Penn admits' UG institution?
Posted: Sat May 02, 2009 4:25 pm
To all those accepted at Penn, can anybody confirm or deny the prestigious UG requirement for admission?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=70917
Look on LSN. Plenty of people with non-prestigious UGs are getting in, I'm sure.CrossingMyFingers wrote:To all those accepted at Penn, can anybody confirm or deny the prestigious UG requirement for admission?
I currently attend a TTT undergrad (Seton Hall) and will most likely be attending Penn Law with a smallish scholarsihp. It's not a requirement. That would be ridiculous. But is it unusual for a top school to want students from top schools?CrossingMyFingers wrote:To all those accepted at Penn, can anybody confirm or deny the prestigious UG requirement for admission?
Agreed. I have on problem admitting that most of the people I know who attended Ivies and other top schools are a heck of a lot smarter than most of the people I know here at Seton Hall. There are exceptions, of course. But if there is any kind of bias, its a bias towards better applicants. Which is hardly surprising.sbalive wrote:There's a correlation between undergrad prestige/rank and LSAT scores of applicants. So, it's impossible to conclude a bias or preference based on the proportion of students with that background at a top law school.
wtf?darkarmour wrote:hmm, i see. upenn state - philly. That's the one with dickinson school of law, right? they're ranked pretty high this year
yeah, penn state philly, dickinson school of law - they're ranked 8th this year, right?green wrote:wtf?darkarmour wrote:hmm, i see. upenn state - philly. That's the one with dickinson school of law, right? they're ranked pretty high this year
Is this a joke?darkarmour wrote:yeah, penn state philly, dickinson school of law - they're ranked 8th this year, right?green wrote:wtf?darkarmour wrote:hmm, i see. upenn state - philly. That's the one with dickinson school of law, right? they're ranked pretty high this year
Perhaps Penn merely realizes that Stanford undergrad is where rich kids who couldn't get into Berkeley go & disrespects it accordingly?HotelLautreamont wrote:Based on the LSAC "Prelaw Advisor Action Report" for my school, I'd say Penn gives less of a benefit to students from elite UGs than any of its peers. In 06-07 (the most recent year for which I have numbers) here are the applicant stats from Stanford UG for Penn and some of its peer schools:
Numbers are the mean LSAT/GPA of the group.
UVA: 66 applicants, 165.7/3.59. 27 accepted, 170.6/3.69 (41% acceptance rate)
Michigan: 82 applicants, 165.8/3.60. 26 accepted, 170.5/3.69 (32% acceptance rate)
Chicago: 88 applicants, 165.8/3.64. 23 accepted, 169.3/3.70 (26% acceptance rate)
Boalt: 156 applicants, 164.6/3.59. 51 accepted, 168.3/3.75 (33% acceptance rate)
Penn: 85 applicants, 165.4/3.61. 16 accepted, 168.8/3.86 (19% acceptance rate)
Percentage-wise, for Stanford undergrads, Penn was also tougher to get into than NYU, Columbia, Stanford, and Harvard, and had the same acceptance rate as Yale. The numbers from 05-06, even though it was an easier year overall, show a similar general pattern. I can say that this mirrored my own experience this cycle, as I was waitlisted at Penn, despite showing a lot of interest, having a decent profile, and getting into NYU and Columbia. As to why they do this, I can't say. I'm sure their admissions office has a lot of information built up - maybe they've found it best not to admit high percentages of elite UG students with numbers within their ranges because these students end up getting into better schools - in 05-06, only 2 out of 24 admits attended Penn, and in 06-06, it was 3 out of 16. Not that it's neccessarily a YP tactic - I just don't know.
But to answer your original question, no, I don't think there's any sort of unofficial "elite UG requirement" at Penn. If anything, you've got a better shot there (comparatively) than at a lot of other schools.
Where do you go, if you don't mind me asking?underachiever wrote:Nope, I went to a TTT undergrad and I'm in
....my school is actually very close to caoyun's
+1sbalive wrote:There's a correlation between undergrad prestige/rank and LSAT scores of applicants. So, it's impossible to conclude a bias or preference based on the proportion of students with that background at a top law school.
Thanks for bumping a 9 month old thread with that nugget of information. I'm sure most people on this site needed clarification, because there's no way that darkarmour's responses could've been sarcastic!Vanessa583 wrote:Just to clarify for those who are confused. The University of Pennsylvania is NOT Penn State. It's an Ivy League University in Philadelphia & is ranked as a Top 10 Law School. It is generally called Penn, not to be confused with Penn State.
hahaha people who go to penn are so insecureSal Paradise wrote:Thanks for bumping a 9 month old thread with that nugget of information. I'm sure most people on this site needed clarification, because there's no way that darkarmour's responses could've been sarcastic!Vanessa583 wrote:Just to clarify for those who are confused. The University of Pennsylvania is NOT Penn State. It's an Ivy League University in Philadelphia & is ranked as a Top 10 Law School. It is generally called Penn, not to be confused with Penn State.
Hahaha how's Joe P doing?Vanessa583 wrote:Just to clarify for those who are confused. The University of Pennsylvania is NOT Penn State. It's an Ivy League University in Philadelphia & is ranked as a Top 10 Law School. It is generally called Penn, not to be confused with Penn State.
ITT: Fucked Out Jokesdarkarmour wrote:wait, which upenn state campus are you talking about? The one in philly or the one in State College?