Retake or move forward with application?
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2020 9:48 am
This is a major "good problem to have" situation, and I hope it doesn't come off as a humble brag, because I'm really hoping for input and advice:
I just got my May LSAT-Flex score: I scored a 176. On most of my practice tests (and almost all of the recent ones), I've scored in the 177-180 range. I think I wasn't quite as well-suited for the LSAT-Flex as for the regular LSAT, since I'm much stronger at LR than RC (not that I'm complaining - I'm thrilled to have been able to put up a 176).
The argument in my mind for retaking:
- It can't hurt
- I've been scoring higher (even if only slightly), so there's a solid chance I'll be able to improve by a point or two, especially if I can take a regular LSAT instead of the Flex
- Higher LSAT = better admissions results
The argument against retaking:
- I've already scored high enough that another point isn't going to alter my chances. According to the data I looked at, 176 is already above every 75th percentile from the last five years except for Yale's 2015 and 2018 numbers, where 176 was the 75th percentile LSAT.
- Taking and prepping for the LSAT is stressful, and not worth doing if the reason is neurotic perfectionism and not a real improvement in likely outcomes or in likelihood of achieving certain outcomes
- The time would be better spent polishing the rest of my application and making sure I can submit early in order to have the highest number of seats/$ available when I apply
So far, I'm definitely leaning towards not retaking. I told myself before the test and before receiving my score that anything 177+ would be a no-brainer, and that I'd think about anything 176 or below. But looking at the 509 and the myLSN data (which, ironically, shows that a 176 would actually be *better* for most of the tippity-top schools, but I'm sure that's anomalous), I'm thinking that the difference between 176 and 177 (or 176 and 179, for that matter) is going to be negligible - especially since my GPA will also be above the 75th percentile.
Background:
- Undergrad in History & Psychology (double-major) from no-name undergrad (started out at CC)
- 4.0 GPA (but a lot of CLEP credits, so that doesn't cover as many classes as it would if I hadn't done those - not sure if that matters)
- Not K-JD, but won't have a ton of work experience or a terribly impressive resume, as I'm still pretty young
- Non-URM
Thoughts? I'm particularly interested to hear how you think the decision whether or not to retake will impact my chances at YHS (especially Y/S), or for the cream of the crop scholarships (i.e. Ruby/Hamilton/etc.)
Thanks in advance
I just got my May LSAT-Flex score: I scored a 176. On most of my practice tests (and almost all of the recent ones), I've scored in the 177-180 range. I think I wasn't quite as well-suited for the LSAT-Flex as for the regular LSAT, since I'm much stronger at LR than RC (not that I'm complaining - I'm thrilled to have been able to put up a 176).
The argument in my mind for retaking:
- It can't hurt
- I've been scoring higher (even if only slightly), so there's a solid chance I'll be able to improve by a point or two, especially if I can take a regular LSAT instead of the Flex
- Higher LSAT = better admissions results
The argument against retaking:
- I've already scored high enough that another point isn't going to alter my chances. According to the data I looked at, 176 is already above every 75th percentile from the last five years except for Yale's 2015 and 2018 numbers, where 176 was the 75th percentile LSAT.
- Taking and prepping for the LSAT is stressful, and not worth doing if the reason is neurotic perfectionism and not a real improvement in likely outcomes or in likelihood of achieving certain outcomes
- The time would be better spent polishing the rest of my application and making sure I can submit early in order to have the highest number of seats/$ available when I apply
So far, I'm definitely leaning towards not retaking. I told myself before the test and before receiving my score that anything 177+ would be a no-brainer, and that I'd think about anything 176 or below. But looking at the 509 and the myLSN data (which, ironically, shows that a 176 would actually be *better* for most of the tippity-top schools, but I'm sure that's anomalous), I'm thinking that the difference between 176 and 177 (or 176 and 179, for that matter) is going to be negligible - especially since my GPA will also be above the 75th percentile.
Background:
- Undergrad in History & Psychology (double-major) from no-name undergrad (started out at CC)
- 4.0 GPA (but a lot of CLEP credits, so that doesn't cover as many classes as it would if I hadn't done those - not sure if that matters)
- Not K-JD, but won't have a ton of work experience or a terribly impressive resume, as I'm still pretty young
- Non-URM
Thoughts? I'm particularly interested to hear how you think the decision whether or not to retake will impact my chances at YHS (especially Y/S), or for the cream of the crop scholarships (i.e. Ruby/Hamilton/etc.)
Thanks in advance