.
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:57 am
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=265935
This. A couple extra points will do wonders for you and your shots at HYS. Upside is huge, especially since you were PTing higher than what you scored. Think you'll be in for a great cycle OPyaliehopeful wrote:You have great softs and with your current score you have an okay chance at H, not as great of a chance at Y/S however. A 169 is an excellent score but I reckon you're capable of scoring in the low to mid 170s in which case you'd be a shoe in at Harvard and have a greater shot at Y/S, retake. Given your rigorous work schedule re-taking won't be easy and it'll be a grind but assuming you score at least a few points higher, it can make a world of a difference at those schools and in the wend will be well worth it.
Alive97 wrote:Yeah especially if June was your first take there's no question here. I did the full time + studying too and it's a grind but very doable. Sign up now and crush that thing
Absolutely retake. I disagree with one of the above posters about your current chance at Harvard. Im guessing you have less than a 50% chance at HLS even though your softs are definitely strong. If you were PTing above what you got that means you've still got points left on the table for sure. You got this! Go kill it!Barack O'Drama wrote:Alive97 wrote:Yeah especially if June was your first take there's no question here. I did the full time + studying too and it's a grind but very doable. Sign up now and crush that thing
+1
I take it you are referring to my post. I said his chances were "okay" but I didn't elaborate. You assumed that my interpretation of an "okay shot" at Harvard meant that he had at the very least a 50% being granted admission. While the ambiguity of my post is subject to interpretation, that's not what I was trying to insinuate. That said, I agree with you insofar as OP's chances of gaining admission to Harvard are less than 50% with his current score, despite strong softs and that a few extra points will exponentially improve his/her chances.Hildegard15 wrote:Absolutely retake. I disagree with one of the above posters about your current chance at Harvard. Im guessing you have less than a 50% chance at HLS even though your softs are definitely strong. If you were PTing above what you got that means you've still got points left on the table for sure. You got this! Go kill it!Barack O'Drama wrote:Alive97 wrote:Yeah especially if June was your first take there's no question here. I did the full time + studying too and it's a grind but very doable. Sign up now and crush that thing
+1
Well that was long winded.yaliehopeful wrote:I take it you are referring to my post. I said his chances were "okay" but I didn't elaborate. You assumed that my interpretation of an "okay shot" at Harvard meant that he had at the very least a 50% being granted admission. While the ambiguity of my post is subject to interpretation, that's not what I was trying to insinuate. That said, I agree with you insofar as OP's chances of gaining admission to Harvard are less than 50% with his current score, despite strong softs and that a few extra points will exponentially improve his/her chances.Hildegard15 wrote:Absolutely retake. I disagree with one of the above posters about your current chance at Harvard. Im guessing you have less than a 50% chance at HLS even though your softs are definitely strong. If you were PTing above what you got that means you've still got points left on the table for sure. You got this! Go kill it!Barack O'Drama wrote:Alive97 wrote:Yeah especially if June was your first take there's no question here. I did the full time + studying too and it's a grind but very doable. Sign up now and crush that thing
+1
My bad! Didn't mean to misinterpret what you wrote. I see we are in agreement then.yaliehopeful wrote:
We are haha. Apologies for the misunderstanding and the ambiguity of my post!Hildegard15 wrote:My bad! Didn't mean to misinterpret what you wrote. I see we are in agreement then.yaliehopeful wrote: