Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=43528
I managed to keep TLS blocked all weekend and today. Taking a cheating break as a "cookie" to make up for burning myself making dinner.Lizface killah wrote:TLSin' in Class. Taking Questions.
ooo how do you block yourself? I really need to. Though, in my defense, it was intro to shit everyone who has ever spent time in a law firm already knows day in Civ Pro.rayiner wrote:I managed to keep TLS blocked all weekend and today. Taking a cheating break as a "cookie" to make up for burning myself making dinner.Lizface killah wrote:TLSin' in Class. Taking Questions.
Nice.Corsair wrote:I demand to be added to various people's gchat lists. smith.jared
Corsair looks just like this...Lizface killah wrote:Nice.Corsair wrote:I demand to be added to various people's gchat lists. smith.jared
--ImageRemoved--
ProTip: Apex is worthless.N2012 wrote:I can not find the apex file for legal reasoning on the blackboard site. Any ideas? It is supposed to be in the law school pre-arrival folder. This file seems no where to be found on my blackboard. Is apex blackboard separate from the general one?
If you're on a Mac, try Glimmer Blocker. You can block websites by host name.Lizface killah wrote:ooo how do you block yourself? I really need to. Though, in my defense, it was intro to shit everyone who has ever spent time in a law firm already knows day in Civ Pro.rayiner wrote:I managed to keep TLS blocked all weekend and today. Taking a cheating break as a "cookie" to make up for burning myself making dinner.Lizface killah wrote:TLSin' in Class. Taking Questions.
Are you talking about Conley?rayiner wrote:Our civ pro prof keeps getting philosophical and I have to resist the inclnation to be in a constant state of eye rolling. Is the moral justification for common law systems really going to be on the exam? Will I be required to analyze natural law as such a possible justification for the Illinois bar?
I get the pedagogical purpose I just resent the submarine philosophy class. I'm a big fan of answering "why?" with "just because!"Lizface killah wrote:Are you talking about Conley?rayiner wrote:Our civ pro prof keeps getting philosophical and I have to resist the inclnation to be in a constant state of eye rolling. Is the moral justification for common law systems really going to be on the exam? Will I be required to analyze natural law as such a possible justification for the Illinois bar?
That shit does go deep.
rayiner wrote:Allen. I get the pedagogical purpose I just resent the submarine philosophy class. I'm a big fan of answering "why?" with "just because!"Lizface killah wrote:Are you talking about Conley?rayiner wrote:Our civ pro prof keeps getting philosophical and I have to resist the inclnation to be in a constant state of eye rolling. Is the moral justification for common law systems really going to be on the exam? Will I be required to analyze natural law as such a possible justification for the Illinois bar?
That shit does go deep.
If our prof would quit with the philosophical tangents maybe we wouldve gotten to discussing some cases... Or, um, law...Lizface killah wrote:rayiner wrote:Allen. I get the pedagogical purpose I just resent the submarine philosophy class. I'm a big fan of answering "why?" with "just because!"Lizface killah wrote:Are you talking about Conley?rayiner wrote:Our civ pro prof keeps getting philosophical and I have to resist the inclnation to be in a constant state of eye rolling. Is the moral justification for common law systems really going to be on the exam? Will I be required to analyze natural law as such a possible justification for the Illinois bar?
That shit does go deep.
Conley v. Gibson...
It wasn't even in the context of a case.rayiner wrote:
If our prof would quit with the philosophical tangents maybe we wouldve gotten to discussing some cases... Or, um, law...
Lupo got philosophical today but there was actually a point to it: to help us understand the complexity of the law surrounding damages. That I can understand...hmlee wrote:Friedman is great, but my favorite prof is Lupo. He's funny when he's walking around fishing for points...
No, were just exploring the nature of common and from whence it derives it's moral justification. I don't see cases in our future for awhile, though they certainly are in the reading which I do dutifully if futiley.Lizface killah wrote:It wasn't even in the context of a case.rayiner wrote:
If our prof would quit with the philosophical tangents maybe we wouldve gotten to discussing some cases... Or, um, law...
Someone told me that "What do lions, wolves and water have to do with Civil Procedure?" was an actual exam question in the past.rayiner wrote:Our civ pro prof keeps getting philosophical and I have to resist the inclnation to be in a constant state of eye rolling. Is the moral justification for common law systems really going to be on the exam? Will I be required to analyze natural law as such a possible justification for the Illinois bar?
I'm still waiting on mine. The email I got said within 48 hours and it has now been 49 1/2. I want my money!hmlee wrote:Has anyone who signed up for direct deposit received their funds yet? I'm still waiting on mine and am getting impatient...