Typical Litigator's Day v. Corp Attorney's Day
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:26 pm
Thoughts?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=129807
acr0504 wrote:Litigator- sits in at 7 hour deposition. says "objection" four times. 4 hours writing appellate brief.
Corp Attorney- reads fine print contracts for 12 hours.
Anonymous User wrote:lit = fun
corp = most boring job imaginable.
ftfyacr0504 wrote:Litigator- sits in at 7 hour deposition. says "objection" four times. 4 hours writing "relevant," "not relevant," "not relevant," "not relevant," "relevant," "not relevant."
Corp Attorney- reads fine print contracts for 12 hours.
Anonymous Loser wrote:Above post about overgeneralization is tcr.
For example:
Litigator: Stares at computer screen for 9 hours looking on Westlaw for a case that doesn't exist.
Corp. Attorney: Puts on largely ineffective Powerpoint presentation at seminar regarding changes to area of law relevant to interests of clients and potential clients; sits in on 4 1/2 hour board meeting, speaking only once to point out that business judgement rule likely protects whatever decision is under consideration.
lit - 1L writing class in your office for the rest of your lifeAnonymous User wrote:lit = fun
corp = most boring job imaginable.
bigben wrote:Varies too much to make any generalizations about the day-to-day.
bigben wrote:lit - 1L writing class for the rest of your life in your officeAnonymous User wrote:lit = fun
corp = most boring job imaginable.
corp - baller doin' deals, cigars over golf, closing parties
Yeah, but only the litigator got to bill *all* that time.Anonymous Loser wrote:Above post about overgeneralization is tcr.
For example:
Litigator: Stares at computer screen for 9 hours looking on Westlaw for a case that doesn't exist.
Corp. Attorney: Puts on largely ineffective Powerpoint presentation at seminar regarding changes to area of law relevant to interests of clients and potential clients; sits in on 4 1/2 hour board meeting, speaking only once to point out that business judgement rule likely protects whatever decision is under consideration.
sundance95 wrote:Yeah, but only the litigator got to bill *all* that time.Anonymous Loser wrote:Above post about overgeneralization is tcr.
For example:
Litigator: Stares at computer screen for 9 hours looking on Westlaw for a case that doesn't exist.
Corp. Attorney: Puts on largely ineffective Powerpoint presentation at seminar regarding changes to area of law relevant to interests of clients and potential clients; sits in on 4 1/2 hour board meeting, speaking only once to point out that business judgement rule likely protects whatever decision is under consideration.
A law grad that doesn't know shit about practicing law? NO WAYAnonymous User wrote:But, what if I know SHIT about corps?bigben wrote:lit - 1L writing class for the rest of your life in your officeAnonymous User wrote:lit = fun
corp = most boring job imaginable.
corp - baller doin' deals, cigars over golf, closing parties
bigben wrote:A law grad that doesn't know shit about practicing law? NO WAYAnonymous User wrote:But, what if I know SHIT about corps?bigben wrote:lit - 1L writing class for the rest of your life in your officeAnonymous User wrote:lit = fun
corp = most boring job imaginable.
corp - baller doin' deals, cigars over golf, closing parties
Oh yeah, the corps industry. Good point.Anonymous User wrote:I mean about the industry or something.
"Review and analyze Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Super. Ct., 47 Cal. 4th 725, 219 P. 3d 736, 742 (Cal., 2009) re issues re procedure of challenges to claims of attorney-client privilege. Draft memorandum re same. Review and analyze Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Super. Ct., 155 Cal.App.4th 1485, 1498 (2007) re issues re same. Draft memorandum re same."Anonymous User wrote:sundance95 wrote:Yeah, but only the litigator got to bill *all* that time.Anonymous Loser wrote:Above post about overgeneralization is tcr.
For example:
Litigator: Stares at computer screen for 9 hours looking on Westlaw for a case that doesn't exist.
Corp. Attorney: Puts on largely ineffective Powerpoint presentation at seminar regarding changes to area of law relevant to interests of clients and potential clients; sits in on 4 1/2 hour board meeting, speaking only once to point out that business judgement rule likely protects whatever decision is under consideration.
verdad?
ToTransferOrNot wrote:This is why bankruptcy > all. Send off the majority of the schleck work to the corporate or lit people. Focus time writing motion for reimbursement of fees. Win.
BigCo Chapter 11 frequently results in saving jobs and so on that otherwise would have been vaporized. Yeah, you sometimes kill pension plans (see: American Airlines,) but it's still better than the pension having no money for payouts after the company explodes.Anonymous User wrote:ToTransferOrNot wrote:This is why bankruptcy > all. Send off the majority of the schleck work to the corporate or lit people. Focus time writing motion for reimbursement of fees. Win.
Bankruptcy seems cool since it combines corp and lit, but, IDK, dood. I feel like I would be very depressed working bankruptcy cases. So many lives ruined, you know?