magically morphed into Sonius?MidwestJosh wrote:Random thought: Anyone know where Mikey/LSATAhhh/etc disappeared to?
(it's "piqued my interest" OP, FYI.)
magically morphed into Sonius?MidwestJosh wrote:Random thought: Anyone know where Mikey/LSATAhhh/etc disappeared to?
They are not analogous in the patent world. So in which state can you litigate if you're a patent agent? You threw out a specific example and as someone who works in patent myself, I'd love to learn this little bit of trivia.Sonius wrote:
and yes, prosecution does not equal litigation, but they are many times analogy to one another.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
You are, by far, the biggest idiot to post on this site, and that says a lot.Sonius wrote:lol you work in patent and yet you're on the pre law school board site? not quite congruous, is it? there's a causal link there (lol, thanks LSAT!)
anyway, in re: to the patent bar; take, for instance, one who passes the patent bar in California and wishes to practice in New York state, for instance. If he also passes the bar in New York state (without going to law school), that doesn't necesarily mean that one does not have the knowledge or experience to litigate JUST BECAUSE HE FOREWENT LAW SCHOOL!
anyway, that was my entire point from my original post, that law school is not ncessary for passing of a bar in many states. the posters that kept mentioning Vermont derailed this thread..
FLAME....nice job altSonius wrote:lol you work in patent and yet you're on the pre law school board site? not quite congruous, is it? there's a causal link there (lol, thanks LSAT!)
anyway, in re: to the patent bar; take, for instance, one who passes the patent bar in California and wishes to practice in New York state, for instance. If he also passes the bar in New York state (without going to law school), that doesn't necesarily mean that one does not have the knowledge or experience to litigate JUST BECAUSE HE FOREWENT LAW SCHOOL!
anyway, that was my entire point from my original post, that law school is not ncessary for passing of a bar in many states. the posters that kept mentioning Vermont derailed this thread..
Too amazing!Sonius wrote:
...but thanks for informing me and peeking my interest so that I know to watch out for grammar nazis (this is what other message baords have called you people) (I think it's really rude of those anti-semetic message boards you frequent to be comparing enforcement of the basic rules of grammar to the murderous, genocidal nazis. It belittles the great tragedy that occurred because of them. You should tell that other site to call them "grammar crusaders")
you're the flame, not me.
and this indecent(PICS OR IT DIDN"T HAPPEN) and condescending PM (private message)(Damn, I always wondered what that stood for!) from the same poster interestedbyestander :
What a freaking whiner, you are. You have no business going to law school, you are a complete idiot. (and yes, please mention that I said that to everyone in a private message also. LOL) I LOVE GOSSIP LIKE THIS POST MORE PLEASE
So if you have so much knowledge from the LSAT, I'm sure you did wonderfully on it! And if you did so great on the LSAT how come you dont want to go to law school? Or are you just not able to GET INTO law school?Sonius wrote:lol you work in patent and yet you're on the pre law school board site? not quite congruous, is it? there's a causal link there (lol, thanks LSAT!)
anyway, in re: to the patent bar; take, for instance, one who passes the patent bar in California and wishes to practice in New York state, for instance. If he also passes the bar in New York state (without going to law school), that doesn't necesarily mean that one does not have the knowledge or experience to litigate JUST BECAUSE HE FOREWENT LAW SCHOOL!
anyway, that was my entire point from my original post, that law school is not ncessary for passing of a bar in many states. the posters that kept mentioning Vermont derailed this thread..
forewent? can anyone define this word for me haha?Sonius wrote:lol you work in patent and yet you're on the pre law school board site? not quite congruous, is it? there's a causal link there (lol, thanks LSAT!)
anyway, in re: to the patent bar; take, for instance, one who passes the patent bar in California and wishes to practice in New York state, for instance. If he also passes the bar in New York state (without going to law school), that doesn't necesarily mean that one does not have the knowledge or experience to litigate JUST BECAUSE HE FOREWENT LAW SCHOOL!
anyway, that was my entire point from my original post, that law school is not ncessary for passing of a bar in many states. the posters that kept mentioning Vermont derailed this thread..
Agreed. I feel like I need a box of popcorn and a soda.interestedbyestander wrote:Hey, give the OP credit, he's entertained a whole lot of people for awhile now.
Sort of like the village idiot.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
vee wrote:Agreed. I feel like I need a box of popcorn and a soda.interestedbyestander wrote:Hey, give the OP credit, he's entertained a whole lot of people for awhile now.
Sort of like the village idiot.
Please continue, OP!
Oh, and whyamidoingthis, I would try to explicate forewent to you, but I think you can look it up yourself as in re: a dictionary or something.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
The OP definitely boosted my post count.interestedbyestander wrote:Hey, give the OP credit, he's entertained a whole lot of people for awhile now.
Sort of like the village idiot.
If you're talking about IamAnXman on LSD, I am familiar with him very wellyou rebel scum wrote:i like this troll better than the hipster troll. the patent prosecution = patent litigation thing is too priceless. and there was someone who posted on another message board who would insert self-lols at uncomfortable intervals. hmmmmm.
You know you need a thorough knowledge of the English language to practice law in this country, right?Sonius wrote:If you're talking about IamAnXman, I am familiar with him very wellyou rebel scum wrote:i like this troll better than the hipster troll. the patent prosecution = patent litigation thing is too priceless. and there was someone who posted on another message board who would insert self-lols at uncomfortable intervals. hmmmmm.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
amazingSonius wrote:If you're talking about IamAnXman on LSD, I am familiar with him very wellyou rebel scum wrote:i like this troll better than the hipster troll. the patent prosecution = patent litigation thing is too priceless. and there was someone who posted on another message board who would insert self-lols at uncomfortable intervals. hmmmmm.
Codescending! Owners of the site! hahahahaha this is so good. okay, who did this flame, i want to give a round of applause.Sonius wrote: such codescending and beguiling responses are allienating and i assuredly doubt that the owners of this site would appreciate you antagonizing new customers and potential forum users.
could it be the revenge of the ghost of Katfid?waldodanto wrote:Codescending! Owners of the site! hahahahaha this is so good. okay, who did this flame, i want to give a round of applause.Sonius wrote: such codescending and beguiling responses are allienating and i assuredly doubt that the owners of this site would appreciate you antagonizing new customers and potential forum users.
I'm a noob and don't know who Katfid is, but I agree that this is a great flame.waldodanto wrote:Codescending! Owners of the site! hahahahaha this is so good. okay, who did this flame, i want to give a round of applause.Sonius wrote: such codescending and beguiling responses are allienating and i assuredly doubt that the owners of this site would appreciate you antagonizing new customers and potential forum users.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login