Page 1 of 1
BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:30 pm
by AlanShore
--LinkRemoved--
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:35 pm
by Space_Cowboy
Yes. Its the graduating class of 2008. People were still getting high off of vapors from the real estate bubble.
Most schools' classes of 2008 did well.....
BTW, a good number of associates of this class got canned in December of 2008 when firms started tightening their belts.
EDIT: Quick ATL search got me this (--LinkRemoved--)
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:36 pm
by AlanShore
ah. okay. yeah, im sure many did. obviously i'm not going to either of these schools expecting anything close to those numbers. I'm just weighing BU/BC against fordham and those are the only statistics that are out. I guess they are pretty close then, right? BC seems to place a little bit more in clerkships though.
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:38 pm
by rayiner
AlanShore wrote:http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/services/ ... stics.html
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
That's 53% of the 67% in law firms. So ~37% of the class.
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:39 pm
by AlanShore
rayiner wrote:AlanShore wrote:http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/services/ ... stics.html
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
That's 53% of the 67% in law firms. So ~37% of the class.
oh whoops. totally right. thanks.
why the discrepancy with the above chart then, do you think?
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:41 pm
by Space_Cowboy
rayiner wrote:AlanShore wrote:http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/services/ ... stics.html
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
That's 53% of the 67% in law firms. So ~37% of the class.
Um.... It actually is 53% of the ENTIRE CLASS that got employed at a firm with 101+ attorneys. However, that cut-off is not necessarily Big Law.
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:47 pm
by jchoggan
AlanShore wrote:rayiner wrote:AlanShore wrote:http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/services/ ... stics.html
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
That's 53% of the 67% in law firms. So ~37% of the class.
oh whoops. totally right. thanks.
why the discrepancy with the above chart then, do you think?
Nope. Your original analysis was correct. It claims there are 67% of the entire class in law firms. 53% in big firms, 8% in small, and 6% in medium. 53+8+6 = 67. Either way, 37% might be more accurate ITE.
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:49 pm
by AlanShore
jchoggan wrote:AlanShore wrote:rayiner wrote:AlanShore wrote:http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/services/ ... stics.html
I know this is obviously when the economy was much much better.. but almost the entire class is reporting.
67% of the class getting big law (or close) or a clerkship? Those are some mighty high numbers. Is BC's job prospects that much better than Fordham's?
That's 53% of the 67% in law firms. So ~37% of the class.
oh whoops. totally right. thanks.
why the discrepancy with the above chart then, do you think?
Nope. Your original analysis was correct. It claims there are 67% of the entire class in law firms. 53% in big firms, 8% in small, and 6% in medium. 53+8+6 = 67. Either way, 37% might be more accurate ITE.
ah okay. It probably is lower than 37% now.. but regardless I just wanted to compare general job prospects of boston schools vs fordham. I guess they are a little better.
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 8:25 pm
by Corsair
..
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:31 pm
by AlanShore
Corsair wrote:"*Students not seeking employment are not included in the percentages."
I'm curious how they decided that? Part of me suspects they just took everyone who was unemployed and declared "well these people must not be actually looking for jobs, so we won't count them."
true, i was wondering the same thing. i know BC places very well but these stats are a little TOO well in my opinion. maybe im just a pessimist..
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:35 am
by Bankhead
About the same as Fordham's 2008 class, then. Very similar employment stats, and quite impressive before ITE.
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:52 am
by gollymolly
.
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:56 am
by Bankhead
gollymolly wrote:I remember some posts from earlier this year about how crazy low BC's success rate in OCI was, something like 20-30 students getting summer positions. I could be wrong though ...
Yeah, they got crushed.
Re: BC 2008 employment stats.. real???
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:03 am
by AlanShore
Bankhead wrote:gollymolly wrote:I remember some posts from earlier this year about how crazy low BC's success rate in OCI was, something like 20-30 students getting summer positions. I could be wrong though ...
Yeah, they got crushed.
did they get crushed harder than any of the other schools? if so, for what reason?
20-30 students.. that seems a bit low..