paying over $100k, some even at big law levels -- that don't have the prestige or vault rankings.
They may not be biglaw, but the obsession with biglaw for the sake of biglaw is contributing to some of the failures ITE.
Of course, it somewhat depends on the school, but many firms salivate at the thought of getting, say, a Michigan grad. The problem is that it takes research and hard work to find these firms because OCS doesn't help.
The inability to land a job ITE is only partially attributable to TE.
Even within the T-14, your statement is probably true for only HYS and maybe CCN.Anonymous User wrote:Well, to be fair, I'm also of the opinion that if it was big law or bust, you shouldn't have gone to a school outside of the t14, and if you didn't have the option to go within t14, you shouldn't be surprised at striking out with big law in any economy.seespotrun wrote:The truth to your statement is highly dependent on what school your hypothetical applicant attends.Objection wrote:
Yes, there are plenty of unfilled legal jobs out there. Small law, mid law, boutiques.
Of course, it somewhat depends on the school, but many firms salivate at the thought of getting, say, a Michigan grad. The problem is that it takes research and hard work to find these firms because OCS doesn't help.
The inability to land a job ITE is only partially attributable to TE.
Nice to see you, too.Corsair wrote:Many people in this thread seem to have no idea what the anonymous feature is for.
The rules are enforced, and discussion of such does not belong in on-topic threads such as these, so drop it.Objection wrote:Since when are rules enforced?
vanwinkle wrote:The rules are enforced, and discussion of such does not belong in on-topic threads such as these, so drop it.Objection wrote:Since when are rules enforced?
BOOTSTRAPSObjection wrote:Yes, there are plenty of unfilled legal jobs out there. Small law, mid law, boutiques.KMaine wrote:Yeah, I don't think OP cares about Vault rankings. I also don't think any of the trouble "ITE" is people turning away from 100K jobs b/c they are not called "biglaw." Are these jobs going unfilled? What are you talking about?Anonymous User wrote:The best solution is to sit down and ask yourself why biglaw has to be the end all, be all.
There are jobs out there -- jobs paying over $100k, some even at big law levels -- that don't have the prestige or vault rankings.
They may not be biglaw, but the obsession with biglaw for the sake of biglaw is contributing to some of the failures ITE.
Of course, it somewhat depends on the school, but many firms salivate at the thought of getting, say, a Michigan grad. The problem is that it takes research and hard work to find these firms because OCS doesn't help.
The inability to land a job ITE is only partially attributable to TE.
This. I am trying mass emailing but no nibbles so far (well one small nibble but too early to see where it'll go). I've emailed probably about 30 or so in the past 2-3 days. One email reject, one automated email, one "we'll be in touch if we're interested" email, and one small nibble email about some possible interest. So it doesn't hurt to try I suppose.Anonymous User wrote:any way to land biglaw?
I'm surprised mass mails are still working. I won't bother with NY biglaw, but is it too late for NY midlaw? I've already sent out resumes to all the markets where I have some sort of tie (non-NY).Anonymous User wrote:I mass mailed about 25 firms this week. Got a callback (could be a screener, not sure how to define it) today from one of the most respected firms in my home state (you'd probably consider it midlaw).
Otherwise, no dings or anything like that. A couple automated "thank you for your interest" emails, that's about it. Still surprised to get a positive response so quickly from a respectable firm.
The midlaw firm I heard from today is based in New Jersey. Not sure how different NY would be for midlaw. Probably tougher, given that its New York, but its probably worth a shot. But get on it. Every day you delay decreases your chances big time.Anonymous User wrote:I'm surprised mass mails are still working. I won't bother with NY biglaw, but is it too late for NY midlaw? I've already sent out resumes to all the markets where I have some sort of tie (non-NY).Anonymous User wrote:I mass mailed about 25 firms this week. Got a callback (could be a screener, not sure how to define it) today from one of the most respected firms in my home state (you'd probably consider it midlaw).
Otherwise, no dings or anything like that. A couple automated "thank you for your interest" emails, that's about it. Still surprised to get a positive response so quickly from a respectable firm.