Above-market firms Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 3:56 am
Above-market firms
Out of curiosity, which firms pay above market? With the exception of Wachtell (which I realize is because of the bonus, not the base), I have only ever heard people say "some boutiques."
-
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 2:52 pm
Re: Above-market firms
No firm that hires entry level attorneys is paying "above market." So don't worry about that.expat wrote:Out of curiosity, which firms pay above market? With the exception of Wachtell (which I realize is because of the bonus, not the base), I have only ever heard people say "some boutiques."
What you need to worry about are the firms that pay below market or are about to pay below market or have slashed their bonuses or about to withdraw offers before the summer even starts or plan on no offering half of the class or decide they are no offering half the class during the final week of the summer or plan on announcing the deferral of your full time start date fall 3L year or announce it the summer after you graduate or wait until a month before your start date to indefinitely defer you or withdraw your offer outright or hire you and then "Latham" you 6 months later or hire you etc...
- Rand M.
- Posts: 757
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 8:24 am
Re: Above-market firms
Wachtell's base-pay is actually 165k, so slightly above market. Boies comes to mind as one that does hire entry level and pays slightly above market. For the most part we're talking about 5-10k over, so nothing drastic.
-
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:24 pm
Re: Above-market firms
Well that's not really true.Voyager wrote:No firm that hires entry level attorneys is paying "above market." So don't worry about that.expat wrote:Out of curiosity, which firms pay above market? With the exception of Wachtell (which I realize is because of the bonus, not the base), I have only ever heard people say "some boutiques."
Wachtell, Susman Godfrey, Kellogg Huber Hansen and Williams and Connolly all pay above market (Wachtell and Susman due to bonus, W&C and Kellogg due to higher base pay).
Here are Susman's bonuses (outsize compared to market): --LinkRemoved--
Wachtell ranges from 50%-100% of base typically.
W&C I believe starts its associates at $170K or $175k, but pays smaller bonuses.
That said, OP, to have a shot at any of these firms you will have to be Top 10% + law review at a T6 (not exaggerating), so don't worry about it.
-
- Posts: 428551
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Above-market firms
Keep in mind W&C doesn't pay bonuses, which made them below market many years.imchuckbass58 wrote:Well that's not really true.Voyager wrote:No firm that hires entry level attorneys is paying "above market." So don't worry about that.expat wrote:Out of curiosity, which firms pay above market? With the exception of Wachtell (which I realize is because of the bonus, not the base), I have only ever heard people say "some boutiques."
Wachtell, Susman Godfrey, Kellogg Huber Hansen and Williams and Connolly all pay above market (Wachtell and Susman due to bonus, W&C and Kellogg due to higher base pay).
Here are Susman's bonuses (outsize compared to market): --LinkRemoved--
Wachtell ranges from 50%-100% of base typically.
W&C I believe starts its associates at $170K or $175k, but pays smaller bonuses.
That said, OP, to have a shot at any of these firms you will have to be Top 10% + law review at a T6 (not exaggerating), so don't worry about it.
Accurate advice though - a laughably tiny fraction of first year associates make above market, and any place where you can do so it will be because of the absurd hiring selectivity.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- RVP11
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:32 pm
Re: Above-market firms
Boies Schiller also pays $174k, at all of their offices.imchuckbass58 wrote:Well that's not really true.Voyager wrote:No firm that hires entry level attorneys is paying "above market." So don't worry about that.expat wrote:Out of curiosity, which firms pay above market? With the exception of Wachtell (which I realize is because of the bonus, not the base), I have only ever heard people say "some boutiques."
Wachtell, Susman Godfrey, Kellogg Huber Hansen and Williams and Connolly all pay above market (Wachtell and Susman due to bonus, W&C and Kellogg due to higher base pay).
Here are Susman's bonuses (outsize compared to market): --LinkRemoved--
Wachtell ranges from 50%-100% of base typically.
W&C I believe starts its associates at $170K or $175k, but pays smaller bonuses.
That said, OP, to have a shot at any of these firms you will have to be Top 10% + law review at a T6 (not exaggerating), so don't worry about it.
- Wahoo1L
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:35 am
Re: Above-market firms
Williams & Connolly pays 180k w/ no bonuses.
Boies also pays above market and gives above market bonuses based upon hours. So if you work 3000 hours, you'll earn more than a person who worked 2500 hours.
