Law
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 9:21 pm
Law school
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=272944
Hello.Dropshot wrote:Hi,
Don't even think about it for the first few years of college. Seriously. That'll maximize your chances. Being focused on something you can't actually do for another five years will drive you nuts and wear you out and make everyone think you're bizarre.Dropshot wrote:I'm a high school senior who might be interested in law school. Is there any advice you could give to an incoming college student on how to maximize their chances? I know admissions is mostly LSAT and GPA.
Undeclared. If "maximizing my GPA" is how you pick a major, you aren't ready for a major. Go undeclared, take things you find interesting, figure it out. I changed my major four times. No major is better than any other for law school (yes, there are data about majors that do better and worse on the LSAT, but that's not because those majors prepare you for the LSAT as much as the fact the people drawn to and succeeding in those majors have the skills the LSAT tests), and when admissions looks at GPAs, they consider (1) where you went and (2) what you majored in. A chemical engineering major whose school's grades are as un-inflated as Tom Brady's balls can have a lower GPA than the median and be okay.Dropshot wrote:I'll be attending a top 5 LAC and majoring in something humanities-related. Would an Econ, or English, or Philosophy degree be okay? My school definitely does not have grade inflation (unlike Harvard or Yale or Brown), and given the importance of GPA, I do wonder what the best route to take would be. Philosophy and Econ are likely harder (though I'm sure English is also rigorous), but I don't want to disregard Econ because there's a chance I might choose to work in the finance world rather than go to law school, and my school has very well-regarded and well-connected economics department, faculty, and alums.
The back half of my senior year of high school was spent the way all the other parts of high school were spent: trying to get girls I liked to also like me. The only difference was I was admitted to college, so I stopped trying, but I had only ever really tried my junior year and the first part of senior year because I didn't care about college until then.Dropshot wrote:Any advice? What were you doing your second semester senior year of high school? Was law school even on your mind?
This is legit advice. And law schools will always be willing to take your money if we're wrong.JohannDeMann wrote:Don't do law. The future is computer science, data analytics, engineering, and finance/business.
Thanks for all the advice! English is actually my favorite subject, but I'm quite intimidated by college English courses due to what you just said -- their subjectivity. For me, Economics is harder, but there's less of a chance for subjective grading (you also know how to improve your grade if you're not doing up to par), so I was considering that. Plus, the fact that Economics seems slightly more versatile -> career in finance.arroznueve wrote:Hello.Dropshot wrote:Hi,
Don't even think about it for the first few years of college. Seriously. That'll maximize your chances. Being focused on something you can't actually do for another five years will drive you nuts and wear you out and make everyone think you're bizarre.Dropshot wrote:I'm a high school senior who might be interested in law school. Is there any advice you could give to an incoming college student on how to maximize their chances? I know admissions is mostly LSAT and GPA.
Undeclared. If "maximizing my GPA" is how you pick a major, you aren't ready for a major. Go undeclared, take things you find interesting, figure it out. I changed my major four times. No major is better than any other for law school (yes, there are data about majors that do better and worse on the LSAT, but that's not because those majors prepare you for the LSAT as much as the fact the people drawn to and succeeding in those majors have the skills the LSAT tests), and when admissions looks at GPAs, they consider (1) where you went and (2) what you majored in. A chemical engineering major whose school's grades are as un-inflated as Tom Trump Supporter Brady's balls can have a lower GPA than the median and be okay.Dropshot wrote:I'll be attending a top 5 LAC and majoring in something humanities-related. Would an Econ, or English, or Philosophy degree be okay? My school definitely does not have grade inflation (unlike Harvard or Yale or Brown), and given the importance of GPA, I do wonder what the best route to take would be. Philosophy and Econ are likely harder (though I'm sure English is also rigorous), but I don't want to disregard Econ because there's a chance I might choose to work in the finance world rather than go to law school, and my school has very well-regarded and well-connected economics department, faculty, and alums.
So, study what you want. Which seems to be economics, to be honest.
(And while you knock English as being less difficult, you have to remember the subjectivity to grading in English. Every major has subjectively graded courses, but English has ALL subjectively graded courses. Good luck getting consistent grades as an English major).
The back half of my senior year of high school was spent the way all the other parts of high school were spent: trying to get girls I liked to also like me. The only difference was I was admitted to college, so I stopped trying, but I had only ever really tried my junior year and the first part of senior year because I didn't care about college until then.Dropshot wrote:Any advice? What were you doing your second semester senior year of high school? Was law school even on your mind?
Law school was not on my mind.
Which brings me to one other thing: if, and it's a huge if at your age, you do want to be a lawyer...you'd be wise to not be a K–J.D. student. After you finish your undergraduate degree, work for two years. You'll be glad you did. You'll have an improved financial position for law school, but you'll also have something on your résumé to get interviews, something to talk about at interviews, and something to reference as experience when you're in job situations. It will also really, really test if you want to go to law school, and may help you avoid making the mistake of doing something you focused in on at a young age without fully exploring the alternate paths.
Enjoy the rest of high school. Good luck!
SorryRaceJudicata wrote:Enjoy your LAC. In a few years, when you quit using that hilarious phrase, you can come back (with an LSAT score) and determine if law is right for you.
