Change in Selectivity/Prestige of non-HQ Offices
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 1:55 pm
I've heard that different offices have different reputations and can have different hiring criteria. How true is this? Are offices that aren't the firm's headquarters less prestigious/selective than the firm's main office?
I'm particularly asking for firms in the V10-V25 range. I'm top 5-10% at a T20 and I'm only going to bid on NYC offices. While I would love to work for a Simpson/Cleary/Weil type firm, they're probably a little out of my reach. But, most firms in the V10-V25 range aren't HQed in NY.
Is Covington/Arnold and Porter NY easier to get than Covington/Arnold and Porter DC?
Kirkland/Sidely NY easier than Kirkland/Sidely Chicago?
Ropes NY easier than Ropes Boston?
I'm particularly asking for firms in the V10-V25 range. I'm top 5-10% at a T20 and I'm only going to bid on NYC offices. While I would love to work for a Simpson/Cleary/Weil type firm, they're probably a little out of my reach. But, most firms in the V10-V25 range aren't HQed in NY.
Is Covington/Arnold and Porter NY easier to get than Covington/Arnold and Porter DC?
Kirkland/Sidely NY easier than Kirkland/Sidely Chicago?
Ropes NY easier than Ropes Boston?