What's considered early vs late in the application cycle?
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2016 9:50 pm
More specifically, how much worse are my chances in November vs September?
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=268743
floatie wrote:Overall your chances aren't going to be significantly worse in November vs September; both are early. You won't be at a position where you're at a disadvantage until roughly January. Even still, if your stats are up to par at a certain school you'll still be alright after January
Yeah, this. The earlier the better, but if applying in November means applying with an LSAT score that's 2 points higher, do that.KMart wrote:floatie wrote:Overall your chances aren't going to be significantly worse in November vs September; both are early. You won't be at a position where you're at a disadvantage until roughly January. Even still, if your stats are up to par at a certain school you'll still be alright after January
Where can I listen to your podcast?MikeSpivey wrote:I'm going to record a 10-15 minute podcast on this very topic, which some quotes from a dean of admissions at a top 10 school, and with Danielle Early our newest Associate Partner formally of Harvard Law. We will do it this week!
Should I read that as "formerly"? I assume nobody simultaneously works for a consulting group and an admissions office. Excited to hear the podcast!MikeSpivey wrote:I'm going to record a 10-15 minute podcast on this very topic, which some quotes from a dean of admissions at a top 10 school, and with Danielle Early our newest Associate Partner formally of Harvard Law. We will do it this week!
Ha! Yes I was outside in the sun on my laptop and still sensed something felt odd, but should have scrutinized! Formerly!lsatrecycles wrote:Should I read that as "formerly"? I assume nobody simultaneously works for a consulting group and an admissions office. Excited to hear the podcast!MikeSpivey wrote:I'm going to record a 10-15 minute podcast on this very topic, which some quotes from a dean of admissions at a top 10 school, and with Danielle Early our newest Associate Partner formally of Harvard Law. We will do it this week!
Thanks Spivey! Helpful as always
i've calmed down considerably
Spivey, I thought it was interesting how you mentioned candidates were separated by various qualities before the initial reading of their application. I'm curious as to how exactly this works for URM candidates, and if there is any difference in timelines for individuals in this category, or perhaps it is more or less the same?
Please do more podcasts!
All good, you did it the right way!TexasENG wrote:Great info, thanks Spivey! Also, I hope you don't mind, I posted this in the UVA thread too. I'm sure that is where a some people's anxiety is coming from atm.