Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=130137
Winston, McDermott or Baker. No to Katten or Schiff Hardin.Anonymous User wrote:Winston, McDermott, Schiff Hardin, Baker McKenzie, Katten Muchin. Which one and why? Which would you rule out?
I would choose Katten, too. The firm is in great shape financially.Anonymous User wrote:I'd choose Katten. I heard they are one of the few Chicago firms in good shape.
Anonymous User wrote:I would choose Katten, too. The firm is in great shape financially.Anonymous User wrote:I'd choose Katten. I heard they are one of the few Chicago firms in good shape.
Cuz they told me in my interview . . . I'm kidding. Okay, it is more hearsay than anything else, but for what it's worth, I just accepted an offer with Katten.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:I would choose Katten, too. The firm is in great shape financially.Anonymous User wrote:I'd choose Katten. I heard they are one of the few Chicago firms in good shape.
how do you know?
OP, do you have offers from all those firms? Because that looks exactly like my callback season to a tee and the fact that I've heard zip from all of them frightens me - especially if you have offers on the table.Anonymous User wrote:Winston, McDermott, Schiff Hardin, Baker McKenzie, Katten Muchin. Which one and why? Which would you rule out?
i have offers from 3 of them at this point.Anonymous User wrote:OP, do you have offers from all those firms? Because that looks exactly like my callback season to a tee and the fact that I've heard zip from all of them frightens me - especially if you have offers on the table.Anonymous User wrote:Winston, McDermott, Schiff Hardin, Baker McKenzie, Katten Muchin. Which one and why? Which would you rule out?
Would you mind sharing which ones? I'm guessing that you've got Katten, Winston and Schiff - it seems like they've mobilized their offer mills.Anonymous User wrote:i have offers from 3 of them at this point.Anonymous User wrote:OP, do you have offers from all those firms? Because that looks exactly like my callback season to a tee and the fact that I've heard zip from all of them frightens me - especially if you have offers on the table.Anonymous User wrote:Winston, McDermott, Schiff Hardin, Baker McKenzie, Katten Muchin. Which one and why? Which would you rule out?
When was your cb and how long in b/w the offer?Anonymous User wrote:Cuz they told me in my interview . . . I'm kidding. Okay, it is more hearsay than anything else, but for what it's worth, I just accepted an offer with Katten.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:I would choose Katten, too. The firm is in great shape financially.Anonymous User wrote:I'd choose Katten. I heard they are one of the few Chicago firms in good shape.
how do you know?
Anonymous User wrote:What's everyone's take on Schiff?
correctAnonymous User wrote:Would you mind sharing which ones? I'm guessing that you've got Katten, Winston and Schiff - it seems like they've mobilized their offer mills.Anonymous User wrote:i have offers from 3 of them at this point.Anonymous User wrote:OP, do you have offers from all those firms? Because that looks exactly like my callback season to a tee and the fact that I've heard zip from all of them frightens me - especially if you have offers on the table.Anonymous User wrote:Winston, McDermott, Schiff Hardin, Baker McKenzie, Katten Muchin. Which one and why? Which would you rule out?
Congrats. Katten's a great firm. I have a friend who works there and he loves it. Sounds like a humane firm with interesting work.Anonymous User wrote:Cuz they told me in my interview . . . I'm kidding. Okay, it is more hearsay than anything else, but for what it's worth, I just accepted an offer with Katten.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:I would choose Katten, too. The firm is in great shape financially.Anonymous User wrote:I'd choose Katten. I heard they are one of the few Chicago firms in good shape.
how do you know?
Is this a joke?Anonymous User wrote:I'd take Sidley, Kirkland, or Mayer over any of them probably.
No they are good firms that are hiring more people. I know people that got offers at these three that struck out at the five listed. So it is still relevant information. In fact, I am one of those people.PiersonVee wrote:Is this a joke?Anonymous User wrote:I'd take Sidley, Kirkland, or Mayer over any of them probably.
you are an idiot in addition to being a douche. don't you think OP would have mentioned them if he/she had gotten offers/CBs there? but i forget that people like you constantly feel the need to proclaim to the world how great they are.Anonymous User wrote:No they are good firms that are hiring more people. I know people that got offers at these three that struck out at the five listed. So it is still relevant information. In fact, I am one of those people.PiersonVee wrote:Is this a joke?Anonymous User wrote:I'd take Sidley, Kirkland, or Mayer over any of them probably.
i have offers from 3 of them at this point.[/quote]Anonymous User wrote:OP, do you have offers from all those firms? Because that looks exactly like my callback season to a tee and the fact that I've heard zip from all of them frightens me - especially if you have offers on the table.
Ha, fair enough. At first glance, your comment seemed analogous to someone that hops on a Mich vs. Penn thread and posts that Harvard or Yale would be much better choices.Anonymous User wrote:No they are good firms that are hiring more people. I know people that got offers at these three that struck out at the five listed. So it is still relevant information. In fact, I am one of those people.PiersonVee wrote:Is this a joke?Anonymous User wrote:I'd take Sidley, Kirkland, or Mayer over any of them probably.
It is exactly analogous.PiersonVee wrote:Ha, fair enough. At first glance, your comment seemed analogous to someone that hops on a Mich vs. Penn thread and posts that Harvard or Yale would be much better choices.Anonymous User wrote:No they are good firms that are hiring more people. I know people that got offers at these three that struck out at the five listed. So it is still relevant information. In fact, I am one of those people.PiersonVee wrote:Is this a joke?Anonymous User wrote:I'd take Sidley, Kirkland, or Mayer over any of them probably.