Bad Grades but still offered OCI?
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:27 am
(Note to mods: Anonymous because my regular account name is readily identifiable by those attending my school and I'm not interested in being that guy who makes his success in scoring an interview known or in having my grades public knowledge. If you don't think this should be anonymous, let me know so I can clear the post of information before you reveal my account name.)
My grades aren't stellar (I like to say I'm in the top 80-85% of the class), but I applied for spring 1L OCI out of sheer stubbornness.
My grade distribution is C+, B-, B+, B+, A- (in legal writing, also included fact that I earned highest grade in class on final open memo on resume). Grade problems primarily due to strategic issues with the exam format in the first two exams I took (C+ and B- ), but I resolved them on last two exams to earn median grades (B+). I attend a T30.
I've got decent work experience, one job that particularly translates well to the law. Cover letter and resume carefully crafted to create a brand presenting me as a quick learner, went from having no background in previous field to a go-to resource for industry leading clients in a matter of 1-2 months. I'm hoping this will help my cause with clients reluctant to spend money on associates who don't know what they're doing.
Anyway, I somehow got an interview with a firm I'd really like to work for. I realize the grade issue makes me a long shot, but I doubt they're interviewing anyone and everyone. So, what does it mean that a firm would interview someone with my grade issues? I'd be surprised if people didn't respond with something sarcastic about this being a waste of my time, but do firms regularly interview students with poor grades just for the hell of it? Does anyone have experience with this themselves or know someone who had below median grades, but got a decent firm interview?
The firm in question has over 250 attorneys, regional southeastern and DC offices, and doesn't seem like a small firm.
I'm hoping this means they like everything else they see — I put a lot into tailoring my resume and cover letter for their firm and summer program — and they hope I can put their grade concerns to rest.
Any insight?
My grades aren't stellar (I like to say I'm in the top 80-85% of the class), but I applied for spring 1L OCI out of sheer stubbornness.
My grade distribution is C+, B-, B+, B+, A- (in legal writing, also included fact that I earned highest grade in class on final open memo on resume). Grade problems primarily due to strategic issues with the exam format in the first two exams I took (C+ and B- ), but I resolved them on last two exams to earn median grades (B+). I attend a T30.
I've got decent work experience, one job that particularly translates well to the law. Cover letter and resume carefully crafted to create a brand presenting me as a quick learner, went from having no background in previous field to a go-to resource for industry leading clients in a matter of 1-2 months. I'm hoping this will help my cause with clients reluctant to spend money on associates who don't know what they're doing.
Anyway, I somehow got an interview with a firm I'd really like to work for. I realize the grade issue makes me a long shot, but I doubt they're interviewing anyone and everyone. So, what does it mean that a firm would interview someone with my grade issues? I'd be surprised if people didn't respond with something sarcastic about this being a waste of my time, but do firms regularly interview students with poor grades just for the hell of it? Does anyone have experience with this themselves or know someone who had below median grades, but got a decent firm interview?
The firm in question has over 250 attorneys, regional southeastern and DC offices, and doesn't seem like a small firm.
I'm hoping this means they like everything else they see — I put a lot into tailoring my resume and cover letter for their firm and summer program — and they hope I can put their grade concerns to rest.
Any insight?