Enjoy college! It flies by so much faster than you think it will.Dropshot wrote:SorryRaceJudicata wrote:Enjoy your LAC. In a few years, when you quit using that hilarious phrase, you can come back (with an LSAT score) and determine if law is right for you.What are you referring to?
EDIT: Are you referring to my usage of "top-tier LAC"?
I don't want it to sound like I'm bragging, I just meant to say that despite my lack of focus the first two years of high school (to my detriment), things did work out well for me in the end, but I also have to attribute this to luck. So I'm trying to avoid not knowing the process, which was a big mistake I made during high school.
Or if you're referring to my original post, I meant to give a rough idea of what institution I will be attending -- but now I realize that undergrad reputation doesn't matter in law school admissions, or at least not to the extent of something like Wall Street recruiting.
Wrong forum bud. You want top-lac-schools.com/forumsDropshot wrote:SorryRaceJudicata wrote:Enjoy your LAC. In a few years, when you quit using that hilarious phrase, you can come back (with an LSAT score) and determine if law is right for you.What are you referring to?
EDIT: Are you referring to my usage of "top-tier LAC"?
I don't want it to sound like I'm bragging, I just meant to say that despite my lack of focus the first two years of high school (to my detriment), things did work out well for me in the end, but I also have to attribute this to luck. So I'm trying to avoid not knowing the process, which was a big mistake I made during high school.
Or if you're referring to my original post, I meant to give a rough idea of what institution I will be attending -- but now I realize that undergrad reputation doesn't matter in law school admissions, or at least not to the extent of something like Wall Street recruiting.
so true.... and if you have CS EE background, you can get in a good law school, do patent law, make some money.JohannDeMann wrote:Don't do law. The future is computer science, data analytics, engineering, and finance/business.
I pretty much agree with all of this. Except for the me being dumb part. I'm only like 50/50 on that one. My point stands. Not all STEM majors are created equal. That said, if you can 3.8 a CS, EECS, or Econ degree and those subjects interest you, by all means, go for it.pancakes3 wrote:Nobody is impressed by a liberal arts college. All that your Sarah Lawrence degree signals is that (1) you didn't have the grades to attend an Ivy*, and (2) you didn't have the sense to attend a public Ivy**. All you can do now is fight that presumption by majoring in something useable like Econ.
Econ is probably also your best bet at a high GPA because the grading is the least subjective out of all the social sciences. If you can't hack the math though, you should probably stay away.
Also, take that wall of textual advice above by AJordan with a grain of salt. I didn't sift through it but skimming through, I saw a reference to H1B visas. H1B visas are work visas that allow U.S. companies to hire foreign workers (usually foreign-born college graduates of U.S. schools). There's a cap on H1B visas at 65k/year (with an extra 20,000 spots for advanced degrees). It's forecasted that the cap will drop with the Trump administration. So given that context, I'm really not sure about the point he's trying to make. Tl;dr, the guy sounds like a dumb, so don't take the advice of dumbs.
*not the literal ivy league, but ivy-tier
**not a literal public school, but the tier just shy of the ivy's
Ha, Sarah Lawrence was one of my safeties, now that you mention the schoolpancakes3 wrote:Nobody is impressed by a liberal arts college. All that your Sarah Lawrence degree signals is that (1) you didn't have the grades to attend an Ivy*, and (2) you didn't have the sense to attend a public Ivy**. All you can do now is fight that presumption by majoring in something useable like Econ.
Econ is probably also your best bet at a high GPA because the grading is the least subjective out of all the social sciences. If you can't hack the math though, you should probably stay away.
Also, take that wall of textual advice above by AJordan with a grain of salt. I didn't sift through it but skimming through, I saw a reference to H1B visas. H1B visas are work visas that allow U.S. companies to hire foreign workers (usually foreign-born college graduates of U.S. schools). There's a cap on H1B visas at 65k/year (with an extra 20,000 spots for advanced degrees). It's forecasted that the cap will drop with the Trump administration. So given that context, I'm really not sure about the point he's trying to make. Tl;dr, the guy sounds like a dumb, so don't take the advice of dumbs.
*not the literal ivy league, but ivy-tier
**not a literal public school, but the tier just shy of the ivy's
Listen. If you're serious about law school, take courses emphasizing language and logic. I majored in something I was passionate about (that has relatively little critical thinking) and I regretted it immensely when it came time to study the LSAT. Your undergraduate education should prepare you to do well on the LSAT. Double majoring in Philosophy and English would actually be a pretty good idea, but only if you can handle the courseload. My friends that majored in philosophy, rhetoric, etc., did wonderfully on the LSAT in a short period of time (e.g., 3 months), whereas I struggled with it for almost a year only to end up with a score 5 points above my diagnostic. Do your due diligence.Dropshot wrote: Thanks everyone so far for their advice -- just didn't realize law school people were this hostile and snarkyI guess you can call me naïve or a special snowflake.
![]()
You're in the middle of a particularly toxic Venn diagram that includes members of the legal profession and anonymous internet commenters.Dropshot wrote:Thanks everyone so far for their advice -- just didn't realize law school people were this hostile and snarkyI guess you can call me naïve or a special snowflake.
![]()