Page 1 of 1
weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:42 am
by Anonymous User
cbs at all three - ip lit - whats the verdict?
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:44 am
by Anonymous User
Which offices are these? Weil SV is pretty strong. But otherwise, Irell all the way. Better job security, better IP lit, better exit options, more money.
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:51 am
by Anonymous User
How would anyone NOT vote for Irell??? The only reason not to take it would be geography.
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:17 pm
by Anonymous User
babump
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:11 pm
by bwv812
.
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:16 pm
by radek
bwv812 wrote:Anonymous User wrote:babump
Why would you bump this (pretty stupid) question without posting the market?
The ludicrous poll responses are a good indicator of the quality of this thread.
By listing Irell, he made it pretty clear which market he was talking about.
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:34 pm
by bwv812
.
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:32 pm
by Anonymous User
OP here; why are you so irritated, if you don't like the preamble to my poll, don't vote on it - geesh.
Locations are - Redwood Shores, San Fran, Los Angeles
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:03 am
by bwv812
.
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:05 am
by Anonymous User
well, okay, good point.
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:28 am
by Anonymous User
dumb question op here; ended up getting an offer from, and choosing Irell. Glad to see it was the popular one.
In my defense, I didn't realize that these firms had significant IP practices in non-California offices, to me - if anyone knows enough about IP lit to vote on this poll, they'd know which offices I'm referring to.