Boies also pays above market and gives above market bonuses based upon hours. So if you work 3000 hours, you'll earn more than a person who worked 2500 hours.
-
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:17 am
Re: Above-market firms
Are you guys just searching for the most unobtainable jobs in support of this ridiculous "market-plus" salary thread? Seriously, more people have commanded the Space Shuttle than have ever been associates at Susman. The firms you are discussing are competing with one another over impeccably pedigreed 9th/2d/D.C Cir./SCOTUS clerks: of course they pay more than firms hiring students off of the Fordham Law Review.
-
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2009 10:17 pm
Re: Above-market firms
According to their website, Wachtell has partners from Fordham and Associates from Rutgers. I'm sure ITE its a lot tougher, but don't count anyone out.imchuckbass58 wrote:Well that's not really true.Voyager wrote:No firm that hires entry level attorneys is paying "above market." So don't worry about that.expat wrote:Out of curiosity, which firms pay above market? With the exception of Wachtell (which I realize is because of the bonus, not the base), I have only ever heard people say "some boutiques."
Wachtell, Susman Godfrey, Kellogg Huber Hansen and Williams and Connolly all pay above market (Wachtell and Susman due to bonus, W&C and Kellogg due to higher base pay).
Here are Susman's bonuses (outsize compared to market): --LinkRemoved--
Wachtell ranges from 50%-100% of base typically.
W&C I believe starts its associates at $170K or $175k, but pays smaller bonuses.
That said, OP, to have a shot at any of these firms you will have to be Top 10% + law review at a T6 (not exaggerating), so don't worry about it.
I am out of the t6 but I hope to be partner at Wachtell some day... being pessimistic won't get me there.
- thesealocust
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm
Re: Above-market firms
oops
Last edited by thesealocust on Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428551
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Above-market firms
Though Kirkland pays market for base salaries, I've heard that bonuses are typically above market, depending on your hours. Some (though not many) even got Skadden-level bonuses in 2008.
- TTT-LS
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:36 pm
Re: Above-market firms
,
Last edited by TTT-LS on Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428551
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Above-market firms
also clarifying: while i dropped kirkland as an example, it wasnt meant to be an example of an above-market paying unattainable firm. i posted it because i think it's not nearly as unattainable as the other firms mentioned in this thread, and gives you a decent shot of making above market.
also, boies is not that unattainable either. they try to recruit the best and the brightest, but those students often have offers at firms with better cultures (i.e., firms with a significant number of equity partners, near 100% SA offer rate, more diversified practices, etc.)
edit: I think Kramer Levin and Irell do some degree of profit-sharing for their associates. Kramer is not that hard to get at all from a top law school, and top third or so at a place like Columbia should give you a good shot at Irell.
also, boies is not that unattainable either. they try to recruit the best and the brightest, but those students often have offers at firms with better cultures (i.e., firms with a significant number of equity partners, near 100% SA offer rate, more diversified practices, etc.)
edit: I think Kramer Levin and Irell do some degree of profit-sharing for their associates. Kramer is not that hard to get at all from a top law school, and top third or so at a place like Columbia should give you a good shot at Irell.
- BradyToMoss
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:00 pm
Re: Above-market firms
You won't become an associate at Wachtell coming from outside of the t6 (MVP could have an outside chance). Yes, they have a couple partners who aren't from that mold, but something tells me they brought quite the impressive resume/book by the time they headed over to Wachtell.
As mentioned, outside of Wachtell a few places will pay a little better than 160k+ NYC Bonus. W&C does the $180k with no bonus, Boies pays a slightly higher base, Irell has consistently paid 160k with a bonus roughly double in size to the standard bonus NYC firms have been giving out the last few years.
As mentioned, outside of Wachtell a few places will pay a little better than 160k+ NYC Bonus. W&C does the $180k with no bonus, Boies pays a slightly higher base, Irell has consistently paid 160k with a bonus roughly double in size to the standard bonus NYC firms have been giving out the last few years.
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 8:21 am
Re: Above-market firms
MV have 0 chance, since WLRK doesnt recruit at those schools. P has a good chance relative to the rest of the T14, but not as good as HYS. It's so hard to tell because WLRK's summer class is btw 20-30 students every year and the distribution changes.(MVP could have an outside chance).
