Transfer Question: Do 1L school matter?
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:32 pm
Hey guys, so I'm perfectly aware that we shouldn't go to law school looking to transfer but here's a question that I had in my head:
Do law schools really care about WHERE a transfer applicant went to law school for 1L? Is a 3.8 at a T20 viewed the same as a 3.8 from a T50?
Let's be real, for first-year applications, law schools don't really give a crap where an applicant got his/her 3.9 (they're lying if they tell you otherwise). Law schools definitely do not care if an applicant got his/her 3.90 UG GPA from UC Santa Barbara or Berkeley. A 3.9 is a 3.9.
So, is it the same for transfer applicants as well? Or does someone with great 1L grades from a T20 have an advantage over another applicant with similar grades from a T50/T3? Is a 3.8 from WashUSTL the same as a 3.8 from Fordham?
Furthermore is a 3.7 from Vandy viewed favorably over a 3.9 from South Dakota Law?
Do law schools really care about WHERE a transfer applicant went to law school for 1L? Is a 3.8 at a T20 viewed the same as a 3.8 from a T50?
Let's be real, for first-year applications, law schools don't really give a crap where an applicant got his/her 3.9 (they're lying if they tell you otherwise). Law schools definitely do not care if an applicant got his/her 3.90 UG GPA from UC Santa Barbara or Berkeley. A 3.9 is a 3.9.
So, is it the same for transfer applicants as well? Or does someone with great 1L grades from a T20 have an advantage over another applicant with similar grades from a T50/T3? Is a 3.8 from WashUSTL the same as a 3.8 from Fordham?
Furthermore is a 3.7 from Vandy viewed favorably over a 3.9 from South Dakota Law?