- BradyToMoss
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:00 pm
Re: Above-market firms
I remembered seeing a couple associates from MVP when I went through their site, just couldn't remember which one of the 3 so I wanted to throw in a disclaimer to my t6 comment. Now that you mention it, I think Penn was the only one of the 3 listed as an associate's school.RisingMichigan3L wrote:MV have 0 chance, since WLRK doesnt recruit at those schools. P has a good chance relative to the rest of the T14, but not as good as HYS. It's so hard to tell because WLRK's summer class is btw 20-30 students every year and the distribution changes.(MVP could have an outside chance).
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 8:21 am
Re: Above-market firms
Michigan had 1 a while ago:
http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~ch ... Resume.pdf
yeah. if you're as good as that guy, you will get WLRK.
http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~ch ... Resume.pdf
yeah. if you're as good as that guy, you will get WLRK.
- BradyToMoss
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:00 pm
Re: Above-market firms
Actually just went through again, 8 or 9 associates from Penn. Also two associates with J.D.s from Northwestern, both also had an MBA From Kellogg though. A Cornell, Notre Dame and 2 Howard J.D.s listed as associates as well.RisingMichigan3L wrote:Michigan had 1 a while ago:
http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~ch ... Resume.pdf
yeah. if you're as good as that guy, you will get WLRK.
-
- Posts: 428551
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Above-market firms
cornell and ND guys are interesting. howard not so much, since WLRK recruits on campus there (I realize that doesnt count for much, but getting a screening interview>>>>>>>>>>>>sending in a resume)
- underdawg
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:15 am
Re: Above-market firms
wow what a climberRisingMichigan3L wrote:Michigan had 1 a while ago:
http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~ch ... Resume.pdf
yeah. if you're as good as that guy, you will get WLRK.
Last edited by underdawg on Sun Jan 28, 2018 12:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:42 am
Re: Above-market firms
Among current associates who graduated from law school in the last 5 years (2005-2009), 9 T14s are represented:RisingMichigan3L wrote:MV have 0 chance, since WLRK doesnt recruit at those schools. P has a good chance relative to the rest of the T14, but not as good as HYS. It's so hard to tell because WLRK's summer class is btw 20-30 students every year and the distribution changes.(MVP could have an outside chance).
Harvard: 22
Columbia: 14
NYU: 11
Penn: 10
Yale:10
Stanford:7
Chicago: 6
Northwestern: 2
Duke: 1
Zero for GULC, Cornell, Michigan, Virginia, and Berkeley.
- Hiei
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:37 pm
Re: Above-market firms
They definitely hire people from UVA every so often. Many of them just left Wachtell for other firms.thechee wrote:Among current associates who graduated from law school in the last 5 years (2005-2009), 9 T14s are represented:RisingMichigan3L wrote:MV have 0 chance, since WLRK doesnt recruit at those schools. P has a good chance relative to the rest of the T14, but not as good as HYS. It's so hard to tell because WLRK's summer class is btw 20-30 students every year and the distribution changes.(MVP could have an outside chance).
Harvard: 22
Columbia: 14
NYU: 11
Penn: 10
Yale:10
Stanford:7
Chicago: 6
Northwestern: 2
Duke: 1
Zero for GULC, Cornell, Michigan, Virginia, and Berkeley.
http://www.davispolk.com/lawyers/scott-luftglass/
One thing people have to realize about a firm like Wachtell is that working there for a few years and then lateraling can actually be a very attractive thing. When you have worked at a small elite firm like Wachtell (or Williams and Conolly, Boies, Munger etc.) where you get real experience (unlike at many of the other massive V10 firms where you don't get to touch much substantive work) you are a very attractive hire. Actually if you want to make partner at firms like Kirkland and Skadden, you have a better shot working at a small firm that gives substantive work and then lateraling to the larger firms.
- RVP11
- Posts: 2774
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:32 pm
Re: Above-market firms
You're putting way too much stock in where the firm recruits. WLRK also does OCI at UCLA/Texas/Howard, but you can bet your ass someone who is top of the class at Virginia/Michigan/Duke probably has just as good or better chances.RisingMichigan3L wrote:MV have 0 chance, since WLRK doesnt recruit at those schools. P has a good chance relative to the rest of the T14, but not as good as HYS. It's so hard to tell because WLRK's summer class is btw 20-30 students every year and the distribution changes.(MVP could have an outside chance).
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 8:21 am
Re: Above-market firms
I, actually, am going to disagree with this. But this is my opinion, so whatever.but you can bet your ass someone who is top of the class at Virginia/Michigan/Duke probably has just as good or better chances
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login